<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="267" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/items/show/267?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-03-07T07:47:24-05:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="312">
      <src>https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/72a52db5ab043fcc1b69209677f76a30.pdf</src>
      <authentication>add9e2a4a1e95d08365423cdfc7f1eb8</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="31">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="131">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2119">
                  <text>Document disclosed under the Access to tnf~r/;,°tion Ac
Document divulgue en.v~rtu de la

. j/S
JOINTINTELLIGENCE
CCNMITp
Extract from the minutes of the
held on

------

,·

----

/f

,fl/

-3-f'

SE 6'

LZ'.::cce/
ii

l'informat

,,

a.

meeting

,

(TOP SIDREr)
XI. CONCEPl'
.OF FtJrURE WARFARE
-~---· ---- -·-;;: ;h~- ~·~~;~;·hac1.-;~~-~~~~;_de;~~;_~~-JIC251/2(58)
dated -·- ----- --f
11
5 Feb 58., "The Nature of General 'War.,1965-70 •
(CSC 2156-1 and CSC 7-17 (JIC) of 6 Feb 58}

~

/

23 •. w/c Gordon doubted if we were in a position as yet to write
this paper. In view of the joint study. on the threat to North America., it
would be possible to prepare a pa.per on the nature of general warfare between __
_
the Soviet Union and North American nations.
However., in order to make
·
statements covering the nature of general warfare in Europe., a paper on the
threat to Europe would be required..
24. Brig. Rothschild stated that first of all it should be determined if there was a real requirement for this pa.per. If the pa.per was·written
it should be prepared in conjunction with the Planners as a paper on which
future planning could be based.· ·
25. Colo-Tate stated that the Army has already prepared a study
outlining the concept for the employment of the Army in the event of nuclear
or limited war.
26. Cdr. ,Stowell stated that the Naval Warfare Study Group has
also prepared a study covering the employment of the RONin Phase I of a
nuclear war up to 1960. This group was now engaged in enlarging the scope
of the original study to cover the employment of the RONin both nuclear
and limited war up to 1967. Since at least two services are already engaged
in unilateral
studies of this nature, there would seem to be a definite
requirement for an agreed paper to set the stage for more detailed individual
service studies if' conflicting and possibly overlapping concepts were to be
avoid'ed.

[',

27. Dr. Arnell noted that the individual service directors had
indicated that they had prepared such a paper for their own service.
He
considered that there must be a requirement for a paper embodying the views
of all services.

\

28. Col. Tate felt that the important thing from the point of view
of the Planners was courses of action.
29. The Chairman suggested that possibly a much larger study than
the Threat to North America paper was now required covering the threat to the
NATOarea., outside of North America., and perhaps this should precede the
writing of a paper on the concept of future warfare.

',i

'

JO. Brig. RothschiJd stated th~t the Army had pr~sented a btiefing
to a group of senior·officials
from the Deputy Minister's office, Department
of .Finance and DDP, the CNSand the CAS about two weeks ago on the Army
concept of war in the future.
Such a briefing could be useful to the JIC.
,-~
- --ting
that Committee to cons:i.ut;;.1:
uuv
·-'"1-reques
. g a combined services concept of future warfare
pa per coverin
t · b ti· on to make
and indicating
that intelligence
has a con ri u
to such a paper;
th JPC u1d indicate that the develop(b) that the memorandumto
·re uire the preparation of
ment of this concep~ po~~~b~vret thre~t to the NATO
area, less
a joint study covering
·
.
North America; and
. .
t B . g Rothschild to make enquiries and to arrange.,
i)L
(c) to reques
ri •
b i fin 0 f the JIC
if
ssible
for a combined services
re
g
000276
cov:ing individual service concepts of future warfare.

\

1

�Document disclosed under the Accessto tnf?r~a~'.on Act -.
Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur /'acces a I ,nformat10

•

.,

JOiltT INTELLIGENCE
CGOO.TTEE
.
t::

·

Extract from the minutes of

.

