https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/84921482ba7db3abfd8d5e73a543428f.pdf 53d6126d175a7e9f4f560e70e215a6d2 PDF Text Text l COPYJ'j OF 23 DOWNGRADED TL~1J.=--w~~,f~~....C~I ·~ REDUIT ASE=c=RE~-i-..:~..JI FMNATOPARIS OCT27/62~SEC 'h.1'..-5 l~ tP-.) }f TO EXTERNAL 2515 OPIMMED INFO CCOSEMBIARISLONWASHDC PRIORITY REF OURTEL2487 ~1 +-=-- (J fEB 2 7 1 4 - OCT25 BERLINCONTINGENCY PLANNING I HAVEREVIEWED THE NUMEROUS TELS ANOPAPERSON THIS Sl.13 AMSENDINGTHIS MSGIN ORDERTO CLARirYTO GREATEST EXTENT E WHATWILLBE INVOLVED WHENCO~CIL RESUMES CONSIDERATION OF MILITARY ASPECTSOF CONTINGENCY PLANNING NEXTWEEK.PROCEDURAL BASIS MAYBE FOUNDIN P0/62/641.THERE ARETHREEPOINTSOF IMPORTANCE. 2.FIRST IS QUESTION OF APPROVAL or MAJOR NATOCMDRS PLANS.ONTHIS POINT,THEREIS GENERAL SUPPORTFOR A FORM ULAAPPROVING PLANSQUOTE IN PRINCIPLEAND FOR PLANNING PURPOSES~QUOTE LNDERREVISEDVERSION OF PARA8CB)OFP0/62/641 WHICHIS DESCRIBEDIN PARA2OF MYREFTEL. 3.SECONDQUESTIONHASTO DO WITHRELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NATO AND TRIPARTITEPLANNING ANDC~TROL.I KAVEOBTAINED VIEWSOF BELGIANS ANDITALIANSON THIS POINT AS REQUESTED IN PARA2OF YRTELDL1509 OCT!9. THEYLIKE US ARENOT RPT NOTENT!RELY SATI SFIEO ONTHIS POINT YETBUT ARENEVERTHELES~ PREPARED TO AGREETHATPLANSSHOULD BE APPROVED.DANES ANDNORWEGIANS,ON OTHERHAND,HAVE PRIVATELYASKED US NOT RPT NOTTO PRESS THIS POINT.WHILETHEYARE AS CONCERNED AS WETO ENSURETHATOTHERNATOGOVTSAREKEPTAS FULLYINFORMED AS VHu-JA!vLY POSSIBLEDURINGA DEVELOP ING CRISIS, THEYARECONCERNED OVERRISK OF POLITICALESCALATION WHICHMIGHTBE Rl)J IF NATOTOOK OVERCONTROL OF MILITARYRESPONSESAT TOOEARLYA STAGE.IT IS AGAINSTTHIS BACKGRO~D THATCOUNCILWILLBE ASKEDTO QUOTEAGREE 00 A DEFINITIONOF NATOANDTRIPARTITEPLANNING RESPONSIBILITYAND ONPROPOSALS FOR TRANSFEROF CONTROL FROMTRIPARTITETO NATOMECH• ANISMCONTAINED IN THREEPOWERPAPEROF SEP18 l.NQUOTECPARAllCC) OF P0/62/641>. 4.THIRD QUESTIONHASTO DO WITHQUOTEPREFERRED SEQUENCE ••• 2 000680 �PAGE TWO2515 ';' lJ.lQUOTE PAPER.HERESUGGESTIQN IS CPARAl 2 OF P0/62/641 >THATCOUNCIL QUOTEMAYWISHTO ACCEPTTHIS PAPERAS GENERAL FRAMEWORK FOR ITS CONTINUING DISCUSSIONOF OVERALL PROBLEM OF CO-ORDINATING ACTIONS ANDPOLICIES OF AL.LIES IN .EVENT OF A WORSENINGOF BERLIN SITUATION ~QUOTE.I TAKEIT THATYOUWOULD WISHMETO JOIN IN A GENERAL ACCEPTANCE OF PVREFERRED SEQUENCEPAPERFOR THIS PURPOSE,SINCETO DO SO WOULDBE TO PROVIDE A PROCEDURALBASIS ON WHICH WECOULD CONTINUE TO INSIST ONOBTAINING INFO ABOUPARALLEL POLITICALPLANNING IGBATIEFF ll 000681 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource NATO Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Berlin Crisis / 27 OCTOBER 1962 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1962-10-22 Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource PDF Language A language of the resource en Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context CDTT00048 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived NATO Paris to External Affairs, "Berlin Contingency Planning,’’ 27 Oct. 1962, LAC, RG 25, vol. 6080, file no. 50341-A-2-40, part 2. Belgians Danes George Ignatieff Italians Norwegians