-
https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/0f3d74123f3706810981798fbd2f9342.pdf
98342793cb117e35b0e2e5052bc75d12
PDF Text
Text
Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act ■
Document divulge-en vertu de la Loi stir racces_a information
* ‘i •
. wI"t
COPY.: NO... ./ ...
4
C
. es - OTTAWA, MAY 9TH, 1952. '
' - WISER NO. . 31 2
..
.
tpo .
• 2
■ -
•
,U ’
"
/1... 5
.44
i ■:
s
/ TOR 3 :4 307/0 P.M. '
, ■ ,3 •$ '
*..
2 p
.
8*
e‘ J
2
4 -5
■
s
: ror. 8<)s pih..; .:
14
IM POR.T/ANT. >
' 1 VISER-TORSECRET-CYPHER-AUTO . .
. ■■
,* ,
P*
14*
'
.
(
-.=
.?
114
1
D4.
2
't
* ' T*n ...
.
.
20 . .
■' ", ..
..
Et
i2/0
OE MAY 7(7. '
."2—"*
)—7.
... / .
.
<)
FOLLOUING FOR : VRONG (WRONG FROM REID (RE ID, BEGINS
0
‘
"■•
-
).
..*
:
OURWISER; t e l e g r a ms '. Nos ; 42(4 2.0P ma y ' 33 AND 4343. 0 .
■ / REFERENCE,
"
' ir .
5 ;
•/—
■ ■-■
-
?.
-
■
‘‘**
*
. ‘
.
.
**—
.
— ■
*
2
8*t
--
...
:
_
•
1WE .ARE NOTNOT ENTIRELY HAPPY ABOUT .THE' RESULTS OFCONSULTAT ION :
1
.
.
.!
,
7
*
■
■
..
■ . .
‘
. .
...
' •
"-■MEETINGS". SO FAR, • WHICH WE ARE INCLINED TOEEEL STEM. LARGELY FROM" . _
..
.
-
..
.
..
-
.
.
•*,//
- 7
'
r
'■
.11
■
..
'
-
■
...
’■
' ;
: ' .
air.,
'
•
...
.
*.
' •’
.22
*
a
i
- j
EITHER THE UNWILLINGNESSOF THE UNITED’STATES AUTHORITIES TO. REVEAL
‘
'
■'
;
**
-
.
5
. .
1
•
:
f
•’•
.
.
4
■'
’
i
’■' ■
’
"ANYTHING SPECIAL TO US OR PERHAPS'.FROM THE FACT THAT THEY HAVE HAD .
.
NOTHINGVERY SPECIAL TO REVEAL. SO FAR. IN ANY CASE, IT IS PERHAPS ■ ;
T00 MUCH TO EXPECT THAT PERIODIC DISCUSSIONS,-SHOULD AT ANY PARTICULAR.' ’ ' '
=I
-jui - .. -
1
' '
52is 014 -
' '
’
,
/ •
' r-
:
.
:. r
•
15 213 . i •■ 231 1 \ .01 .54204*in
.
.. : . . :
6—
4
g7itsm
:
■"
.—SESSION REVEALVERY MUCH THAT IS NEW.
28 . * I "
. ..2. * ON "THE OTHER HAND, WE AGREE WITH YOU THAT WE SHOULD DO OUR BEST To- KEEP UPTHELPR ACT ICE AND’’ TO MAKE EACH SESSION AS FRUITFUL AS 1
- 1 : .22.1 , >
..
_
* / . it
- POSSIBLE .-■'-THE.. PROCEDURE. OF/CONSULT AT I ON INDEEDMAY BE OF MORE . . s
. POTENTIAL IMPORTANCE THAN ir HAS, -SEEMED' So FAR; SINCE IT OFFERS- SOME .
HOPE THAT IF THE INTERNATIONAL SITUATION VERE TO CHANGE SER IOUSLY' FOR; 0 - '
. THE WORSE WE WOULD HAVE.' ABTER-OPPORTUNITY OF "FINDING /OUT u.s. _ ■
" ' •' VIEWS .THAN: IF CONSULTATION HAD NOTC NOT BECOME ESTABLISHED PRACTICE. .
7 3. ? WITH REGARD TO THE FORTHCOMING MEETING,) WE ARE INCEINEDWTO THNKG • •
THAT A TOUR DYHORIZON BY, NITZECNITZE SHOULD. PROVIDE A USEFUL STARTING. ’
•
■
” " '
" •
POINT,
4
.