5 ¼

held on

a.,..,/

:.;

JI

t"'

---:'J
7

,~e -..::-•----

meeting

•

.......

\ ..,

'').'
,,.,1

(ToP·smRET)

X-i-i'I.--GONCm-OF-RurURE-WARFARE

Secretary

290 ·The··committee· had for consideration
of the JFC on this subjecto

a draft

memorandumto the·

lJ

(CSC 2156-1 (JIO) of 20 .Feb 58)

\

300 ·In the considerable diseu.ssion·which :followed, the.Committee
noted that the preparation of this joint study would entail the preliminarypreparation of joint papers on the threat to the NATO
area outside North
Americao The requirement., if anyg for these papers was consideredo It wasnoted that the information necessary to write the threat estimates would have
1 s support would be necessary to
to be obtained from SHAPEand that the CCOS
obtain the release of this :information. ·The majority of the members felt
that the COOSshould approve the preparation of the threat estimates to the
NATO.area outside North America prior to steps being taken to prepare these
estimateso

-·

3lo Capto Caldwell stated that the RCNhad a requirement £or a
joint estimate to assess the Soviet threat to western sea lines of communication in the Atlantic and Pacific and to shipping in North American coastal
waters during the period. 1958a67o
.
320 ·It was agreed thatg

\

{a)

parao 1 and sub,,,parae 3{c) would be deleted fro~ the draft
memorandumto the Secretary Jl'C;

(b)

DAI would advise at a £uture meeting as to whether ·the OAShad
a requirement for a joint paper to assess the Soviet threat to
the:Europea.n NATOarea during the period 1958-67;

( c)

DAI would also advise if the OASwould forward this requirement
to the Chiefs of Staff £or approval or whether it should be submitted to the Chiefs of Staff by the JIC; and

(d)

no further consideration would be given to the preparation of a
joint study on the concept of future warfare miless invited to
do so by the JPC or higher authorityo

I

-.~--·---

r (n

000271

�Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur /'acces ii /'information

~bJ
~·

cse

l{:tlc")

~1~i-

,,-""'--

TOP SECRET

DRAFT

Future

Warfare

1.
a possible

requirement

future

i'Eii-Wlll.general

on the

knowledge

already

been

agreed

that

which

for

warfare.

that

an important

contributioP

2.

It

was the

development
prepare
area

outside

to the

North

it

papers

on the

and missiles

same general

would be necessary
America

which

to

were not

The JIC therefore

3.

that

JIC/JPC

the

covered
requests

study

to
NATO

of the

threat

and would have

In addition,
threats

JPC views

of future

warfare

and

of threat

estimates

it

to North

~D&amp; joint

for

(a)

to the

would be complementary

America,

minor
in

had

a study.

to the

and structure.

study

of

intelligence

threat
papers

to North

approach

fram~

would be necessary

These

joint

had

The JIC

as a preliminary

a concept,

America.

lines

be d!;JH&lt;:;Q!fUprepared,

could

to make to such

recently-approved

from aircraft
the

studies

the

of

was based

serv5-ces.

and considered

JIC/JPC

concept

general

within

JIC 1 s view that,

of such

joint

concept,

service

required,

on these

by individual

a combined

was probably

service

The discussion

studies

undertaken

individual·

a combined

threat

on the

paper?'
requirement

up to~
with

(say)~
the

following

To assess
the Soviet
threat
area during the period
1958

to the European NATO
to 1967;
0JJe~~;c;p.J
I\
(b) ~o assess
the Soviet
threat
to~sea lines
of
~.~'?F!ffiEFJJC2:.t.tsw-2:UhJL.~
~9~~E3..!~if i c_!"i
"""N,.~G'..1o,,vd4V
during the period 1958 to 1967;

•-·

( C)

llv~

4.

