<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="5635" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/items/show/5635?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-08-21T08:22:11-04:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="3764">
      <src>https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/b3fec49795851edb306f9ca06ab6d3ea.pdf</src>
      <authentication>3e05509b6d441f4fcb1e4e25350e2581</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="31">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="131">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="37799">
                  <text>FlfflUsHDC 0 C T 1 6 / 6 7

SECRET

TO EXTER 3 7 7 3 PRIORITY
INFO DISARMDELGVA LDN PARIS BONN BRU HAGUE ROME
TT CANFORCEHED DE OTT NATOBRU MCOW DE LDN
USA-SOVIET TALKS ON LIMITATION OF STRATEGIC DELIVERY SYSTEMS
YOU WILL RECALL DEFENSE SECRETARY MCNAMARA INDICATED IN HIS QUOTE
POSTURE STATEMENT UNQUOTE JAN26 USA GOVT INTENDED TO TAKE NO RPT
NO ACTION AT THAT TIME TO DEPLOY ABM SYSTEM BUT TO INITIATE
NEGOTIATIONS WITH USSR DESIGNED TO LIMIT ABM DEPLOYMENT AND IF
THESE NEGOTIATIONS PROVED UNSUCCESSFUL TO RECONSIDER DEPLOYMENT
DECISION. A GOOD DEAL OF WATER HAS FLOWED UNDER THIS PARTICULAR
BRIDGE SINCE AND ABM DEPLOYMENT DECISION WHEN TAKEN WAS OSTENSIBLY ON OTHER GROUNDS. ACTUALLY MCNAMARA DID LEAVE OPEN OPTION
FOR DECISION ON GROUNDS OF POTENTIAL CHINESE QUOTE THREAT UNQUOTE
BY ALLUDING TO IT BUT CONCLUDING THAT GIVEN DIFFERENCES IN LEAD
TIME FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A SIGNIFICANT CHINESE OFFENSIVE CAPABILITY
AND THAT NEEDED FOR EFFECTIVE DEFENCE TIME F OR A DECISION HAD
NOT RPT NOT ARRIVED.
2 . YOU WILL ALSO RECALL REPORTED REACTION OF CHAIRMAN KOSYGIN WHEN
PRESIDENT JOHNSON INTERPRETED PUBLICLY FORMERS REPLY TO INVITATION
TO NEGOTIATIONS AS AGREEMENT TO DO SOCMCOW TEL419 MAR4). APART
FROM THIS DESPITE ABSENCE OF ANY REAL EVIDENCE OF SOVIET WILLINGNESS TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS RELATING TO LIMITATION OF STRATEGIC DELIVERY SYSTEMS USA OFFICIALS HAVE BEEN VERY CAREFUL
ABOUT GIVING ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE INTERPRETATION TO SOVIET
.••2

000155

�Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur I'acces a I'information

?fm

TWO 3 7 7 3 SECRET

FAILURE TO RESPOND TO USA INVITATION. AT SAME TIME SIGNALS HAVE
GONE UP INDICATING EXTENT OF USA FLEXIBILI TY. BOTH PRESIDENT AND
MCNAMARA INDICATED USA WOULD BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS BOTH OFFENSIVE
AND DEFENSIVE STRATEGIC DELIVERY SYSTEMS. FURTHERM ORE AND THIS HAS
BEEN AT EXPENSE OF CONGRESSIONAL CRITICISM MCNAMARA HAS RPTDLY
SPOKEN OF SURPLUS OVER NEED OF USA ICBM AND OTHER STRATEGIC
DELIVERY FORCES. FOR EXAMPLE IN HIS SEP 18 SPEECH ANNOUNCING ABM
DEPLOYMENT DECISION HE SAID QUOTE BLUNT FACT REMAINS THAT IF WE
HAD HAD MORE ACCURATE INFO ABOUT PLANNED SOVIET STRATEGIC
FORCES WE SIMPLY WOULD NOT RPT NOT HAVE NEEDED TO BUILD AS LARGE
A NUCLEAR ARSENAL AS WE HAVE TODAY UNQUOTE. ANOTHER SIGNAL
APPEARED IN SPEECH BY ASST DEFENSE SECRETARY WARNKE SPEECH
0CT6 WHEN HE SAID QUOTE IN CONSIDERING ANY POSSIBLE AGREEMENT
WITH USSR TO LEVEL OFF OR REDUCE STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE AND DEFENSIVE SYSTEMS OR EVEN POSSIBILITY FOR PARALLEL ACTION ON PART
OF TWO COUNTRIES WE MAY HAVE TO DEPEND ON OUR OWN UNILATERAL
CAPABILITY FOR VERIFICATION. WE BELIEVE A NUMBER OF POSSIBILITIES
FOR PARALLEL ACTION AND EVEN FOR FORMAL AGREEMENT WITH SOVIETS
WOULD PERMIT OUR RELIANCE ON UNILATERAL MEANS OF VERIFICATION
UNQUOTE.PERHAPS TO REASSURE HIS AUDIENCE BUT PRESUM ABLYCGIVEN
KNOWN SOVIET ATTITUDE TOWARDS ONSITE INSPECTION IN USSR)ALSO TO
INDICATE LIMITS OF AGREEMENT WITH USSR THAT WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE
WARNKE WENT ON QUOTE OTHER MORE FARREACHING AGREEMENTS PARTICULARLY
ANY INVOLVING SUBSTANTIAL REDUCTIONS WOULD REQUIRE AGREED INTERNATL
.