■
412
V*
'
..
.
’ t
.
•j,
"111 3 .
.
.
,
-
*
.
'
-
.i
,
.
"
ip WOULD BE USEFUL TO-KNOU Wh e t h e r
1
J t
*.′
44
"
!
′*
■
'
.
,5**
.
..
■
* :'
'
,
i.
J "4
t
”
'
'
.
“
*
-
. -
t h e .-u n it e d .- s t a t e s
2
**
•
-
V
***.
2.*
3 ■ 4 . " •
- ■
'
. '
*.*
::
“ ■ AUTHORITIES CONS IDER THAT INTERNATIONAL TENSION HAS, MATERIALLYINCREA-
,
SEDAS A’RESULT OF • THE-STALEMATE OVER ■. ARMISTI CE. NEGGTATIONS '■ IN KORE AC
" .
S .4tmdm00* : .b . ■ ■ KOREA, THE COMING INTO FORCE- OF THE JAPANESE PEACE TREATY AND THE .
;
.
'PROBABLE'EARLY 'COMPLETION OF THE- NEGOTIATIONS FOR-ED.C AND' CONTRACTUAL '.
. ARRANGEMENTS WITH GERMANY. I GATHER FROM YOUR TELEGRAM NO. 43 (43 THAT
' THEY DO NOTCNOT WISI TO DISCUSS .KOREA. HOWEVER, A LITTLE PROBING ON YOUR '' PART AS TO THE ANTICIPATED NEXT STEPS.
-. - -= L >
...
■.
.
/
00202
�Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act -
FC
! $4
$.
• .3
2
i*
/ -t J
" ‘*
.%*
#*
2710151 .**
WISER. NO. 31.
I,
,
'
.
-
,
■
MomogeeeNNe-LOGWWOUUUOMeWon
—-PAGE TWO
—
WISER-TOP-SECRET
_ '
- 2,* •
_
*t
•
:.t . . ,4 . : : s
2 ‘ ■
< • .
" C
*" 2 E ' .
. s —. }
..STEPs.
STBYTHE COMMUNISTS MIGHT BE FRUITFUL. WE EXPECT TO SEND YOU A/ •
/ SEPARATE TELEGRAN ONKOREA, BEFORE THE END OF HE WEEK AND.THISA-MIGHT : .
' ‘
1*.
,
’
'
.
■ '
■
•
‘
".*
at
.
..
.
$
‘ -
/
3
. . SERVE FOR : PURROSES . OF D IS CUSS ION. ALTERNAT IVELY, ■ YOU .MAY VIsHTO" . '.
< . POSTPONE DTSCU-SUION^-OF THE FAR EAST: UNTILUTHE: SECOND;'CONSULTATION''' * . '
: . MEETING, WHICH I' GATHER WILL BE .HELD BEFORE LONG. Y : * '" A . ' • \
: *4. FOR,TAE PRESENT SESSION ITMIGHT BE USEFUE TO CONCENTRATE ON4. . . ■,
■/
..
T
-• 2
.
s0ti
•’
.
5,
*-
...
-*...
.
7,—7. ‘
.
.
•**.
7*’
*
•
’ ’
, -
-*
*2.
•
i
**-*
- - ■
.
.
■
*.
...
.
: „ . .2 4 3 ; / . ,: . . 2 r • :
* ■
. . — 7 . .2 :• .
-**
:
,
$7,0
***
..
. POSSIBLE DEVELOPMENTS INEUROPE ARISING FROM NEGOTIATIONS WITH . •*
.. . .WESTERN GERMANY. ONE OF THE RELEVANT QUESTIONS WHICH HAS BEEN BOTHERING
i f ■ US IN CONNECTIONWITH POSSIBLE SOVIET' REACTIONS' TO THE-..CONG LUS'I ON; QFTE • '
. ■
1
.
’ .
1
-
a
J .
‘%
*
r_ • ,
.**
.
1
. •
■
’
.
-
/ '. ■
: '• .
..
,
...
.%
:
1*
■
■ :
- ' ,
---.**
.
: ■
•
■
-
-
..
hh : EDC TREATY AND; CONTRACTALARRANGEMENTS WITH. GERMANY IS THE TIMING.OP i .
