<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="215619" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/items/show/215619?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-08-15T09:44:23-04:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="193548">
      <src>https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/4429a5928464f4ce3dbcdb1ea3fd8502.pdf</src>
      <authentication>b9ba24d4b32a2782f33615fa194dc6e1</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="31">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="131">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2056791">
                  <text>.

’

1

■

.

Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulg en vertu de la Loi surl'acces a /'information

■

\ "

g.

; c

■ L

=:

; COPY NO.

A

* WISER NO. 27

• s

.. OTTAWA, "MARCH 8, 1952..

257P.M.

TOR:

TOD: 3/0. P.M..

5

' -

-—

CYPHER - AUTO

TOP SECRET-

pi : 10% 6-a, . ■ ‘ .. .

n :: . • :

;.

REFERENCE-:. OUR WISER TELEGRAM NO. 26(26 OF MARCH 6(6 AND OUR WISER. '

4

207

.

j.

-

* t

.

•

LETTER NO.8(8 OF MARCH 7(7. ...

. 7 ■
-

.

. '

/

.

• 5. .

■■ .

.

.

}.

- SUBJECT; DOCUMENTS RELATING TO, THE FORTHCOMING MEETING ON MARCH 10(10.
.7 FOLLOWING FOR, WRONG FROM HEENEY, BEGINS: '

■

6 "

2

’ '

MY. LETTER-UNDER REFERENCE TRANSMITS A COPY "oF. EACH OF THE

i(.

. VARIOUS' DOCUMENTS PREPARED' HERE THIS PAST WEEK THAT BEAR ON THE SUBJECT

I REGRET THAT THE'•COURIER-.'SCHEDULE IS .SUCH. THAT IT

AOF THE MEETING.

" AN ENVELOPE MARKED: gw(ngn IN BAG NO. 1000100) WILL-NOTNOT ARRIVE
*-

o**

'

'

.

• •

UNTIL NOON .ON MONDAY.

.

•■

0

’

,

•

,

-*‘*

.

,

*
•
*-*

■•

-

•

.

l.d

‘'

"**

••-

. THE PAPER DATED MARCH 4C4 IS PRETTY WELL.SELF.EXPLANATORY, AND

i ’• 2(2.

\ IT WAS- OUR • EXPECTATION THAT • IT WOULD. CONSTITUTE THE MI NISTER ’ S BRIEF
■

-

'

"sat

...

■ {

n

. ).3

•

'

-

*“

.

.

'

■

.

.

•

.

.

t

-

-

a

.

••

•

•*

7

...

'

.

4 FoRTHE MEETING. WHEN IT WAS DISCUSSED IN .THE ‘PRIME ^MINISTER’S; OFF ICE
1 ON-MARCH 5 (5, MR, PEARSON’AND MR.- CLAXTON APPEARED. MORE OR LESS\ ;

: . " Y . . .

:

h 303. THE-PRIME MINISTER, HOWEVER,'..QUESTIONED ".THE PROPRIETY'OF

•

f . SATISFIED WITH ITS CONTENTS? r
1

*
-

-

'

4..

d '. : . —
' '’

-

0

'

.

*

5.

..

•

ENTERING INTO ANY "AGREEMENT" BETWEEN GOVERNMENTS; ■-'.UNDER' -OUR'
.

, ' ..

..

7

.

■

.

■

1

-

’:

■

F.

.

‘

'

-’j

. CONSTITUTIONAL PRACTICE AGREEMENTS ENTERED INTO' BY'THE'-GOVERNMENT'-

■

'

■

-

..•

..

′$

"

**

.

:

■'

’

-2

■

.

.

*.

'.SHOULD, AT LEASTIN GENERAL TERMS BE REPORTED TO PARLIAMENT. SUCH A
.. COURSE DID NOKNOT APPEAR POSSIBLE IN THIS CASE.-

2

4(4.
$

.

.

•
...

!

IN ORDER TO MEET THE PRIME MINISTER
,1

-

.

.

■

■

... .
.

■■'

)

.