INSPECTION.

•—

—

•

•

000156

�Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur faeces a I'information
PAGE

THREE

3773

SECRET

YiflpiAY BE SURE THAT WE WOULD NOT RPT NOT ACCEPT ANY AGREEMENT
UNLESS WE HAD HIGH CONFIDENCE IN OUR ABILITY TO MONITOR SCVIET
COMPLIANCE EITHER BY UNILATERAL MEANS OR BY AGREED INSPECTION
PROCEDURES. BUT YOU MAY BE SURE ALSO THAT WE WILL PURSUE WITH
DILIGENCE AND DETERMINATION OUR EFFORTS TO BRING NUCLEAR ARMS
RACE UNDER CONTROL UNQUOTE.
!..•••

***

3.PERHAPS PATIENCE AND FORBEARANCE FROM PUBLIC STATEMENTS MAY
BE PAYING OFF. WHILE TOO MUCH SHOULD NOT RPT NOT BE READ INTO I T
WE WERE INTERESTED TO LEARN FROM MCAULIFFE OF STATE DEPT A FEW
DAYS AGO THAT QUESTION OF USA-SOVIET TALKS ON LIMITATION OF
STRATEGIC WEAPONS HAD BEEN RAISED BY SECRETARY RUSK WITH FOREIGN
MINISTER GROMYKO WHEN THEY MET ON EVE OF UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY IN
NY. ACCORDING TO MCAULIFFE GROMYKOS RESPONSE HAD BEEN THAT I T
WOULD NOT RPT NOT BE POSSIBLE UNTIL AFTER SOVIET 50 TH ANNIVERSARY
CELEBRATIONS. WHILE NOT RPT NOT MUCH OF A STRAW I T APPARENTLY

IS

BEING CLUTCHED AT HOPEFULLY IN STATE.
4. IN THIS CONNECTION WE WERE INTERESTED BY MCAULIFFES REF TO
SPRINT MISSILES AS POSSIBLY USEFUL FOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH RUSSIANS.
IT

I S EVIDENT THAT USA ADMIN I S NOT RPT NOT ANXIOUS TO INTRODUCE

THIS COMPONENT OF ABM SYSTEM WHICH WOULD CARRY WITH I T PRESSURES
FOR QUOTE THICKENING UNQUOTE OF BALLISTIC M I S S I L E DEFENSE
AND I S

ALLEGEDLY NOT RIPT NOT NECESSARY FOR CHIN A-ORIENTED

SYSTEM. AT SAME TIME WE WOULD THINK I T VERY DIFFICULT FOR USA TO
TRADE OFF THIS OPTION SO LONG AS CONGRESS AND MILITARY

ESTABLISHMENT

ARE PREDOMINENTLY IN FAVOUR OF QUOTE FULL UNQUOTE ABM DEPLOYMENT.
^_

,

.

•

000157

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="43">
          <name>Identifier</name>
          <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="37456">
              <text>CDBM00150</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="37459">
              <text>DC to External 3773</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="37462">
              <text>10/16/1967</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="48">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="37465">
              <text>RG25-A-3-c, file 27-11-7, "DEFENCE - CONVENTIONAL AND NUCLEAR ARMAMENTS - ANTI - BALLISTIC MISSILES (ABM) = DEFENSE - ARMEMENTS DE TYPE CLASSIQUE ET NUCLEAIRE - ENGINS ANTIMISSILES (ABM)," vol. 10357, part 3, Library and Archives Canada, (LAC).</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="39">
          <name>Creator</name>
          <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="37468">
              <text>External Affairs</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="37471">
              <text>Canadian Crown</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="37474">
              <text>Anti-ballistic missiles</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="41">
          <name>Description</name>
          <description>An account of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="37477">
              <text>USA-Soviet Talks on Limitation of Strategic Delivery Systems </text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="45">
          <name>Publisher</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="37480">
              <text>Canada Declassified</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="37483">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="42">
          <name>Format</name>
          <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="37486">
              <text>PDF</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="44">
          <name>Language</name>
          <description>A language of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="37489">
              <text>en</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
