<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="5230" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/items/show/5230?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-08-19T18:01:20-04:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="3549">
      <src>https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/1a8e5d5ee44b06e1ea62398ea5d29ad3.pdf</src>
      <authentication>03f3b6092ef453360481b0288f8269ac</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="31">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="131">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="33657">
                  <text>Document disclosed under the Access to information Act Document divulgu* en vertu de ta Loi sur tacces a I'information

7&gt;?A 7ft*

%

"fit
FM NATOPARIS SEP22/66 CONFD
TO EXTERNL 2005

^ ^ 1

-J

INFO LDN WASHDC EMBPARIS DISARMDELGVA PERMISNY BONN ROME
BAG HAGUE SRU OSLO COPEN DE PARIS MCOW WSAW PRGUE BGRAD DE LDN
REF OURTELS 1942 SEP15 1950 SEP15 1963 SEP16
NAC-DISARMAMENT j

T«HT

OlMl JWWUt *

TTftMT &amp;

OfW HQH V* «W

AS ANTICIPATED CHAIRMAN OF PAC GAVE COUNCIL ORAL REPORT YESTERDAY
ON LAST WEEKS PAC MTG WITH DISARMAMENT EXPERTS.REPORT WAS CLEAR
AND WELL BALANCED COMBINING BOTH PROCEDURAL ASPECTS OF MTG AND
SUBSTANCE OF DISCUSSIONS.HE SUMMARIZED MAIN POINTS OF DISCUSSIONS
UNDER VARIOUS AGENDA ITEMS&lt;SEE REFTELS)WHILE DRAWING TO COUNCILS
ATTN ISSUES WHICH DESERVED FURTHER CONSIDERATION OR STUDY.
2 . I N DISCUSSION WHICH FOLLOWED USA ACTING PERMREP SAID THAT RECENT
MTG HAS SIGNIFICANT LESSONS FOR ALLIANCE BECAUSECA)TECHNICAL
DEVELOPMENTS ARE DYNAMIC AND RESULT IN STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS FOR
NATO AND CB)TECHNICAL FACTS ARE IMPORTANT BECAUSE THEY HAVE
POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS AND POINT TO QUESTIONS ALLIANCE MUST
ANSWER.HE ALSO CONFIRMED THAT LAST WEEKS MTG WAS AN EXCELLENT
ONE WITH BENEFITS FOR ALL PARTICIPANTS AND HE WAS PLEASED THAT
SUBJECTS RECEIVED INTENSIVE EXAM BEFORE POLICY DECISIONS WERE
TAKEN.THIS WOULD BE VERY USEFUL TO HIS AUTHORITIES IN THEIR CURRENT
REVIEW.

MI1DJM M*J0*TJ*&lt;aJ*lUM* f JPOM

3.DUTCH PERMREP THEN MADE A NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS ON CERTAIN
PROBLEMS CONNECTED WITH AN ABM SYSTEM A NON RPT NON PROLIFERATION
TREATY AND A COMPREHENSIVE TEST BAN.&lt;HE PROMISED TO CIRCULATE VIEWS
.••2
ft.
000082

�Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur I'acces a I'information

PAGE TWO 2 0 0 5 CONFD
OF HIS AUTHORITIES ON THESE SUBJECTS.)REPORTED EFFECTIVENESS OF AN
ABM SYSTEM AGAINST MEDIUM RANGE NUCLEAR WEAPONS COULD HAVE IMPORTANT
IMPLICATIONS FOR WESTERN EUROPE AND FOR ALLIANCES NUCLEAR WEAPON
STRATEGY.IN DEALING WITH PROPOSAL FOR AMENDMENT OF USA DRAFT
NON RPT NON PROLIFERATION TREATY HE UNDERLINED THAT EXACT WORDING
OF PROPOSED DUTCH FORMULA DID NOT RPT NOT EXCLUDE POSSIBILITY
OF ALLIED NUCLEAR FORCE OR NUCLEAR SHARING.DUTCH PROPOSAL WAS
CONCERNED WITH PREVENTING ANY PRESENT ALLIED NUCLEAR POWER FROM
RELINQUISHING CONTROL TO AN ASSOCIATION OF STATES WHICH WOULD OWN
NUCLEAR WEAPONS.THE ONLY HARDWARE SOLUTION WHICH DUTCH WOULD
EXCLUDE I S ONE IN WHICH PARTICIPATING NUCLEAR POWER WOULD NOT
RPT NOT RETAIN ITS VETO.DUTCH PERMREP ALSO CONSIDERED THAT FURTHER
STUDY HAD TO BE MADE OF NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN NUCLEAR DETECTION
AND TO OTHER IDEAS RELATED TO A Cl6 BUT THOUGHT THAT OLD PROBLEMS
AND DEFECTS STILL REMAINED PARTICULARLY ON POLITICAL SIDE .
4.NORWEGIAN PERMREP EXPRESSED SUPPORT FOR RESTRICTIVE INTERPRESATION OF NON RPT NON PROLIFERATION CONCEPT BUT WAS NOT RPT NOT
YET CERTAIN THAT HE COULD ACCEPT IMPLICATION OF DUTCH AMENDMENT
DEALING WITH OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS.BELGIAN
PERMREP REITERATED VIEW THAT CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF NON RPT NON
PROLIFERATION CONCEPT WAS URGENTLY REQUIRED.ALTHOUGH BELGIUM
SUPPORTED DUTCH NON PROLIFERATION AMENDMENT TO EXCLUDE POSSIBILITY
OF TRANSFER OF CONTROL BY NUCLEAR COUNTRY TO ASSOCIATION OF STATES,
DISTINCTION BETWEEN OWNERSHIP OF WEAPONS AND USE WAS DIFFICULT
TO UNDERSTAND.A LEGAL ARGUMENT COULD BE MADE FOR THIS APPROACH
• ..3
000083

�Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur I'aqces a I'information

p

i
PAGE THREE 2005 CONFD
BUT IT WAS NOT RPT NOT POLITICALLY POSSIBLE TO MAKE SEPARATION.
ALLIANCE MUST DISCUSS THIS QUESTION,INCLUDING POSITION OF FGR
TO DETERMINE WHETHER LATTER WOULD BE SATISFIED WITH CONSULTATIVE
APPROACH ENVISAGED IN MACNAMARA PROPOSALS.BELGIAN PERMREP CALLED
FOR EARLY DISCUSSION OF ALL ASPECTS OF ISSUE WHICH HE RECOGNIZED
POSED SERIOUS PROBLEMS FOR FGR.
5.1 EXPRESSED GENERAL SUPPORT FOR DUTCH AND BELGIAN APPROACH TO
NON PROLIFERATION CONCEPT BUT TREATED WITH RESERVE DUTCH
INTERPRETATION IN PARA3 ABOVE WHICH WOULD HAVE TO BE EXAMINED
CAREFULLY WHEN CIRCULATED. I ALSO UNDERLINED IMPORTANCE OF TIMING
AND TACTICAL SITUATION IN GNEVA AND IN UN AS WELL AS RELEVANCE
OF CURRENT USA REVIEW IN MAKING CHANGES TO DRAFT TREATY.GERMAN
ACTING PERMREP LOOKED FORWARD TO COUNCIL DISCUSSION ON PROLIFERATION
CONCEPT.IT WAS LEFT TO CHAIRMAN TO FIND RIGHT MOMENT BASED ON
REQUIREMENTS OF WESTERN FOUR ENDC MEMBERS AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS.
ALL ABOVE MENTIONED SPEAKERS AS WELL AS DANISH UK AND ITALIAN
PERMREPS SUPPORTED IDEA OF COUNCIL DISCUSSION ON NON PROLIFERATION
IN FUTURE.
6.ALTHOUGH NO DATE HAS BEEN FIXED,SUCK A MTG ON NON-PROLIFERATION
IS LIKELY TO TAKE PLACE WITHIN NEXT TWO WEEKS.I SHOULD BE GRATEFUL
THEREFORE TO HAVE YOUR GENERAL GUIDANCE BY 0CT5 WITH PARTICULAR
EMPHASIS ON HOW TO HANDLE DUTCH QUALIFICATION TO AMENDMENT REFERRED
TO ABOVE
RITCHIE

000084

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="43">
          <name>Identifier</name>
          <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="32569">
              <text>CDBM00022</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="32572">
              <text>NATOParis to External 2005 </text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="32575">
              <text>9/22/1966</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="48">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="32578">
              <text>RG25-A-3-c, file 27-11-7, "DEFENCE - CONVENTIONAL AND NUCLEAR ARMAMENTS - ANTI - BALLISTIC MISSILES (ABM) = DEFENSE - ARMEMENTS DE TYPE CLASSIQUE ET NUCLEAIRE - ENGINS ANTIMISSILES (ABM)," vol. 10357, part 1, Library and Archives Canada, (LAC).</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="39">
          <name>Creator</name>
          <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="32581">
              <text>External Affairs</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="32584">
              <text>Canadian Crown</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="32587">
              <text>Anti-ballistic missiles</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="41">
          <name>Description</name>
          <description>An account of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="32590">
              <text>NAC- Disarmament </text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="45">
          <name>Publisher</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="32593">
              <text>Canada Declassified</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="32596">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="42">
          <name>Format</name>
          <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="32599">
              <text>PDF</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="44">
          <name>Language</name>
          <description>A language of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="32602">
              <text>en</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