-

y

00088

�Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulge en vertu de la Loi surl’a'cces a /'information

f ■,
■■

(

*6**
.
■

A

. TOP SECRET

- PAGE TWO

. WISER NQ.. 27 :

POINT, IT WAS SUGGESTED,

. .PRIME MINI STER * s;..:
,

.

1

-

THAT, WHILE. AN- INTERGOVERNMENTAL. AGREEMENT WAS PROBABLY INAPPROPRIATE,
.

-

'

’

.

.

.

.:

■

-*

•

.

’

THERE MIGHT BE NOC NO .REASON- WHY. THE PROPOSED ARRANGEMENTS SHOULD ■

: :
•

.

■'

I

NOTCNOT BE EMBODIED IN: A SETOF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES APPROVED BY
• •

-*/.

.. I

.

..

'

'

..*

‘

l ,

•

..

**

J ■

.

.

MINISTERS AND" COMMUNICATED TO THE UNITED STATES. FURTHER DISCUSSION
LED TO .THE SUGGESTION,THAT SUCH PROCEDURES COULD BE LAID DOWN' AS .

'

. .REGULATIONS ESTABLISHED: BY (PRESUMABLY) THE •.MINISTER OF NATIONAL &lt; ’ .

)-

DEFENCE .UNDER: AUTHORITY • GRANTED HIM 'EITHER IN ' THE ' POWERS ASSIGNED: : : :'.

TO-HIS OFFICE OR IN THE PROVISIONS OF SPECIFIC EXISTING LEGISLATION.
: ' DOUBTLESS SUCH '-LEGISLATION WAS THE ..'SOURCE OF,. AUTHORITY FOR THE .
■

■

.

■’

’

■

•

**7*_*

■

:

•

.

-

REGULATIONS GOVERNING NON-ATOMIC FLIGHTS' ISSUED TO IMPLEMENT THE ' 7: s . '

.

' •.

‘

\

‘5. 1 "

907

, r; .

:■

’

g

.**

-RECOMMENDATION -OF THE P. J. B/D; APPROVED BY CABINET DEFENCE
....

'

. -COMMITTEE ON. DECEMBER 12(12.
.,****

•

.

‘

--**

.

.*

.

•

'

•
,

. ■

•

■

•

■ ■•

■

1

.
**

. .

,

,

r .

■

,

-

J

.

-

.
,

5(5. " THIS PROBLEM - CONCERNS, THE' CONSTITUTIONAL POSITION OF THE ’

•

1 ’: ..GOVERNMENT , AND DOES NOT (NOT, WE THINK : AFFECT THEARRANGEMENTS •
■

'

.

- -

'

.

'

■

i

.

■ -•

...

.

WHICH WE HOPE. WILL BE SETTLED WITH THE'U.S. AUTHOR ITIEM THE QUESTION :

6,

OF HOW THESE ARRANGEMENTS WILL BE .PUT INTO EFFECT MAY BE' REGARDED AS :

: ONE TO BE SETTLED IN OTTAWA. NEVERTHELESS, YOU SHOULD KNOW OF THIS .
. 3

ASPECT OF THE SITUATION WHICH EXPLAINS MY . EXCHANGE OF LETTERS WITH
TOULKESC FOULKE S AND THE FORM OF THE' RESULTING SCHEDULE..‘ - AS THESE PAPERS

■

WERE PREPARED BEFORE THERE: HAD BEEN ADEQUATE. TIME TO ASSESS THE

.

. IMPLICATIONS OF THE QUESTIONS RAISED BY THE PRIME.MINISTER-, THEY MAY.' .

\ NOTCNOT BE,.'.ENTIRELY CONSISTENT; THEY; SERVE, HOWEVER, TO INDICATE THE '

1.’. LINE OF THOUGHT NOW HELD HERE.' ENDS.; MESSAGE ENDS. / :

*,

J &gt;

'■f

■■■.

)

/
00089

2

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="43">
          <name>Identifier</name>
          <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2056794">
              <text>CDNW16894</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2056797">
              <text>Wiser No. 27, teletype from WashDC to External</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2056800">
              <text>08-Mar-52</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="48">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2056803">
              <text>Wiser Consultations, RG25-B-2, Volume number: 3095</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
