https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/77fb01065fbc0819f4db1123061f2c50.pdf c14a7053f08bef0e8e04c60ee9f1b697 PDF Text Text Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur faeces a {'information ISlSRAKDUIi $ 2723-2 (DCRS) L 2733^316/706 L 2?20-ii$QG/G0 DCK2«2 2 6 August^ 1966 SYSTEM CHANGES ~ ONTARIO AND HSDRA J » I — upwiII • i i. mi t i mi • w f f i | T i - - r - i - " i i i i n TITT -—--[ • • -| — !«, The following points should be followed up with HQ CFCS SJ& developing the detailed pl.sias to ftaples&xt the decisions of the aieet^isg botweoa Comd CFCS aisd staff ,4 DCRS and A/DCE oa 22 Aug 66 regarding proposed system change iavolvJag the Torcato-Tfsaton coarplet aad. tho Rockcliffe TRC* 2D i t M&S agreed a t 17a nestings a . that th® chafiysa Sa the ?Qreat&*>Trentc& ceroid: (CFCS pro- pjsal ef 10 t.-m 66) ere agreed in principle, oubisct t© eea* siderut'jca c./ certain pointsj b« that t&e c h / ^ e s 5ja tine Ottawa area will nefr have the p^Siaasy a&3 of reliovicg tho lead ea Rockcliffo aad the secondary aia of 3xapre«ri;i t r a f f i c Htzu 3o I t ie access?/,'/ to takQ Sato eeceaat certain proposals v&ich HQ CFCS i s developing r-tjardSEg tho KaatreaX area e You should offset l i a l o s a tilth HQ CFCS to pax't.oipate in this pl£im$fig9 he HQ CFCS-also i s caaaidor&ag sense cfesages ia BritSfih Colw;baa<» Here ©gala you ehoall get Involved i a their plasaiag, oo that tre l e s s KO time i a processing t i 3 project* 5» Sfeese ore -Ms.': ©aly plsao for system changes Hhich EQ CFCS io eeaelder 5ng sm» . I t i s deaSrable that they a l l bo brought out for ©oamination by DCH32, DCHS3, anc" DCE so that HQ CFCS doss not proceed too far /tfith plaaa before c«aaulttT3g Gff 3,* TORCMO-TRBKTOM FLAK . g w w w c •%iiiiMia»M^m'i!»nm*iii»nwnwii»wwa«wpfci> 6« Th© l i e t of ' t i r e o l i s which n o s t b e t&cluded oa t h e BORDER TRC i a a t Aaaest A* 7« The HQ CFCS jvopceal (CFR P&gaa 7«*S) establishes a Kecd for thro© circuits betsjeaa B O M 01 aad CAR?„ It proposes that tho ceisaeeted RTT circuit be counted as one of theoe,. This is n#t agreed^ tse ohsald proride a third leased circuit (leace period to b© adjusted if not seeded cs 2U/7 basis - Esybe 12/£ wcVJ.d d©)«, Our ctncqpt ef th8 use of cesaected RTf circuits is that they r.upply iinasdiateXy available redendant capacity,, so eoo. �Document disclosed under the Access to Document divulgue en vertu de la Loisur f that in the event of loss of one of the leased c i r c u i t y there is Insaediate capacity available on the connected RTT circuit to carry the traffic of the tnlflsiag circuit nut51 yet another RTT circuit can be patched onto the terminal equipment nonsally used on the missing leased circuit a Thus on the mill trunk routes there i s alt-iays one connected redundant RTT circuit available to carry the traffic of any .faulty, leased c i r c u i t . In the former Army network there are usually three RTT circuits t one of 'which ia connected t c the TRC and the other two terminated a t circuit control ready for patching<» (Note? There i s no objection to using one or wore of the RTT circuits for live t r a f f i c in order t o eajercise them, as long as the concept of one spare circuit is maintained )<, GgggaftL P0BJT5 80 Routing Doctrine? The previous individual network routing dcctria^"~ca21eQ "for transfer of traffic to a connected network a t the point nearest the originator. This rule a i s e t i l l applicable^ could result ia overloading of a particular network if a amaber of aew tributary responsibilities are sieved to i t from, another network,,. I t has