<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="6089" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/items/show/6089?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-08-06T18:29:21-04:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="4209">
      <src>https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/f09f1c76bcc931f06ba2bda9285d0241.pdf</src>
      <authentication>3162e62f5dea6414144c5d9c4e47ae99</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="31">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="131">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="44433">
                  <text>IF*

bcument dis
Document divulgue e^ft/ertUd&amp;la/Le/ sup'acces

TB •

SWC R E T

CDN

E Y E S

tion Act
ayinformation

Doll

ONLY

FM CANDELNATO MAYt/69 CDN EYES ONLY
TO TT EXTER 1 2 4 1 PRIORITY DE LDN
INFO LDN TT WSHDC PARIS BRU HAGUE BONN ROME MOSCO DE LDN
BAG ATHNS ANKRA COPEN OSLO PRGUE WSAW BGRAD DE LDN LSBON DE OTT
REF MYLET N342 APR29
MINISTERIAL MTG WSHDC APRli-SPECIAL SESSION WITH PRESIDENT NXXON
I HAVE FORWARDED BY BAG APR29 FULL SUMMARY RECORD OF ABOVE RESTR MTG
OF WHICH THERE WILL BE NO/NO OFFICIAL RECORD OWING HOWEVER TO CURRENT
DISRUPTION OF COURRIER SVC I AM SENDING FOLLOWING TELEGRAPHIC
SUMMARY,
2oiTHE MTG WAS HELD AT PRESIDENT NIXONS INITIATIVE IN CONTINUATION OF
HIS POLICY OF INTIMATE CONSULTATION WITHIN THE ALLIANCE*ATTENDANCE
AT THE MTG WAS LTD TO HEADS OF DELS PLUS TWQ9IE IN OUR CASEP
SSEA MND AND MYSELF.
3oTHE PRESIDENT STATED THAT HE WISHED TO DEVOTE MTG TO EXPLANATION
OF USA ABM POLICY NOT/NOT BECAUSE ABMS WERE AN ALLIANCE
RESPONSIBILITY BUT BECAUSE OF THEIR RELEVANCE TO ALLlAMCE SECURITY..
4«HE HAD BEEN FACED IN USA WITH CRITICISM

OF ABMS SIMILAR TO

CRITICISM OF NATO ITSELF, THAT BOTH WERE ANACHRONISTIC, ??ANY IN USA
HAD ASKED THE QUESTION QUOTE WHY SHOULD USA HAVE MORE ARMS STRENGTH
WHEN THEY ALREADY HAD EN0U6H?UNQU0TEoIN THE SAME WAY THE VALUE OF
NATO WAS QUESTIONED*IF WAR DID OCCUR,THESE CRITICS SAID THERE
WOULD BE STRATEGIC EXCHANGE AND THEREFORE THE ALLIANCE COMMITMENT
WAS ILLOGICAL,
»• o 2

000222

�Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur I'acces a I'information

PAGE TWO 1 2 4 1 S E C R E T

CDN

E Y E S

ONLY

fc,THE PRESIDENT FELT THAT HIS OBLIGATION WA3 TO RESIST THIS KIND
/ ' C F THINKING IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN ABILITY TO NEGOTIATE

RCuE STRENGTH-

t

THE ONLY THING THE OTHER SIDE UNDERSTOOD, HE STATED THA"' USA SUCCESS
DURING CUBAN CRISIS HAD BEEN DUE TO HAVING STRENGTH WK CH HAD
ALLOWED USA TO TAKE A STRONG LINE DIPLOMATICALLY. SUBSE-UENTLY BALANCE
OF POWER HAD SHIFTED DRAMATICALLYoSINCE 67 THERE HAD S EN INCREASE
OK 6 0 PERCENT IN SOVIET NUCLEAR SUBMARINE CAPABILITY A' WELL AS
SIMILAR INCREASE IN SOVIET SS9S MISSILES DESIGNED TO K OCK OUT
HARDENED ICBM SITES,AT SAME TIME THERE HAD INCREASE IN SOVIET
CONVENTIONAL SUPERIORITY,
6, USA COULD NO/NO LONGER INSIST ON MAINTAINING OVERWHE MING
STRATEGIC SUPERIORITY, THIS WOULD NOT/NOT BE CONDUCIVE

