https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/cfa0dba50433c9ae1f7247e007d417c4.pdf d4c9ebd142ea1c755c4f392b382502ad PDF Text Text SECRET Q U O T E NO, ^ MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF T H E JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL TO- CSC 2108:l-AC/228 Vol. 1 (JAG/Gl) 28 Apr 6k Executive Secretary of the Joint Special Weapons Policy Committee Revised Draft Agreement on Co-operation Regarding Atomic Information 1. Reference telephone conversation S/L Dixie - Major Wolfe 27 Apr 6k. 2. I have reviewed External Affairs' messages 802 and 803 dated 2k Apr 6U together with HATO Working Paper AC/228-WP/l. I have no comments to make on these documents and the remarks below are made as general observations. 3. The reference to "French version para 5" at line 8 of the text of message 803 is not understood as Article IV para $ of AC/228-WP/1 does not contain a French version. In addition, there appears to be a typographical error in that Articles III and IV are both to be renumbered Article V. This would leave the text without an Article IV. Presumably it was intended that Article III be renumbered Article IV. U. Reference is made in message 803 to "new versions" of certain paragraphs; i.e., Section X of the Security Annex, but the texts of the new versions are not included. The compromise effected between the US and France would appear to indicate that the new versions referred to will be along the lines of the present French version contained in WP/l. $, The effect of what will now be Article II (present Article VIII) is to make the Agreement one whereby the US provides information on the terms specified in the Agreement. If other members intend to supply information a new agreement similar to the present one will be required. By virtue of Article VIII (present Article VII) the present Canada-US bilateral Agreement is unaffected and no change to procedures now in effect will be required. 6. The French approach to the powers of the Secretary-General in the field of security would appear preferable to what was originally proposed. Originally it was intended that the Secretary-General could direct corrective action where deficiencies were apparent. The French version only permits him to bring deficiencies to the attention of national authorities. 7. The British concern that information received under the 19$$ Agreement should continue to be treated under the terms of that Agreement has not been resolved, but this does not appear to be of concern to Canada. 8. I would suggest that Article VI, dealing with patents, be referred to AIM/R (Patents Section) for review. (p. P. Wdlfe) for Judge Advocate General JPW/2-2201/cg -_ [000259 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context CDNW04956 Title A name given to the resource JAG to JSWPC Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 28-Apr-64 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived NATO Agreement for Cooperation Regarding Atomic Information, RG24-B-1, vol. 21471, CSC 2108-1-AC-228, Library and Archives Canada (LAC). Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Department of National Defence Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Canadian Crown Subject The topic of the resource NATO, nuclear weapons Description An account of the resource Revised Draft Agreement on Co-operation Regarding Atomic Information Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Canada Declassified Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource PDF Language A language of the resource en