<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="213875" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/items/show/213875?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-09-11T23:45:37-04:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="191768">
      <src>https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/e61de67678953bdd72e16a90119f7f2b.pdf</src>
      <authentication>4eee95984ec9995ac870f7306245f18b</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="31">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="131">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2034599">
                  <text>Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act ""Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur I'acces a I'information

est ewcH'i WnMB*

FM WASHDC 0 C T 2 2 / 6 5 CONFD
TO EXTERNAL 3 3 9 1 IMMED

I0NCO

D-Cfl,

a2

INFO NATOPARIS EMBPARIS LDN DISARMDELGVE BONN B
REF YOURTEL DL1910 OCT21 AND OU
OURTEL 3 2 8 9 OCTlS

\

nn

._

nil

NATO CTTEE OF DEFENCE MINISTERS
WE CALLED THIS AFTERNOON ON SPIERS WHO WAS ABLE TO^SrTED' A L H # D E
MORE LIGHT ON USA THINKING WITH REGARD TO AGENDA FOR DEFENCE M I N I S TERS MTG. AT SAME TIME WE GOT IMPRESSION THAT USA OFFICIALS STILL HAVE
ONLY A GENERAL IDEA OF DIRECTION THEY WOULD LIKE TO SEE MTG T A K E ' A N D
ARE ONLY BEGINNING TO CONSIDER WHAT SPECIFIC SUGGESTIONS THEY MIGHT
WISH TO PUT FORWARD.
2 . S P I E R S SAID INSTRUCTIONS HAVE BEEN SENT TO CLEVELAND SETTING FORTH
THEIR SUGGESTIONS ON AGENDA ALONG SAME GENERAL LINES HE MENTIONED

..

DURING OUR PREVIOUS CONVERSATION* SEE OUR REFTEL).USA APPROACH
REFLECTED IN AGENDA WAS VERY MUCH THAT TRADITIONALLY FOLLOWED BY'- "a
MCNAMARA IN HIS HANDLING OF USA DEFENCE PROBLEMS. IT WAS RECOGNIZED :
THAT ATHNS GUIDELINES SET FORTH GENERAL PRINCIPLES REGARDING NATO .
CONSULTATION BEFORE DECISION TAKEN TO USE NUCLEAR WEAPONS* IT WAS .ALSO RECOGNIZED THAT PRACTICAL PROBLEMS OF IMPLEMENTING ATHNS;^
GUIDELINES HAD NEVER REALLY BEEN EX AM IN ED. MCNAMARA APPROACH WAS
FIRST TO HAVE ACCURATE SURVEY OF EXISTING FACILITIES AND C A P A B T -

,,.

LITIES WHICH HAD BEARING ON THIS BASIC QUESTION. NEXT STEP WOULD THEN'

I.

BE TO CONSIDER WHETHER EXISTING CAPABILITIES ARE ADEQUATE AND IF
NOT RPT NOT HOW THEY MIGHT BE IMPROVED.
3.TURNING TO THREE MAIN TASKS WHICH MIGHT BE CONSIDERED INITIALLY
•

BY CTTEE, SPIERS SAID BROSIO WOULD BE ASKED BY CLEVELAND TO, "p

p

» •

'.,,.
000121

. . . 2

�B8ErJffl!Ht Eli§El8i!El UHElSF thl d t f fS ft f#8ffflB*f8fl Act:

BEST ORIGINAL AVAILABLE
MElUEuR ORIGIHAL

a

PAGE TWO 3 3 9 1
REQUEST THAT ^ # ¥ 6 NATO MILITARY AUTHORITIES BE GIVEN RESPONSIBILITY
FOR PREPARING REPORTS WHICH WOULD CONSTITUTE DOCUMENTATION FOR
DISCUSSION AT FORTHCOMING MINISTERIAL MTG. INTENTION WOULD BE TO •
HAVE NATO MILITARY AUTHORITIES PROVIDE FACTUAL INFO REGARDING .
ALLIED PARTICIPATION IN NUCLEAR PLANNING, EXISTING COMMUNiCATION FACILITIES, AND OTHER QUESTIONS RELATED TO TASKS SET CUT IN USA
SUGGESTED AGENDA. IN REPLY TO CUR QUESTION SPIERS SAID THEY WERE
THINKING IN- TERMS OF MILITARY CTTEE AND STANDING GROUP MAKING THIS

y'