0

NEGOTIATIONS,HOWEVERpHE WOULD SEEK SUFFICIENCY OF NUCL AR POWER,
ENPUGH TO DETER AND TO ENSURE DIPLO BARGAINING STRENGT , USA COULD
NOT/NOT EXPOSE THE WESTERN WORLD TO POLITICAL BLACKMAI * THE
CREDIBILITY OF THE NUCLEAR DETERRENT HAD TC BE MAINTAI ED*
7,

THE PRESIDENT HAD BEEN FACED WITH TWO ALTERNATIVES? *0 STRENGTHEN

EITHER OFFENSIVE CAPABILITY OR DEFENSIVE*. HE HAD CHOSEN LATTER.
SELECTION OF ABMS AND SPECIFICALLY SAFEGUAR; SYSTEM HA» BEEN BASED ON
FOLLOWING REASONS(A)THE EXISTENCE OF A SOVIET ABM SYST .M THE
.EFFECTIVENESS OF WHICH WAS NOT/NOT KNOWN BUT WHICH, BAS .D ON VERY
:

RECENT INTELLIGENCES WAS STILL EXPANDING. THE MAIN RADAR WAS BEING
ALIGNED TOWARDS CHINA,
oa • O

000223

�IF!

cument disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur Tacces a Tinformation

) PAST THREE 124 1

S E C R E T C D N E Y E S O N L Y

B&gt; THE SENTINEL SYSTEM WOULD HAVE MADE SOVIET PENETRATION MORE
DIFFICULT BUT WOULD NOT/NOT HAVE PREVENTED IT,
&amp;THE SAFEGUARD SYSTEM PROVIDED AN AREA DEFENCE WHICH WOULD
BE EFFECTIVE AGAINST CHINA FOR TEN YEARS AND WOULD LEND
CREDIBILITY TO THE USAS PACIFIC POLICY,

^

p. SAFEGUARD WOULD IMPROVE THE BALACE OF POWER WITH USSR BY

-.

*

'yr

PROTECTING THE NUCLEAR DETERRENT ITSELF,
8 , C R I T I C S OF ABM ARGUED THAT SOVIET SS9S COULD NOT/NOT KNOCK OUT
THE WHOLE OF THE USA DETERRENT,THERE WOULD ALWAYS BE ENOUGH TO
INFLICT UNACCEPTABLE DAMAGE ON THE USSR, BUT THIS WOULD PUT THE USA
IN THE SAME POSITION AS USSR DURING THE CUBAN CRISIS-UNABLE TO
MAKE ITS DIPLO WILL PREVAIL BECAUSE ITS MILITARY ARM WOULD BE
UNEQUAL TO THE BACK-UP TASK, IT WAS THE ESSENCE OF THE ABM DECISION
THAT SUFFICIENT POWER SHOULD BE MAINTAINED TO MAKE DIPLO CREDIBLE
BE BEING ABLE TO DETER ATTACK.
9, WHILE HIS DECISION WAS NOT/NOT POPULAR IT WAS BASED ON VALID
STRATEGIC INFO AND ASSUMPTIONS, NATO HAD SUCCEEDED IN ITS TASK
BECAUSE IT WAS STRONG AND UNITED AND BACKED BY USA NUCLEAR
SHIELD WHICH USSR BELIEVED TO BE REAL, THE ABM WOULD HELP
TO MAINTAIN THIS CREDIBILITY BY A DEFENSIVE MOVE, ABM DECISION
WOULD BE EVALUATED ANNUALLY AND THE COURSE OF USA POLICY COULD BE
ALTERED IF NEW TECHNOLOGY OR PROGRESS IN TALKS WITH SOVIETS
WARRANTED SUCH A CHANGE,
,,»4

000224

�V
PAGE FOUR 1241

Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur I'acces a I'information

S E C R E T C D N E Y E S O i l L Y

10,UK DEFENCE MINISTER HEALEY STATED THAT WULE HE HAD BEEiJ CRITICAL
OF SENTINEL DECISION BECAUSE ITS RATIONALE WAD NEVER BEEN KftDE
CLEAR AND BECAUSE IT HAD NEVER BEEN SUBJ TO INTER"ALLIED
CONSULTATION HE DID NOT/NOT HAVE SIMILAR RESERVATIONS /BOUT
^SAFEGUARD, IN LATTER CASE THERE HAD BEEN CONSULTATION Afc3
^EXPOSITION OF RATIONALE, ALSO BECAUSE SENTINEL HAD BEEN TIED UP WITH
BARGAINING WITH THE USSR SOME ABM CAPABILITY HAD TO BE 'RESERVED
FOR SAME PURPOSI, HE HOPED, HOW EVER, THAT IN USA DOMESTIC

