<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="192436" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/items/show/192436?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-04-20T03:06:55-04:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="176488">
      <src>https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/9d1281ff3db2cc9355052f08b35b06f0.pdf</src>
      <authentication>b1e7c017d2a4998325095db19a829223</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="31">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="131">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="1829296">
                  <text>~'^*
^

'
.-

j-

Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur I'acces a /'information

-m*,'

-0

'•-Xt
•f e:&gt;1 •.-:'.' i,* ~. T'.* \ P|

VA Ay;
r. . . y &lt;v-- P y?:x:
y:
•• rn-'y''-FM WASHDC MAR31/60 SECRET

• V,
A-

J

'^,x7

(.yyy

--y-

xx...

rv 'xrV'. 2Q" A. •;:• :•;;&gt; f- .v. X T O " ! t ^ j j : : j * x.x.

fjj;;or

.X'

A

v.: cxyy

..

^.A'Xi
f

&gt;A i

TO EXTERNAL 868 OPIMMED
A A . . 77fiA; iXCxr- - J Y ^ O T.'iV.T ZPT' TX 3 A T i T t A ' t j T'lATr^r .TiAA
INFO CCOS OTT FM OTT
*•'.: '•'•••'•* A:y-Xr.ioij7).\ :A: OA^r-x.xwx.si 1*373 ii.'.:t :'rr;;7£ T I T no v 0•.:••. *• 2
REF YOURTELS DL337 AND DL338 MAR25
*"'J STORAGE'OF AIR TO* AIR NUCLEAR' WEAPONS AT GOOSE* %kVAND' HARMON""
t77 " " e s 'ftn T A V 7 n o n / e - ' 4 r n i v.\sx\ -.v, V/&gt;.JIT (P'«P- r *''i *-;~* R":vh^i»r.-n
ACCOMPANIED BY AIR VICE MARSHAL HENDRICK AND NUTT 1CALLED' "OM""
KOHLERC ASST' SECRETARY''EU^&amp;PEJfJX, AFl ^IRS)THi§i A?tERN6&amp;l°ANDJPASSED
OVER TO HIM THE REVISED ANNEX TO THE DRAFT NOYiAdN THIS^SUBUECT AND
"ALSO A QUOTE PIECE OF PAPER UNQUOTE^BASED ON THE"COMMENTS'SETJOUT
IN PARA3 OF Y0URTEi:,DL337,'(COPY""OF1 THIS QUOTE'PIECE OFuPAPERJUNQUOTE
"WILL' GO'fORWARD•lTO°YOU BY TQMORRbW'BAG!;)W?LLOUGHiY;CDIRECT6Vi''0?FICE
'OF 'COMMONWEALTH1'1 AND^VoRTHERN VuROPEAN 0 AFFAIRsTkNO BURGESS&lt;'CDN'" DESK&gt;
~WERE ALSO PRESENT.'

•*'.

- ^'~*~

'"""'•

w K

U

'

, J }

! J

' *M

lLU?

• - " 2 ; I' C © M E N C E ^ ^ T o t N * h W OUT; THAT THE*^REDR'AFT' OF*'THET ANNEX''C ONTAINED
A CONSIDERABLE ^UMBER QF"CHANGE2 OVER BOTH T H E ' P R E V T O U W D N ' D R A F T
' &gt; '.•" *

".'("' '.''*•

"i'l'Y I

»f' ,* VlO -f .— ' •• —

, V I",

.1,1 ,- — - -1*.*f. • :,ef .,, • -»

1
ANDUSA REDRAFT;:i* STRESSED'THAT CDN 'GOVT fa AD'MADE
THE: CHANGES %. H S
J
ORIGINAL PROPOSALS" IN AN'ATTEMPT TO MEET THE 'RIGIDITIES*WITH WHICH

USA V A S ' CONFRONTED' AND'THUS1 f O^FACIl/lTATE ' A W E W E N T /

Ei

^ .VJ'iTj;?

3* AFTER READING lOVER THE1'ANNEX 'AND'QUOTE'PIECE OF PAPER'UNQUOTE
" KOHLER SAID* THAT'At h^T^GLANCE^HE' 'TRFuflkT^-TOAT' OUR FuWESTIONS
'CAME'CLOSER -'TO lEETING 1 T H ^ ' D i m c ' l f L T x Y s V o s W BYT USA:'ilAW: AND ;BY
OPERATIONAL 'REQWREMENTsI'HE'sAiD^tH^
L!:

STUDY''THE ^VfsYD^ANNEX^&amp;'D'-'buR-WoiY^

OF' PAPER-UNQUOTE" BUT

THAT IN THE -MEANTIME1 HE 'HAD" ONE^"0R» TWO-PRELIMINARY atfQUIRIES/AS YOU
ANTIC IP ATED, HE COMMENTED' ON &gt;THE70MISSION;iQF ttHE iWORDi'QUOTE CUSTODY
UNQUOTE. I .INDICATED.-CDN DESIRE TO AV0ID-THE--W0RD; AND; EXPLAINED THAT
IT SEEMED TO US THAT THE QUESTION OF.-CUSTODY WAS NOT RPT NOT
RAISED IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE STORAGE SITES WOULD BE LOCATED
ON TERRIROTY LEASED 3Y USA„ AS LESSEE USA WOULD BE IN FULL POSSESSION
OF WEAPONS STORED ON THE BASES,

'

2
001105

�Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en v e f t u d e la Lpi sur I'acfes a I'information

v•

PAGE TWO 8 6 8
4oK0HLER NEXT ASKED WHAT WOULD BE THE ROLE OF CDN REPS WHICH UNDER
PARA3 OF THE ANNEX WOULD BE STATIONED AT USA BASES.I SAID THAT AS
I UNDERSTOOD IT THEIR FUNCTION WOULD BE TO BE IN A POSITION TO
QUOTE CERTIFY UNQUOTE AS IT WERE THAT OBLIGATIONS UNDER PARAS4
5 6 AND 7 OF THE ANNEX HAD BEEN DISCHARGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CDN
REQUlREMENTSoKOHLER SAID HE THOUGHT THERE WOULD BE NO RPT NO PROBLEM
REGARDING REPS AND SAID THAT HE FULLY UNDERSTOOD THAT CDN GOVT MUST
BE ABLE TO CERTIFY THAT ITS REQUIREMENTS HAD BEEN MET.
5,WILLOUGHBY A r ^

WHETHER IN SUM OF NEW DRAFT ANNEX REQUIRED

ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES FOR OBTAINING APPROVAL OF CDN GOVT OVER AND
ABOVE THOSE ALREADY IN EXISTENCE*IN PARTICULAR HE REFERRED TO
PROCEDURES CONCERNING TRANSPORT OF WEAPONS FOR LOGISTICAL PURPOSES.
WE CALLED HIS ATTENTION TO PARA E OF THE QUOTE PIECE OF PAPER UNQUOTE WHICH CONTAINED COMMENTS REGARDING PARA5 OF THE DRAFT ANNEX
POINTING OUT THAT THE PROCEDURES ENVISAGES- SERE THOSE PRESCRIBED^
UNDER SCHEDULE QUOTE B UNQUOTE TO ORDER IN COUNCIL PC2307 AND ANY
'1HICH MIGHT BE ADOPTED BY CDN AUTHORITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE ATOMIC ENERGY CONTROL BOARD AND OF THE SAFETY
STANDARDS REFERRED TO IN PARA4 OF THE DRAFT ANNEX.REGARDING THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE ATOMIC ENERGY CONTROL BOARD KOHLER EXPRESSED
SOME CONCERN WHETHER THIS COULD RESULT IN UNILATERAL ACTION BY CDA
WHICH COULD HAVE THE AFFECT OF PREJUDICING THE STORAGE PROGRAMME.
I POINTED OUT THAT ANY REGULATIONS WOULD HAVE TO BE APPROVED BY
CDN GOVT AND THAT I ASSUMED THAT WHEREVER PROSPECTIVE REGULATIONS
MIGHT APPEAR TO AFFECT ANY AGREEMENT ON STORAGE THERE WOULD BE
PRIOR NOTICE TO AKD CONSULTATION WITH USA*
6»XN CONCLUSION I EXPRESSED THE HOPE THAT IN THEIR FUTURE STUDY OF
OUR REDRAFT USA AUTHORITIES WOULD BEAR IN MIND THE EFFORT WHICH THE
CDtf GOVT HAD HADE TO REACH A MUTUALLY ACCEPTABLE TEXT.I STRESSED
THAT QUESTIONS CONCERNING NUCLEAR WEAPONS ARE REGARDED BY CDN GOVT
o ©»O

001106

�Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur I'acces a I'information

t

PAGE THREE 8 6 8
AS MATTERS OF HIGH POLICY AND INDICATED THAT CERTAIN PRINCIPLES
WERE INVOLVED TO WHICH CDN GOVT ATTACHED THE HIGHEST IMPORTANCE.
I THEREFORE HOPED THAT USA GOVT MIGHT SEE ITS WAY CLEAR TO ACCEPTING
CDN REDRAFT WITH AS FEW COUNTER SUGGESTIONS AS POSSIBLE
HEENEY

001107

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="43">
          <name>Identifier</name>
          <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1829299">
              <text>CDNW16603</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1829302">
              <text>CDNW16603</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="48">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1829305">
              <text>"Continental defence - Atomic capability," RG25-A-3-b, vol 5930, file 50210-F-40, part 5.1, Library and Archives Canada (LAC).</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