15 " SUCH RUSSIAN MOYES’AS MIGHT BE ANTICIPATED. WHAT I HAVE IN MIND SPECIFI“*
■
-
.
r*
—==--==--=-==========e=======remenann* 1mnim nalt .
. -
..
*
ii ' "iin i ■
1
CALLY IS THE ESTIMATE OT WHEN THE GREATEST. DANGER WOULDCBE LIKELY TO 00 . ;
.
T .1
' ' ' ’
/.
'• :
. .
• :
4*.
2‘
‘
•
• -
.
'
...
1
'
0 CUROF SOVIET MILITARY) COUNTER-ACTION. THIS IS -BQUND-UP WITH THE" ''
. 2 , *
, . .
*
2 .
. ... —
. ... ..
■■ •
. ASSESSMENTOF WHETHER THE CURRENT SOVIET INITIATIVE; ON GERMANY REPRESEN...
1 — WHAT MIGHT BE CALLED A LAsf ..BLD" FOR A GERMAN" SETTLEMENT, OR IS MERELY ’ 1 ’
. e A REACTION to THE IMMINENT SUCCESS OF THE ALLIED POLICY or
: —
4 " INTEGRATING VEST GERMANY IN WESTERN EUROPEAN DEFENCE, DESIGNED TO _ ' ;
.
1 2
! . " ■ 1" - ‘A ..
c ,4 ..
• ■• . y ':
:433 3 - ’■ r ■ k
i * .
*
8.,)
' 7
' . i : DETER THIS PROCESS BUT NOTNOT PRESAGING ANY VERY VIOLENT SOVIET : -■ .
- REACTION IF INTEGRATTON’IS ACHIEVED. "•
.**
,20—nr
’
‘***
•
.
;•’
•
.
‘-y*
'.
****
•
•**
- .
J
.
n*;
I
‘w
.
„-*
:■ *
' 17"* 15 ‘ s
•
'
" -
■ \ 5. • ASSUMING FOR THE: MQMENZ THAT THE RUSSIANS VILL TAKE SOME FURTHER .
— ACTION TO COUNTER THE SUCCESSFUL CONCLUSION. OF THE EDC AND 3 d '■
CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS, WE SHOULD BE INTERESTED IN, THE.UNITED STATES "
: *. • ESTIMATE OF- BOTH VHEN
AND WHERE SUCH ACTION IS LIKELY TO TAKE PLACE .
=============-=========-- .-- -=============================.-=- : ANDAW/HETHERT WOULD 'BE OFSUCH -A NATURE AS TO ENHANCE THE RISK® oF .
.
5 . ?*/
0"**. 1" .
.
GENERAL WAR .FOR EXAMPLE, Is • IT CONSIDERED.
-
>
■■
3
.
...
:
.
-
...*.**
.* *
-
:
'
.
.
.
;
:
..
■
.
, 1 “2 •''
i
‘*2..................................
■’
:
"'■.
.
.
:■
:
■
.
T,
" ;
■■
’
.
.
224
•
■
■ ■
■
■
.
z.
.
..
ML
|
%.
00203
.
�Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act ■
Document divulge en vertu de la Loi surl’acces a /’information
*
. « . .. .
- - ■
.
/
- 1 ~ • •
*
WISER.
NO; r31.
2l"p
**
,
/ 7
"L
1. * . '
A,WISER-TOP-SECRET '
PAGE THREE— "
<
-
■ :
.
'.CONS IDERED:
2
.
. .
" ■'
$
LIKE -'EY.1
THAT IT' WOU LD. TAKE
‘
.
'
t ■ .=
. A 1
"
151:s
.
' ■■
0*
. . .
..
: JTHE. FORMOF RENEWED PRESSURE ON BERLIN QR VIENNA? / WILL TRE
POSSIBILITY OF ACTION AND THEREFORE THE RISK OF WAR BE GREATEST . 1 '
"BEFORE RATIFICATION OrTAE NEW ; ARRANGEMENTS IMMEDIATELY \ AFTER, 1 at P ; :
Y " ;
n .
. .4 .1
is 2 ■ . 0 • 1 . ' '
RATIFICATION.
OR'
SOMETIME
BETWEEN
THEN'
AND
THE
DATE
ON..
WHICH THE GERMAN
»
.
-' *
*7
'*
.