;EBATE

ON ABMS, VULNERABILITY OF ICBMS WOULD NOT/NOT BE EXAGGERATED,
CREDIBILITY OF DETERRENT WAS ESSENTIAL TO NATO STRATEGY
..(ll.UK FM STEWART APPROVED PRESIDENTS LINKING OF ABM DEC SI ON AND
'USA DIPLOMACY, DEFENCE SPENDING WAS UNIVERSALLY UNPOPULA ! SUT MINISTERS
HAD KNOWLEDGE AND RESPONSIBILITY TO REACH DECISIONS,
12,NORWEGIAN M OF D TIDEMAND ENQUIRED WHETHER THERE WAS ANY SIGN
THAT RUSSIANS WERE STOPPING BUILD-UP OF THEH ABM SYSTE :. PRESIDENT
REPLIED THAT 67

SITES HAD BEEN IDENTIFIED AROUND MOSCO

-UT THAT

DEPLOYMENT ELSEWHERE SEEMED TO HAVE STOPPED, WHILE RANDD HAD BEEN
ACCELERATED ACTUAL SECOND GENERATION DEPLOYMENT WAS SLO', SECOND
CSNERATION DEPLOYMENT WAS BELIEVED TO BE PRIMARILY FOR : EFENCE
AGAINST CHINESE BUT SECONDARILY TO PROVIDE CAPABILITY 01 DEFENCE
AGAINST SOPHISTICATED ATTACK AND TO MAINTAIN THE STATE

F THE ART.

1 3 , NETHERLANDS FM LUNS WAS DISTURBED BY GAP 3ETWEEN PUB: IC
IMPRESSION OF USA MISSILE SUPERIORITY AND PRESIDENTS DU CLOSURES.

000225

�iff
PAGE FIVE 1241

cument disclosed under the Access to Information Act ment divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur Tacces a Tinformation

S E C R E T C D N E Y E S O N L Y

HE WONDERED IF THIS KNOWLEDGE GAP SHOULD NOT/NOT BE FILLED,
PRESIDENT REPLIED THAT SUCH PUBLICITY WOULD BE ALARMIN

s

AT HOME

AND ENCOURAGING TO ADVERSARIES, IN ANY EVENT GAP WAS QUALIFIED,
ONLY IN CASE OF ICBMS WAS IT BEING NARROWED, IMPORTANT FACT WAS
HOWEVER THAT SOVIETS WERE CAPABLE OF CLOSING GAP COMPLETELY*
14. PRESIDENT DID NOT/NOT REPLY TO INTERJECTION BY MR DEBRE
ACCEPTION MR NIXONS ANALYSIS BUT QUESTIONING EFFECT IN EUROPE
OF USA/USSR STRATEGIC BALANCE, AGREEMENT BETWEEN USA AND USSR WOULD
ONLY EXPOSE WESTERN INFERIORITY IN CONVENTIONAL ARMS IA EUROPE,
,15. IN REPLY TO A QUESTION FROM MR CADIEUX WHY THE USA HAD NOT/NOT
y DECIDED TO PUT ABMS IN ALASKA WHERE POLITICAL REPERCUSSIONS WOULD
HAVE BEEN LESS THE PRESIDENT SAID THAT IN ALASKA THEY "OULD HAVE
NOT/NOT BEEN RELEVANT TO THE DEFENCE OF MINUTEMAN SITES. IN ANY
EVENT ALASKA AND HAWAI WOULD BE INCLUDED LATER IN THE PROGRAM,
MR LAIRD INTERJECTED THAT TWO ABM SITES CHOSEN WOULD PROTECT
30 PERCENT OF MINUTEMAN LOCATIONS, 100 PERCENT AREA DEFENCE WOULD
BE ACHIEVED WITH FULL PROGRAM INCLUDING 13TK AND 14TH SITES IN
ALASKA AND HAWAI,PRESIDENT ADDED THAT IN PLACING ABMS HEAR CDN
BORDER USA WAS DEFENDING CDA AND ALL OTHER NATO ALLIES.
16. ON BPEST COMMUNIQUE PERSIDENT SAID THAT ITS CURRENT PROPAGANDA
OVERTONES CAUSED HIM TO VIEW IT WITH MORE SCEPTICISM THAN MIGHT
HAVE BEEN CASE FIVE YEARS AGO, IT WAS NOT/NOT HIS INTENTION, HOWEVER,
TO ALLOW OPPONENTS TO OBTAIN MONOPOLY AS PROPONENTS OF PEACE,

