<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="6295" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/items/show/6295?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-08-15T07:53:23-04:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="7374">
      <src>https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/ecdec649dfe174ef5184ab90b9a0706b.pdf</src>
      <authentication>2851dc12d995556e01d757802ca19f33</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="31">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="131">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="86817">
                  <text>Documenfflisclosecnlnderthg^f cess to Information Act Document divulgue en vertjfae \alai sur I'acces a finformat

^ A y&amp;m
*

.
%

(

FM WASHDC DEC 1 2 / 5 7 TOPSEC CDN EYES ONLY
TO EXTERNAL 2630 OPIMMEDIATE

%\4j&amp;\
V *
$&amp;

x^thmz-i

REF OUR TEL 2626 DEC 12
USA PROPOSALS RE' CLOSER INTEGRATION OF ATOMIC CAPABILITIES IN
DEFENCE OF NORTHAMERICA
AS THE STATE DEPT HAD INFORMALLY INDICATED IN ADVANCE TO US,
MR JOHN JONES,ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EUROPEAN AFFAIRS,
CALLED ME TO THE DEPT TODAY FOR THE PURPOSE OF OUTLINING USA
PROPOSALS FOR THE CLOSER INTEGRATION OF ATOMIC CAPABILITIES IN
DEFENCE OF NORTHAMERICA .GENERAL LOPER,CHAIRMAN OF THE MILITARY
COMMITTEE TO THE ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION,WAS PRESENT,AS WERE
REPS OF THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL ASSISTANT FOR ATOMIC ENERGY
MATTERS IN THE STATE DEPT,AND OFFICIALS FROM THE CANADIAN DESK.
JONES EXPLAINED THAT HE WAS RECEIVING ME IN THE ABSENCE OF BURKE
ELBRICK,WHO HAS LEFT FOR THE NATO MEETINGS.HE BEGAN BY REFERRING
TO EARLIER DISCUSSIONS BETWEEN MR ELBRICK AND MY PREDECESSOR ON
SEPl9/56,WHEN THE STATE DEPT OUTLINED ITS PLANS FOR AN AGREEMENT
GOVERNING THE USE BY USAF OF THE MB-1 AIR TO AIR ROCKET.THIS
PARTICULAR AGREEMENT WAS NOW IN EFFECT AS A RESULT OF FORMAL EXCHANGES OF NOTES BETWEEN THE TWO GOVTS.JONES SAID THAT THE EARLIER
MEETING CONSTITUTED THE FIRST STEP IN THE STUDY OF MEANS BY WHICH
SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS COULD BE MADE TO INCORPORATE ATOMIC
WEAPONS INTO COMMON AIR DEFENCE OF THE NORTHAMERICAN CONTINENT.
THE MB-1 AGREEMENT WHICH HAD BEEN CONCLUDED ON FEB19/57,HAD BEEN
RENEWED ON JUN28 LAST TO BE EFFECTIVE UNTIL J U L 1 / 5 8 .
2.THE USA AUTHORITIES NOW WISHED TO BEGIN EXPLORATIONS IN THE
FIRST INSTANCE IN USA-CANADIAN MILITARY CHANNELS OF WAYS AND MEANS
OF BRINGING ABOUT A CLOSER INTEGRATION OF ATOMIC CAPABILITIES IN
CONTINENTAL AIR DEFENCE. (THIS,' INTENTION WAS REFERRED TO IN THE
MOST RECENT USA NOTE CONCERNING MB-1, ROCKET OVERFLIGHT ARRANGEMENTS.)
THE MATTERS THEY WOULD LIKE TO TAKE UP IN THESE TALKS WOULD INCLUDES&lt;A)WAYS AND MEANS UNDER THE ATOMIC ENERGY ACT OF SUPPLYING MB-1
HE

ROCKETS TO RCAF INTERCEPTORS; (B)THE PROVISION OF ATOMIC WARISADS
TO ANY BOMARC UNITS THAT MAY BE ESTABLISHED IN CANADA* (C)POSSIBLE
CANADIAN REQUIREMENTS FOR NIKE-HERCULES TYPE WEAPONS WITH
...2