INFO AVAILABLE IF POSSIBLE TWO WEEKS BEFORE MTG. IN USA VIEW THESE

. ;" •" •

REPORTS FROM MILITARY AUTHORITIES COULD BE CIRCULATED TO GOVTS

.'.

ATTENDING MTG AND IT WAS HOPED THAT MINISTERS WOULD FIND THEM

pa-.

"'

'^3-

&lt;•

P p •-.

• ••' '

4

USEFUL AS BASIS FOR COMMENTING OR MAKING ANY SUGGESTIONS ON E X I S T &amp; &amp; • * '
1

.a' * •

ARRANGEMENTS OR. ON POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENTS. SPIERS SAID USA AUTHORITIES.^.'
DID NOT RPT NOT HAVE ANY SPECIFIC SUGGESTIONS TO PUT FORWARD

"' •

' *§.

AT THE MOMENT AND THEY WOULD BE AWAITING RECEIPT OF REPORTS .FROM •

'&gt;&gt;'
p"i. r • •

MILITARY AUTHORITIES BEFORE THEY WORK OUT ANY FIRM SUGGESTIONS FOS ''".•"'
MCNAMARAS CONSIDERATION.

'

• .

4.DURING OUR CONVERSATION SPIERS STRESSED A NUMBER GF'.TIHJSS-.

'

:

£*\.

'•

MCNAMARAS WISH TO KEEP DISCUSSION CONFINED TO PRACTICAL AN&amp;^.TEClftic'A!?|H,*
PROBLEMS INVOLVED AND TO AVOID GETTING INTO POLITICAL PRO SEEKS WHlCHtlV*
WERE BASICALLY THE RESPONSIBILITY OF NATO FOREIGN MINISTERS* HE
\
y\J&gt;/
•
THOUGHT THAT IF THE MILITARY AUTHORITIES PREPARED FAIRLY FULL'
REPORTS ON EXISTING ARRANGEKETS THEY WOULD PROBABLY TOUCH^G«.V

-

' . p * • •&gt;
' • • '•*#
/ ;&amp;,fcf
\

a

SOME OF THE PROBLEMS WHICH WE RAISED IN OUR MEMO OF MAY12«HE * .- '
•

.

ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THESE WERE VERY BASIC QUESTIONS BUT THOUGHT '."

•

' '—*
*,

-

v

p

000122

�*

®EST ORIGINAL AVAILABLE
P AG * J&gt; v ' • * &lt; S i
r i H l i £ U E i ORIGINAL

THtolQhtlL

Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur I'acces a I'information

REPORTS WERE PREPARED ON EXISTING ARRANGEMENTS IT WOULD

^WREMATURE

TO SPECULATE ON HOW DISCUSSION MIGHT DEVELOP. ASKED

WHETHER MCNAMARA MAY TRY TO OUTLINE TO DEFENCE MINISTERS USA VIEWS
ON CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH NUCLEAR WEAPONS MIGHT HE USED SPIERS
SAID THIS WAS A POSSIBILIT Y BUT KORE LIKELY WOULD EMERGE. IN THE
COURSE OF DISCUSSION RATHER THAN AS RESULT OF PREDETERMINED PLAN
ON THE PART OF THE SECRETARY. HE AGREED. THAT THIRD TASK USA HAD IN
MIND WOULD INVOLVE EXCHANGE CF INTELLIGENCE AND I F SUCH AN EXCHANGE
WERE DESIRED I T WOULD PROBABLY REQUIRE GREATLY IMPROVED COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS. FIRST STEP HOWEVER If.' USA VIEW WOULD BE TO SUPPLY
MEMBERS WITH ACCURATE INFO ON CURRENT STATE OF COKKUNIC ATIONS. S P I ERS
ENVISAGED THIRD TASK AS COMPRISING