If

will
for

To assess
the
from \_irborne
and slJlrersion
1958 to 1967.
these

be glad
these

proposals
to prepare

papers,

Soviet
threat
to North America
and amphibious
attack~,e:::stJ171:'Y!t::I
Zl!:i::8
and sabotage
during the period
are
for

acceptable
joj_nt

to the

cUscussion

JPC,
detailed

the

JIC

1

�Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Doc
ent ivulgue en vertu de la Loi sur /'acces ii /'information
IN REPLY

PLEASE

QUOTE

1!\epartment
of j}ational
JOINT INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE

20 Feb 58

MEIDRANDUM
FOR THE JIC
Conge;gt of Future Warfare

1.
I refer.to the decisions
meeting on this subjecto

or the

Committee at the 586th

2o
Attached is a copy of a draft memorandumto th~ Secretary,
Joint Planning Co•tteeo

3.
This draft memorandumwill be considered at the meeting
of the Committee on 26 Feb 58e

Enc.
GPH/2-5459/meb
cc.

CJS
CB NRG

JIS (5}

A

Cl

000273
V

�Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur /'acces ii /'information

CSC2156a-l(JIC)
TOPSECRET
20 Februa.ry 9 1958

Secreta.ry 9
Joint Planning Committee.
Conqept
1.

of Future Warfare

The JIC has considered a possible requirement for a

combined service

concept of future

general warfareo

was bas.ed on the knowledge that studies
already been 1.Urlertaken by individual

The discussion

on these general lines had
serviceso

The JIC -agreed that

a combined concep~9 within the framework of' which 'individual
studies

could be prepared

that intelligence

9

service

was probably required» am considered

had an-important

contribution

to make to such a

studyo
It was the JIC 9 s view that

2a

9

as a preliminary

to the

development of' such a concept 9 it would be necessary to prepare
joint JIO/JPC papers on the threat

to the NATOarea outsid~ North
•,.
.

.America. These papers would be complementary to the recently=
approved j-oint JIC/JPC study of' the- threat from airm-a.f't and missiles
to North .America9 and would have the same general approach and
structureo
threats

In addition

9

it would be necessary to study the minor

to North America which were not covered in the joint

threat

paper.
The JIC therefore

3.

requests

JPC views on the requirement

for a combined concept of' future warfare up to (say) 19f:r/9 and on
the preliminary

preparation

of threat

estimates

with the following

objectsz
(a)

To assess the Soviet threat

to the European NATO

area during the period 1958 to 19&amp;7,
11r.,,

(b)

To assess the Soviet threat

to 1Uestern sea lines

of communication in the Atlantic

and Pacific

and

to shipping in North American coastal waters
during ~he period 1958 to 19&amp;7i

"4

000274

I

�Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur /'acces ii /'information

TOPSECRET
( c)

To assess the Soviet threat

to North America from

I
I

airborne and amphibious attacks and subversion

I.

and sabotage during the period 1958 to

4.

1967.

If these proposals are acceptable to the JPC9 the JIC will

be glad to prepare for joint discussion detailed

formats for these

paperso

(GoPo Hartling)

·

Major
Secreiaryo

GPH/2=5459/j\Cl

000275

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="9">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="19">
                <text>Nuclear</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="262">
              <text>Concept of Operations /FEBRUARY 1958 (JIC AMENDMENTS)</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5949">
              <text>1958-02</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="42">
          <name>Format</name>
          <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5954">
              <text>PDF</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="44">
          <name>Language</name>
          <description>A language of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5959">
              <text>en</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5964">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="43">
          <name>Identifier</name>
          <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5969">
              <text>CDTT00115</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="48">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7601">
              <text>Joint Intelligence Committee minutes, "Extract from the minutes of the 586th meeting held on 19 Feb. 1958," LAC, RG 25, vol. 4903, file no. 50115-P-40, part 3; Memorandum from the JIC, "Concept of Future Warfare," 20 Feb. 1958, LAC, RG 25, vol. 4903, file no. 50115-P-40, part 3.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