000427

�Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur I'acces a finformati

PAGE TWO 2 6 3 0
-ATOMIC WARHEADS.
3 . T H r ^ E PROPOSED TALKS WOULD ALSO INCLUDE PLANS FOR STORAGE OF
MB-1 ROCKETS FOR EMPLOYMENT BY USAF INTERCEPTORS AT GOOSE BAY
AND CERTAIN OTHER POINTS IN CANADA.THE USA NAVY IS PREPARED TO
UNDERTAKE SEPARATE DISCUSSIONS WITH THE CANADIAN NAVY CONCERNING
AN ITEM OF MORE URGENCY,NAMELY,THE INTRODUCTION OF NUCLEAR ANTISUBMARINE DEVICES AT THE LEASED BASE IN ARGENTIA.
^i.JONES INDICATED THAT BEFORE ANY STEPS ARE TAKEN TO INITIATE THE
PROPOSED DISCUSSIONS THROUGH MILITARY CHANNELS,THE VIEWS AND
COMMENTS OF THE CANADIAN GOVT WERE BEING SOUGHT IN ADVANCE.
5.AS A SEPARATE MATTER,THE STATE DEPT WISHED TO RAISE THE QUESTION
OF THE STORAGE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS AT GOOSE BAY FOR SAC,IN ORDER
TO IMPROVE THE OPERATIONAL EFFCTIVENESS OF THE STRATEGIC AIR
COMMAND.THE USA REQUEST ON THIS. ASPECT WAS SET FORTH IN AN AIDE
MEMOIRE,THE TEXT OF WHICH IS CONTAINED IN MY TEL 2 6 3 1 . J O N E S EXPLAINED THAT THE QUESTION OF THE ARRANGEMENT FOR THE DEPLOYMENT OF
NUCLEAR WEAPONS AT GOOSE BAY WAS BEING TAKEN UP WITH US DIRECTLY
WITHOUT PRIOR MILITARY CONSULTATION PRIMARILY FOR THE REASON THAT
LONG STAND ING (XYZ) PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN IN EFFECT WITH CANADA
C^ERING THE CLEARANCE OF SAC PLANES CARRYING ATOMIC WEAPONS.
6.ON ALL THE FOREGOING MATTERS IT WAS MADE CLEAR THAT THE USA'
AUTHORITIES LOOKED FOR AN EXPRESSION OF THE VIEWS OF. THE CANADIAN
GOVT BEFORE ANY EXPLORATIONS THROUGH MILITARY CHANNELS ARE BEGUN.
I TOLD JONES IN REPLY THAT THESE PROPOSALS WOULD BE BROUGHT TO
YOUR ATTENTION AT ONCE,BUT INDICATED THAT IN VIEW OF THE FORTHCOMING NATO MEETING,AND THE ABSENCE OF MINISXRS FROM OTTAWA,
THERE MIGHT BE SOME DELAY IN OBTAINING YOUR VIEWS.
7 , 1 RAISED THE QUESTION OF THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE PRESENTATION
OF -fesE PROPOSALS TO ANY PROPOSALS WHICH MAY BE MADE AT THE

•

FORTHCOMING NATO SESSIONS .JONES RECOGNIZED THE CLEAR RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN THE TWO,AND SAID THAT THE PROPOSALS PRESENTED TO US TODAY
MIGT HAVE TO BE MODIFIED IN SOME RESPECTS AS A RESULT OF THE NATO *
DISCUSS IONS,AND THAT CONVERSELY,THEY MIGHT TO SOME EXTENT AFFECT
THE PROPOSALS TO BE MADE IN THE NATO CONTEXT .THE. STATE DEPT HAD
7^

000428

CONCLUDED,HOWEVER,THAT THESE PROPOSALS SHOULD BE BROUGHT/.OUR
• "
...3

�Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur I'acces a I'inf ormat^

^

'

PAGE THREE 2 6 3 0
ATTENTION BEFORE THE NATO MEETING PRIMARILY BECAUSE OF THE LONG
*

HIS

!Y OF CLOSE COOPERATION IN DEFENCE MATTERS,AND OUR COMMON

RESPONSIBILITIES

IN JOINT DEFENCE.

