https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/cf1adcec49a5f41c543223bea38b9710.pdf c416ebae662d068baacfcdc8b374f540 PDF Text Text D o c u n ^ ^ ^ A t j g ^ ^ h e W c W i T ) Infixjrwtion ActDocumeffnlMlgire en veijMde la Loi sur raccefalUnfofmation J i FPIASHDC •• AUG 1 2 / 6 5 SECRET . TO EXTERNAL 2 5 6 2 IMMED cL 1 J: * 7 - J l z L l —^——p- i ^ ' INFO NATOPARIS EMBPARIS LDN PERMISNY BONN BRU HAGUE GENEVA TT CANFORCEHED CDS DE OTT 1**3.?./(*& ' - i £ FINANCE DE OTT REF NATOPARIS TEL 1663 AUG 11 MCNAMARAS PROPOSALS AND MEMBERSHIP SELECT CTTEE LEDDY.ASSTSEC FOR EUROPEAN AFFAIRS,RAISED WITH ME THIS MORNING QUESTS y . .< OF CDN PARTICIPATION IN SELECT CTTEE.HE MENTIONED. THAT TURKISH GOVT SEEMED TO BE INSISTENT ON PARTICIPATING IN CTTEE IF IT WERE TO COMRPISE 7 MEMBERS INCLUDING FRANCE .IN, CIRCUMSTANCES, INCLUSION OF TURKEY WOULD NOT RPT NOT ONLY INCREASE TOTAL MEMBERSHIP TO 8 BUT UNDOUBTEDLY WOULD LEAD TO REQUEST FOR PARTICIPATION FROM GREECE. RESULT COULD HARDLY BE REGARDED A S'SELECT CTTEE AND PROBABLY WOULD NOT RPT NOT SERVE ORIGINAL PURPOSE MCNAMARA HAD IN MIND. 2.LEDDY THEN MENTIONED MEMO WHICH STATE DEPT RECEIVED FROM US LAST ' MAY,CONCERNING ARRANGEMENTS FOR CONTROL OF, NUCLEAR WEAPONS TO BE EMPLOYED BY CDN FORCES IN EUROPE (SEE OURTEL 1514 MAY12).HE WONDERED WHETHER WE MIGHT BE PREPARED TO STAND DOWN FROM MEMBERSHIP IN SELECT CTTEE F IT WERE UNDERSTOOD THAT THERE WOULD BE A GREATER AMOUNT OF BILATERAL CONSULTATION ON THESE QUESTIONS,MANY OF WHICH WERE RAISED IN OUR MEMO.I SAID THAT I COULD NOT RPT NOT RECALL CLEARLY THE PRECISE TERMS OF THE MEMO IN QUESTION BUT IT WAS MY IMPRESSION THAT IT HAD BEEN DRAFTED WITH A VIEW TO CLEARING UP SOME OF THE PROBLEMS WHICH SPECIFICALLY RELATED TO CDN FORCES IN EUROPE.I SAID I WAS NOT RPT NOT IN A POSH ION TO COMMENT ON HIS SUGGESTION BUT UNDERTOOK TO FORWARD IT TO YOU.LEDDY SAID THAT. IDEA APPEALED,TO MCNAMARA Ai0Bo038 THAT LATTER WOULD BE HAVING DISCUSSION TODAY WITH RUSK. �Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act PAGE TWO 2 5 6 2 ' Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur I'acces a I'information • ' * . 3 . U ^ CONVERSATION AND INFO IN NATOPARIS REFTEL INDICATE CLEARLY THAT AMERICANS ARE CASTING ABOUT FOR POSSIBLE, WAYS OF RESOLVING ". CURRENT DEADLOCK .AS WE SEE IT THERE UNDOUBTEDLY WILL'HAVE TO BE ••*'' SOME BILATERAL TALKS WITH THEM ON ARRANGEMENTS RELATING TO OUR ' FORCES IN EUROPE.I WOULD PERSONALLY DOUBT,HOWEVER,THAT IT WOULD BE IN OUR INTEREST TO ACCEPT IDEA OF* MORE FREQUENT BILATERAL DISCUSSIONS WHICH MAY PROVE TO BE MAINLY TECHNICAL iAS SUBSTITUTE FOR MEMBERSHIP IN CTTEE WHICH MAY WELL HAVE IMPORTANT POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS IN RESPECT OF FUTURE ORGANIZATION OF ALLIANCE « RITCHIE * 000041 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context CDNW18153 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived "Defence - Conventional and Nuclear Armaments - Nuclear Weapons Policy,” RG25-A-3-c, File number: 27-11-1, File part: 2, Library and Archives Canada (LAC) Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource LAC ATIP A-2017-00249 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Crown Copyright Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Canada Declassified Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource PDF Language A language of the resource ENG