'
. .
*- *
•:
••
,*
: 'CONTRIBUTION ro THE EDC: MIGHNBD CONSIDERED AS: TAKING EFFECTIVE SHAPE? • :
50* .. .* :
• " -0300
. .
, .
.:6. YOU. HAVE ALREADY NOTED.THEQESTION OF THE CONSEQUENCES OF A. . . !
16
'
.
*1.2.4 .
*” .
. :
./
. BREAKDOWNOF THE PRESENT NEGOTIATIONS. IT WOULD, ALSO BE .USEFUL TO Y .: 1 -
20—ELICIT THE STATE: DEPARTMENT’S VIEWS IN THE CONSEQUENCES OF A FAILURE ? .. ■.
*4; SN.THEPRT
OF THE, BUNDESTAG
TORATIEYTHE.CONTRCTSANDTHEN
EDC TREATY. :
...
-,3
.•
.
' ; - \
1
- . ;
24
.
■
’ ■
‘
■
,
:
UCHADEVELOPMNTWOULD I SHOULD THINKWBE A-SEVEREBLOU BOTETO./
* ; : 5 "1.3 2 . . ’ •■■■• . 4.78 23
.T
; .
Q
" <..
25 ■" -..r - ■. .
' .1 V'. ■ ) :
14.4
:
NATO (NATO -PRESTIGE - AND THE NATO DEFENCE STRUCTURE . IT-WOULDBE . . ■
i
)
“ . 2 2
"a ! .
INTERESTING TO KNOW WHETHER FHE STATE DEPARTMENT HAVE: GIVEN THOUGHT ‘ ,
TO ANY, ALTERNATIVE COURSE OF ACTION SHOULD THE EDC BE DEFEATED IN THE ' •
*** • ‘ r -* ' .
L.
** * .
.
2 47 0 1.4.*A 00 ; / , 1075,
. ,
: BUNDESTAG OR THE FRENCH ASSEMBLY OR ALTERNATIVELY, IF. THE RESULT OF THE n " o" * " . F{
*) _ : . ... . 3- daif ■• B .
. . VOTE IN ONE, OR BOT+ LEGISLATURES VERE FO POSTPONE INDEFINITELY A " n
23
; ' IMPLEMENTATION Of EDC
n
. : n 7." tIALLY,"LTHouHYOU MAY.Nor, NOT CONS IDER' TH IS , Al LEGITIMATE . . :
id \ 11-52. . " o : “4 3 12rnd .. - - .
'
d . QUESTIONIN
THEWPRESENT
CONTEXT
ANATTEMPT
MIGHT
BE
MADETO
DRAWTHE
.
';
•
′
.
■ ■
...
/.,*i
*
. ′,. "d
* :7
...
"
•
"8,*
.
.′**
2,,
7.2
.
24257*7
.*
‘
’
... STATE DEPARTMENT-OUT ON WHAT PLANS THEY HAVE, IF ANY, IN THE EVENT. THAT- .
1 2 THE- RUSS IANS'.'.S'HOULD'1''AGREE ;f , AN "ACCEPTABLE: BASIS FOR THE HOLDING of . 9y0
7 e- . 15.2
7 " 1 212 1 212]* .00 0 .
- ALL-GERMAN ELECTIONS. *, "39 '■ ■ .. . j 2 . _ — 47 " '■ • ■ y",
, 008/005"* ilanpa . . . . *.1 - -0 ' 1
"SSA..
0 8. .WE ARE SENDING YOU BY BAG UNDER NUMBEREDLETTER NO. 858(858 OF. SS .
■
• C
MAY 99 A DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM-ONGERMANY WICH, ALTHOUGH NOTONOT - ■
; " .
,
7*
'
"
”■ ,
’ ” s•. . „
..-0]
..
*
-20
■
.1 '
1
..*
’ ' 7 "
V •** ■
**
**
' " YET CLEARED; VITHTHE MINISTER^ MAYGIVE YOU SOME SUGGESTIONS TOR. A
• . ?
-
■
DISCUSSION ON GERMANY. ENDS. MESSACEL ENDS
- 7 ii8
F
r.35 :
F
4.
7
,00204
�
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
CDNW (Wiser)
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
CDNW16847
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
CDNW16847
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Wiser Consultations, RG25-B-2, Volume number: 3095, Library and Archives Canada.