<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="215739" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/items/show/215739?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-09-10T12:34:10-04:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="193668">
      <src>https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/a7ff9dd6db156909d7f36d0e61147be4.pdf</src>
      <authentication>b36b1fd22d2555eff4a579ec569bd429</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="31">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="131">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2057391">
                  <text>Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue m v ^ ^ f c l g ^ f j u g ' t ^ J s - f t I'information

fc^j/^*Vtm^?^p-...j&amp;Tl

, :,*...-. ^5*in.sftKfcfes-xety^M

iTc *2 / O - /^ {— &lt;/^0 I
~ f ( ? SECRET

§»

^4—

fLmf

July 17, 1962.

MEMORANDUM FOR FILE
U.S. - Canada Defence Relations.
When Mr. Willis Armstrong, the Charge of the
U.S. Embassy, paid his farewell call on the Minister this
morning he referred to the fact that some problems existed
in our defence relations, particularly in respect of Bomarcs,
interceptors, etc.
2.
Mr. Armstrong expressed the hope that the Minister
and the Prime Minister might have an Opportunity to read
the paper which the U.S. military authorities had supplied
to the recent meeting of the Permanent Joint Board on
Defence. This paper expressed the military views of the
United States on the problem of atomic warheads for some of
these weapons.
3.
Mr. Green indicated that the question of the
acquisition of nuclear warheads by Canada was even more
difficult now than it had been before the election. He
remarked that if a liberal government were to be formed
it would take at least as hard a line on these matters.
4.
Mr. Green stated that the Government had not
discussed these issues since the election but he personally
wondered whether it might be possible to work out something
which would enable Canada to secure warheads "in a hurry"
if that became necessary. While the NDP would no doubt
object to even this kind of an arrangement, it seemed
possible that the Liberals might be able to go along with
it. Mr. Green did not know whether it would be acceptable
to the Canadian Government but he thought the possibility
worth looking into.
5Mr. Armstrong considered that the question of
atomic weapons was one of the most troublesome issues
between the two countries. If some progress could be made
on it the atmosphere would be substantially improved.
6.
Mr. Green observed that Canada was not alone in
having difficulties over the acquisition of nuclear weapons.
In fact, much the same kinds of problems had arisen in
virtually every case where there had been a suggestion of
locating weapons in foreign countries where the governments
of those countries were expected to take some responsibility
for the control of such weapons. The difficulties had been
avoided in only those cases where the United States had
been allowed to install weapons which remained under their
own control. Mr. Armstrong agreed that the tvrablems relating
to the acquisition of nuclear weapons were &lt;%l£££e peculiar to
Canada but they took on a different appearance when they
occurred in ahcountry so close as Canada.
7.
The Minister enquired again towards the end of the
conversation about the possibility of the United States'

yr%y,'u
ti.i.i^y

. .2

002496

�Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur I'acces a I'information

- 2 authorities studying the feasibility of an arrangement
for the quick delivery of warheads for use in Canads$T^ t~r*~2fr etf
Mr. Armstrong thought the paper submitted to the PJPD
set out quite clearly the military difficulties in such
an arrangement. The comments presented to the PJPD were
based of course on purely military considerations. If
the United States Government were to be asked for its view
as a government, those comments might be modified by
important political considerations. The political as well
as military possibilities might be well worth looking into
if the Canadian Government so desired. Mr. Armstrong did
not consider, however, that the United States Government
could volunteer an appraisal of the case. In his view
the initiative now rested with the Canadian Government.

xjpyi—A.E.R.

cc. Mr. R. Campbell

002497

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="43">
          <name>Identifier</name>
          <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2057394">
              <text>CDNW17403</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2057397">
              <text>"U.S.-Canada Defence Relations," memorandum for file</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2057400">
              <text>17-Jul-62</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="48">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2057403">
              <text>Continental defence - Atomic capability, RG25-A-3-b, Volume number: 5931, File number: 50210-F-40, File part: 8.2</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