been intended to adept a universal routing systera fer the CFCS' n^work to eliminate this© HQ CFCS were sot sure at the -meeting whether the universal systssi was yet implemented,, because of lack ef OLC on the fenaer Array network* but they believe the rule about transfer e-f traffic has been lsaiveds This taust be followed up t o ensure that traffic* in the network i s normally routed on the optimum path, rather than on an a r t i f i c i a l l y ^ ictated path* This must be confirmed before any changes can be implemented, 9© I'^aaingg The. application of tneas-ared scales to the elesseais of the system involving oreargency government wast 'take account of exceptions (additions) necessary.to handling the extra load of REGHQ, FBRC, RDRC and ZEGHQ loads* There is no l i s t i n g ia the CFR of circuit loading under emergency conditions© I t is necessary to include this so that i t is not l o s t sight ef0 ~Q* Cirguit^Ut 51iaationi Page lli^ para 8 S 8 of t h e CFR assumes t h a t an automatic TRG can achieve almost 100$ c i r c u i t u t i l i s a t i o n . The a c t u a l f i g u r e , based on IB experience^ i s %%„ In t h i s p a r t i c u l a r case, the proposed 3eale i s adequate even with t h i 3 lower assumed u t i l i z a t i o n * 'il», ^ Spare TRC positional The available number ef-spare TRC c i r c u i t positions t o provide for tape change and maintenance needs rechecking because t h e r e a r e irore Emergency Government c i r c u i t s t o be considered (see Annex A)., I t seems reasonable t o assume t h a t t h e "redundant capacity RTT"-Circuit positions on t h e TRC can contribute t o t h e spares available for this purpose on a practical basis,-as long as their'use for this is. not of long duration (say 1-2 hours) aad as losag as not acre than 1 or 2 are so 3CH>sitted a t any one ttoe„ We need t o establish a target figure for f u l l y spare positions for such planning^ t h i s obviously depends on the also of the TRG* Spares are needed for each speed of circuits O.O.a, �Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur /'acces a /'information • 12j, Consultant*s Flan; It i s necessary to recognize that the Consultant Etust prepare a phased iBtplejnentatioa plan,, This tneans he i&ust be kept informed of changes sade in the systeraa DCRS has directed that our proposed changes be referred to the Consultant t o obtain cosfir.iaation that they will sot inhibit installation of new equipment later under his Plan., and to ensure that his implementation plan takes account of the current configuratioao This can be done by a simple" diagram showing final arrangement, with brief notes of charges made* * Do Toronto area one not? « do not wait u n t i l Rockcliffe plan finished 0 ^o FDX~HDX: The use of HDX circuits imposes difficulties in TRC operation,. I t ^as agreed that DCRS2 Hill support FDX circuits in such cases (eg CLINTOM & CSNTRALIA)• •~-k» ISIlp".* ^ e u s e °% ^ E X £ ° r delivery and for ccssaercisl r e f i l e is soimd"aSair. agreed in cases xrhere survivability is not necessary (eg to serve tributaries or customers in a target area. However, T3L3Z switching centres are usually in target areas, and therefore TELEX is not satisfactory for delivery or ecisnsrcial r e f i l e service frora a TRC THhich has an emergency r o l e . 10o NOMENGIATURB; It has been agreed that Coma Sqn aarees or nuirihers •will NOT be usexT^oTrefer to TRCs, isessage centres, telephone exchanges, or stationso The geographic location will be used* Examples are BOKDEH TRC| BORDUM COMCEH3 CARP* TRC* CFCS STATION CARP? CARP COKJEMj CARP CRIPTOCENj OTTAWA TRC (CFHQ)* OTTAWA COHCEW (CFHQ)* e t c . Where the addition of the HQ nomenclature w i n clarify, i t isay be added 7 an brackets« Our systeia diagrams are to be amended to confers %he& next issuedo References ia CFRs are to conforra. 