8.THE QUESTION WAS RAISED AS TO WHETHER THE PROPOSED PROVISION OF
THE MB-1R0CKET TO THE RCAF COULD BE ARRANGED WITHIN7HE LIMITATIONS OF THE PRESENT ATOMIC ENERGY LEGISLATION.GENERAL LOPER REPLIED
TO THIS,POINTING HIT THAT THE LIMITATIONS _ OF PRESENT LEGISLATION
REQUIRED USA CUSTODY,BUT THAT THIS WAS ONE OF THE DETAILED MATTERS
WHICH IT WAS HOPED TO EXPLORE FURTHER IN THE MILITARY DISCUSSIONS
ENVISAGED.PRESUMABLY SIMILAR PROBLEMS WOULD HAVE TO BE EXAMINED
IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED PROVISION OF ATOMIC WARHEADS TO
ANY BOMARC UNITS THAT MIGHT BE ESTABLISHED IN CANADA,AND TO THE
POSSIBLE PROVISION FOR CANADIAN REQUIREMENTS OF NIKE-HERCULES
WEAPONS WITH ATOMIC WARHEADS.
9 . I N VIEW OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THESE PROPOSALS,AND THEIR POLITICAL
AS WELL AS MILITARY IMPLICATIONS FOR CANADA,I DREW ATTENTION TO
MY UNDERSTANDING THAT WHEN THE QUESTION OF THE ETABLISHMENT OF
STORAGE FOR,NON-NUCLEAR COMPONENTS AT GOOSE BAY HAD COME UP SOME
YEARS AGO,UNDER THE PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATIONS IN BOTH COUNTRIES,WE
HAD BEEN INFORMED OF THE INTONAL CONSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS WHICH
WOULD GOVERN THE REACHING OF A DECISION BY THE PRESIDENT TO AUTHORIZE THE USE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS.MY UNDERSTANDING WAS THAT WHILE
THE RESPONSIBILITY OF DECISION FOR THEIR USE LAY ULTIMATELY IN
THE HANDS OF THE PRESIDENT,THERE HAD BEEN SET UP A DIRECT CHAIN
OF PRIOR CONSULTATION IN WHICH THE SECRETARY OF STATE WAS INCLUDED WHICH HAD TO BE FOLLOWED BEFORE A FINAL DECISION WITH RESPECT
TO USE WAS TAKEN.I ASKED IF THESE ARRANGEMENTS WERE PRESENTLY IN
FORCE.GENERAL LOPER SAID THAT UNDER EXISTING LEGISLATION AND THE
RULES OF PROCEDURE,THE PRESIDENT HAD THE FINAL AUTHORITY,AND THAT
HE ASSUMED THAT THE DECISION AS TO WHOM HE SHOULD CONSULT WOULD
BE H I S . ( I FEEL THAT THIS MATTER OF I N TERNAL USA PROCEDURE THOUGH TECHNICALLY A DOMESTIC ONE IS IN FACT
' OF VERY GREAT AND DIRECT CONCERN TO A COUNTRY ASSOCIATED AS CLOSELY
WITH USA DEFENCE AS CANADA

IS).

1 0 . I N REPLY TO A FURTHER QUESTION ON MY PART,JONES AND GENERAL

000429

�-

'

,•

Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur I'acces a I'information

PAGE FOUR 2 6 3 0
LOPF^ BOTH CONFIRMED THAT THE ARRANGEMENT REQUESTED IN THE AIDE
MEMOIRE FOR THE STORAGE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS AT GOOSE BAY WAS SIMILAR
TO AN ARRANGEMENT ALREADY CONCLUDED BETWEEN THE USA AND THE UK GOVT.
ON THIS POINT MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THE NEW ELEMENT IS THAT
WHILE ARRANGEMENTS ARE PRESENTLY IN EFFECT FOR THE STORAGE OF
THE NON-NUCLEAR COMPONENTS AT GOOSE BAY FOR SAC,THE PRESENT
REQUEST RELATES TO A REQUEST FOR THE STORAGE OF THE NUCLEAR
COMPONENTS.
11.WE ARE NOT PROPOSING ANY DISTRIBUTION OF THIS.MSG.YOU WILL
PRESUMABLY,HOWEVER,REPEAT IT TO THE,MINISTER AT NATOPARIS,WHERE
HE CAN DISCUSS IT WITH THE PRIME MINISTER AND GENERAL PEARKS
ROBERTSON

000430

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="43">
          <name>Identifier</name>
          <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="45133">
              <text>CDNW01211</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="45136">
              <text>WashDC to External 2630</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="45139">
              <text>12/12/1957</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="48">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="45142">
              <text>"Canada/US Agreement for Cooperation concerning military aspects of atomic energy." RG25-A-3-b, vol. 5957, 50219-AK-40, part 2, Library and Archives Canada (LAC).</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="39">
          <name>Creator</name>
          <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="45145">
              <text>Department of External Affairs</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="45148">
              <text>Canadian Crown</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="45151">
              <text>Atomic energy cooperation</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="41">
          <name>Description</name>
          <description>An account of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="45154">
              <text>USA Proposals for Closer Integration of Atomic Capabilities in Defence of North America</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="45">
          <name>Publisher</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="45157">
              <text>Canada Declassified</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="45160">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="42">
          <name>Format</name>
          <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="45163">
              <text>PDF</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="44">
          <name>Language</name>
          <description>A language of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="45166">
              <text>en</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