.EXAM OF THE KINDS OF INFO THAT

WOULD BE REQUIRED IN NATO CAPITALS SC THAT ALL GOVTS DIRECTLY
CONCERNED WOULD HAVE AVAILABLE SA*-'E INFO ON WHICH TO BASE THEIR
DECISIONS.
5 . CONSISTENT WITH USA IDEA THAT CTTEE WOULD CONCENTRATE ON PRACTICAL PROBLEMS SPIERS SAID USA WOULD SEE ONE DAY MINISTERIAL MTG.
PROBABLY FOLLOWED BY EXPERT WORKING GROUPS WHICH WOULD BE CHARGED
BY MINISTERS WITH PREPARATION OF FURTHER REPORTS FOR - CONSIDERATI CN
AT LATER DEFENCE MINISTER-MTG* ACCORDING TO S P I E R S , MCNAMARA EXPECTED
THERE WOULD BE SUFFICIENT WORK BEFORE CTTEE TO JUSTIFY ITS REMAINING
IN EXISTENCE UNTIL END OF 1 9 6 6 . PROBABLY A NUMBER OF OTHER SESSIONS
OF CTTEE DURING 1 9 6 6

WOULD BE REQUIRED BEFORE I T WOULD BE IN

POSITION TO SUBMIT ANY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DECISIONS BY GOVTS* USA
CONTINUED TO REGARD CTTEE AS PURELY ADVISORY IN CHARACTER WITH
... 4
:-./
"
*
•
•
«'
:», i *:« *••*•

�Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur I'acces a /'information

QgOT m®m
WWUBLE
IWEILLEUR ORIGINAL

PAGE FOUR 3 3 9 1
RESPONSIBILITY TO REPORT ITS FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO NATO
COUNCIL*
6 . ON POSSIBILITY THAT DEFENCE MINISTERS MIGHT FIND SUBJECT MATTER
SOMEWHAT TOO TECHNICAL .AND MIGHT TURN TC BROADER ISSUES AFFECTING
FUTURE OF ALLIANCE SPIERS SAID THEY DID NOT RPT NOT HAVE WORRIEft ON
THAT SCORE. CERTAINLY MCNAMARA WISHED TO AVOID POLITICAL ISSUES AS
SUBJECTS OFMORE DIRECT CONCERN" TO FOREIGN MINISTERS AND WOULD

•i •

MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO CONCENTRATE DISCUSSION ON IMPORTANT PRACTICAL
PROBLEMS RELATING TO USE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS WHICH HERETOFORE-HAVE
NEVER REALLY BEEN DEALT WITH. FACT THAT MTG WOULD ONLY LAST ONE DAY
SHOULD ALSO FACILITATE CONCENTRATION OF DISCUSSION ON AREAS PRIMA*
RILY OF RESPONSIBILITY OF DEFENCE MINISTERS.

^••^•yT'y

.i a.

+ •»«

"—*wp^, V ^ *
r

Pt-„ *, &gt; i &gt;

A-

••/

•

• ••'

l

^fet*, "^

•--&gt;• V ' S ^ V* 1*000124 •

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="43">
          <name>Identifier</name>
          <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2034602">
              <text>CDNW18193</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="48">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2034605">
              <text>"Defence - Conventional and Nuclear Armaments - Nuclear Weapons Policy,” RG25-A-3-c, File number: 27-11-1, File part: 2, Library and Archives Canada (LAC)</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="39">
          <name>Creator</name>
          <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2034608">
              <text>LAC ATIP A-2017-00249</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2034611">
              <text>Crown Copyright</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="45">
          <name>Publisher</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2034614">
              <text>Canada Declassified</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2034617">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="42">
          <name>Format</name>
          <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2034620">
              <text>PDF</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="44">
          <name>Language</name>
          <description>A language of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2034623">
              <text>ENG</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