16. RCN Sequence^Selectors- The RCMf network employed.a sequence sel eetor'oB the 'Otta^ia^saacouvar leased circuit, xfith the aiis of exploiting this c i r c u i t ' t o serve Havgl Divisions 0 This.should be reviewed to determine present status"(noting eiiraiaation of soae ITaval Reserve-Divisions under the recent reorganisation of Reserves )„ I t assy be that this sequence 'selector needs rearrangement * This should be i n vestigated and a reeowaandatioa included in the plan. \-fjU Finch Lt Col DCRS 2 2~Oh70 000257 �Document disclosed under the Access to Information Acm Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur /'acces a I'inforn&ion AKKEI A T O L 2723~-2(DCR3) L 2733^316/708 L 2720»a500/00 DATED % August, 1966 BORDEN TBLSGRAi^ RELAY CENTRE CIRCUIT COhgTMEHIB •naiMK imcuns la C'IBP (SMITHS FAJIS) TRC 2* CARP (RENFREW) TRC |, CARP (RTT) TRC /. VADCARTIER (SF) TRC 5« vAICARTISR (ES8) TRC 6„ VALCARTIER (RTT) TRC To SHILQ (SF) TRC; 8. SHIM) (REN) TRC 9„ SHILO (RTT) TRC 10* FORT RILEY (Leased Circuit) TRC 11* FORT RILET (RTT) (Hote: Prefer TRC connection rath.\--jjan patch) I2 a CCB BATTLE CREEK 13* DOT MJSKDKA (Confirmed as requirement with EH3/D0T on .'•« 4vg (-&) mszsmsa: GOVT TRIHS Ik,, ECMP OWEN SOUND 1$. RDRC ORILLIA 16,, ZEGEQ FT WILLIAM 17. ZEGHQ SUDBURY 18 a ZBGHQ BARRIS 19 0 ZEGHQ L0NDOJJ so of£ 000258 �£ mt 20» ZEGHQ BELLEVILLE 21.3 ZEGHQ ROOTM/iJOHaMDA 22. ZEGHQ GUSLEff 23<, ZEGHQ PETERBOROUGH «* Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur I'acces a /'information DHD TRIBS 2Xu CFEHQ (DM) 1 1 3 1 0 ) PETAUAvJA 2$e CFEHQ (RTT) PETAVJA1JA 26<> TRENTON ( L e a s e d C i r c u i t ) TRC ( v i c e KINGSTON) 27c TH3NTON (RTT) TRC (vice KINGSTON) 28* LONDON (leased Circuit) TRC Z9o REGHQ Coacea 30» REGHQ CoEcen 31o REGHQ Gryptocan 32 a CAMP BORDEN Coacea 33* 0AK7ILLS TRC((Leased c c t ) 3ho OAKVILLE TRC (Leased e s t ) 3$o STA DOWNSVJEW BASE COMCEN 36 e 1 SD DCvJHSVmr 37e Spare position, (paper change and maintenance) 38<, Spare p o s i t i o n (paper change and raaintenance) 39o Spare p o s i t i o n (paper change and naintcnance) Notes Io 2. C a s e d RTT LONDON - BORDEN Cancel RTT 0AK7ILL3 - BORDEN 000259 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Hydra Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context HY00332 Title A name given to the resource System Changes - Ontario and Hydra Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 08/26/1966 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Fixed Communications - Hydra Telegraph Relay System - Relocation of Hydra - Plans and Policy, RG24, S-2723-2, Vol. 2, Library and Archives Canada (LAC) Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Department of National Defence Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Canadian Crown Subject The topic of the resource Rockcliffe, telegraph circuits, landlines, CFCS, Borden, Carp, emergency communications, radio communications Description An account of the resource Memorandum from W.H. Finch to DCRS2-2 pertaining to proposed system changes to Toronto-Trenton complex, system changes due to a heavier traffic load at Rockcliffe, and changes to improve traffic flow at various army trunk and tributary stations. Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Canada Declassified Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource PDF Language A language of the resource en