https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/1b0c146d87c449935de0bcfc463fc3e4.pdf 65753b3b76847ecf417982cf903bf8a2 PDF Text Text CFPDFT OLv/l\Ll AP Paraphrase n w not required. No unclassified reply or reference, -CSC/dS This message was referred to the it A FM NATOPARIS APR24/<§^ SECRET ^ ^ • • " " ^ -ST"Copy fetained by the Dilf^S QBrnZikj*/$£rl~4y3*% TO EXTERNAL S02 PRIORITY „ „ _ b. Requested to hold till &J/$t^ZL" TZ INFO CCOS PRIORITY . / DDInDfFV* 2}*T-/*/t£/S2£ ^^Other Instr. *"" NllUm I1 REF OURLET NU24 N0V§/<S3 ^ PRIORITY DRAFT AGREEMENT ©N ATOMIC INFO sjy^ WE DRAW YOUR ATTENTION TQ AC/228-A/3 AGENDA FOR NEXT MTG OF WORKING GROUP MAY^sAND TO AC/228-WP/2 REVISED TOT' OF AGREEMENT WHICH WILL FORM BASIS OF DISCUSSIONo 2QTHREE POINTS OF SUBSTANTIAL DISAGREEMENT SET OUT XN REFLET NOW SEEM CLOSE TO BEING RESOLVED*AFTER PRIVATE TALKSpUSA AND FRENCH AUTHORITIES HAVE REACHED AGREEMENT ON TOO POINTS SEPARATING THEMoIN EFFECT AMERICANS HAVE GIVEN IN TO FRENCH ON POWERS OF SECGEN WHILE FRENCH HAVE GIVEN IN TO AMERICANS ON MULTILATERAL FORM OF AGREEMENToTHIS FRANCO-USA UNDERSTANDING HAS PERMITTED CIRCULATION OF NEW DRAFT OF AGREEMENT IN AC/22S-VP/2.VE ARE SENDING LIST OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN AC/228?VF/1 AND WP/2 . SEPARATELYoAS TO THIRD POINT OF DISAGREEMENT BETWEEN BRIT AND USA OVER SECURITY REGULATIONS NO RPT NO FINAL AGREEMENT HAS YET BEEN REACHED EUT USA DO NOT RPT NOT EXPECT FURTHER DIFFICULTY ON THIS POINTo 3oAS TO PARTICULAR POINTS OF CDN INTEREST'S USA DEL TELL US THEY CANNOT RPT NOT ACCEPT OUR SUGGESTIONS ABOUT ART I AND III FOR REASON GIVEN IN PARAIS OF REFLEToHOWEVER THEY WILL ACCEPT OUR PROPOSED ARTICLE ON RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRESENT AGREEMENT AND BILATERAL AGREEMENTS WHICH APPEAR AS ART VII IN AC/22S-WP/I AND ii SECRET 000263 �CCPDFT OLVsixL. I W 0^., A P Paraphrase H U not required. No unclassified reply or reference, PAGE TWO 802 AS .VIIIAIN WP/2 fcoltSA DEL ARE CONERNED OVER TIMETABLE*,AGREEMENT MUST LIE BEFORE JOINT CONGRESSIONAL CTTEE FOR SIXTY DAYS.SINCE CONGRESS WILL PRESUMABLY RECESS BEFORE CONVENTIONS THIS SUMMER AGREEMENT TO A DRAFT' WILL EITHER HAVE TO BE REACHED VERYP'SUICKLY' OR ELSE POSTPONEMENT UNTIL SOME TIME NEXT WINTERPSEEMS INEVITABLEo USA DEL MW NOT RPT NOT SURE WHETHER IT WILL BE LEGALLY SUFFXCIE FOR NATO COUNCIL TO HAVE INDICATED ITS APPROVAL OF DRAFT WITHOUT SIGNATURE CEREMONY NECESSARILY HAVING TAKEN PLACE BEFORE TEXT IS PRESENTED TO CONGRESSoIF COUNCIL APPROVAL ONLY IS REQUIREDTTHERE MAY BE USA PRESSURE TO OBTAIN THIS WITHIN NEXT TWO WEEKS?IF IT IS LEGALLY NECESSARY FOR AGREEMENT TO HAVE BEEN SIGNED BEFORE PRESENTATION TO CONGRESS?HOWEVER IT SEEMS IMPOSSIBLE TO COMPLETE NECESSARY FORMALITIES BEFORE CONGRESS'RECESSES. 50MAY WE HAVE' INSTRUCTIONS BY MAY4o 2460 APR 64 SECRET 000264 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context CDNW04953 Title A name given to the resource NATOParis to External 802 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 24-Apr-64 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived NATO Agreement for Cooperation Regarding Atomic Information, RG24-B-1, vol. 21471, CSC 2108-1-AC-228, Library and Archives Canada (LAC). Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Department of National Defence Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Canadian Crown Subject The topic of the resource NATO, nuclear weapons Description An account of the resource Draft Agreement on Atomic Info Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Canada Declassified Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource PDF Language A language of the resource en