000226

�XX
PAGE SIX 124 2

Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur I'acces a I'information

S E C R E T C D N E Y E S O N L Y

USA INTENDED TO PLAY PROPAGANDA GAME AS WELL AS LOOK F R GAINS OF
SUBSTANCE. HERE HE CITED ROGERS TALK WITH KUZNETZOV AND DOBRYNIN
ON SIMULTANEOUS RATIFICATION OF NPT,
17,REPLYING TO A QUESTION FROM GREEK MINISTER PIPINELI
COMMENTING ON MR DEBRES REMARKS, PRESIDENT STATED THAT

AND
NY

AGREEMENT WITH USSR WOULD ATTEMPT ONLY TO QUOTE CODIFY UNQUOTE THE
BALANCE OF DETERRENCE, SUCH A BALANCE COULD NOT/NOT, HOW-VER,
BECOME OUR ONLY DEFENCE, NATO HAD TO MAINTAIN THE CONVE TIONAL
OPTION,USA WOULD HAVE TO TRY TO NEGOTIATE t REDUCTION

*.F USSR

CONVENTIONAL CAPABILITY IN EXCHANGE FOR A STRATEGIC FR EZE, HERE
,HE ADDED THAT SAFEGUARD SYSTEM, THOUGH NOT/fOT JUST FOR BARGAINING
PURPOSES,WAS AN IMPORTANT ADDITIONAL DIPLO CHIP, SO ALS 1 WAS IT
IMPORTANT DIPLOMATICALLY THAT NATO NOT/NOT DISINTEGRATE AMD ITS
-ALREADY INFERIOR CONVENTIONAL POSITION WORSEN.
t

1 8 , I N CONCLUSION PRESIDENT NIXON STATED THfT HE WAS CC 3CI0US
THAT IN NEGOTIATING WITH SOVIETS THEY WERE AT A WATERS !ED IN
HISTORY, HE WAS PREPARED TO GO ALL THE WAY PESPONSIBLY

.N

NEGOTIATIONS BUT WOULD TAKE NO/NO DECISION TO WEAKEN V.;STERN
DETERRENT POWER WITHOUT GETTING CONCESSION! FROM THE C 'HER SIDE,.
EVEN IN THE FACE OF OPPOSITION AT HOME. HE \ OPED THE CI 'ER
MEM3ERS OF THE ALLIANCE WOULD FOLLOW THE SfHE POLICY. I -IA GOAL
WAS THE SAME AS THAT OF OTHER ALLIANCE MEM! ERS* BUT TH1! STARK FACT
WAS THAT IF USA POWER WAS REMOVED, THE REST OF THE WORT i WOULD
BE LIVING IN TERROR
CAMPBELL
1

000227

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="43">
          <name>Identifier</name>
          <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="42413">
              <text>CDBM00241</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="42416">
              <text>CanDelNATO to External 1241</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="42419">
              <text>5/1/1969</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="48">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="42422">
              <text>RG25-A-3-c, file 27-11-7, "DEFENCE - CONVENTIONAL AND NUCLEAR ARMAMENTS - ANTI - BALLISTIC MISSILES (ABM) = DEFENSE - ARMEMENTS DE TYPE CLASSIQUE ET NUCLEAIRE - ENGINS ANTIMISSILES (ABM)," vol. 10357, part 6, Library and Archives Canada, (LAC).</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="39">
          <name>Creator</name>
          <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="42425">
              <text>External Affairs</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="42428">
              <text>Canadian Crown</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="42431">
              <text>Anti-ballistic missiles</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="41">
          <name>Description</name>
          <description>An account of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="42434">
              <text>Ministerial Mtg DC- Special Session with President Nixon</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="45">
          <name>Publisher</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="42437">
              <text>Canada Declassified</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="42440">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="42">
          <name>Format</name>
          <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="42443">
              <text>PDF</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="44">
          <name>Language</name>
          <description>A language of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="42446">
              <text>en</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
