<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="124650" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/items/show/124650?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-09-12T00:21:15-04:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="113595">
      <src>https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/70fc710b6b9540843d4923df872cf5d0.pdf</src>
      <authentication>58b38a674ca6afc9ec9f64488b7f3bd7</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="31">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="131">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="1195668">
                  <text>BY 3E CWIi^MEANSl

SECRET

Signal Centre
Chairman,
Chiefs of Staff
Phone 9-2-4835
Room 4802A Bldfd

CSC.MS

2/oZ.J„
FM NATOPARIS APR 1/60 SECRET

iA°'

TO EXTERNAL 96L_0PIMMED
INFO CCOS TJASTWr BONN LDN CJS&lt;L&gt; EMBPARIS OPIMMED
TT DND OPIMMED FM CCOS

(s

*;.M

t'l -ooR^Iff

DDP OPIMMED FM OTT
DEFENCE MINISTERS MEETING-USA PROPOSALS REGARDING MRBMS FOR EURoPl^
AT THIS MORNINGS MEETING OF MINISTERS MR GATES MADE THE USA OFFER
DEALT WITH IN UASHDCS TELS13 MAR26.THE TERMINOLOGY NOW TO BE USED
IS MEDIUM RANGE BALLISTIC MISSILES(MRBMS).FOR CONVENIENCE OF REF
WE MIGHT REPEAT THE TERMS OF THE ALTERNATIVE PROPOSALS,
2.THE FIRST ALTERNATIVE WHICH GATES INDICATED WAS MUCH PREFERABLE
TO THE USA WAS THE SALE OF POLARIS MISSILES TO EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
WITH EUROPEAN PRODUCTION OF THE LAUNCHING EQUIPMENT.THE NUCLEAR
WARHEADS WOULD BE PROVIDED BY THE USA AND THE USA WOULD BE WILLING
TO PROVIDE SOME MDAP FUNDS FOR THE PROGRAMME,THE CONDITIONS IMPOSED
UPON TIE PROVISION OF THESE MISSILES WOULD BE&lt;A)THAT THE PROGRAMME
BE APPROVED BY NATO COUNCIL|(B)THAT THE MISSILES BE UNDER SACEURS
CONTROLS3(C)THAT THERE BE ADVANCE COMMITMENT TO ACCEPT STORAGE OF
THE NUCLEAR COMPONENTS ANDCD)THAT THERE BE ADVANCE COMMITMENT TO
DEPLOY THE MISSILES TO MEET SACEURS REQUIREMENTS.THE ALTERNATIVE
PROPOSAL UAS THAT THE USA UOULD PROVIDE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR
THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A MULTILATERAL PRODUCTION CAPABILITY IN
EUROPE FOR TIE MISSILE.A SMALL QUANTITY OF MISSILES MANUFACTURED
IN THE USA WOULD BE PROVIDED TO FILL TIE T H E GAP WHICH UOULD

\

SECRET

000960

�BY SECUIMvMEANSj

SFHRFT

S i g n a l Centre
Chairman,
Chiefs of Staff

ouurvui

phone

9_2_4835

Room 4802A Bldgj
Do* SECRET PAGE TWO

RESULT FROM THE NECESSITY OF SETTING UP SEPARATE PRODUCTION FACILITIES IN EUROPE.THE SECOND PROPOSAL WAS SUBJECT TO. THE SAME
CONDITIONS AS THE FIRST.
3,THE FRENCH MINISTER SAID THAT TIE USA PROPOSALS WOULD REQUIRE A
GOOD DEAL OF STUDY.WHEN THE FRENCH GOVT HAD GIVEN ITS APPROVAL IN
PRINCIPLE TO TIE EQUIPMENT OF NATO FORCES WITH MRBMS THEY HAD NOT
RPT MOT TuOUuiT THAT'THEY SHOULD BE PROVIDED EXCLUSIVELY FOR
3ACEUR.IT WOULD BE NECESSARY BECASUE OF TIE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE
FRENCH GOVT THAT ITS FORCES SHOULD BE EQUIPPED WITH SUCH MISSILES,
IT WOULD BE NECESSARY THEREFORE TO FIND A BASIS OF CO-OPERATION
UNDER DIFFERING CONDITIONS THAN THOSE PUT FORWARD BY MR GATES,
HE REFERRED TO THE STUDY CONCERNING THE MANUFACTURE IN EUROPE OF A
SECOND GENERATION MRBM WHICH HAD BEEN MADE BY A COMMITTEE HEADED
BY THE ASST SECGEN FOR PRODUCTION AND LOGISTICS AS BEING A MORE
CONSTRUCTIVE APPROACH TO TIE PROBLEM IN TIE FRENCH VIEW THAN THAT
WHICH HAD JUST BEEN SUGGESTED BY THE USA.HE EMPHASIZED THAT HIS
STATEMENT SHOULD NOT RPT NOT BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION THAT THE
FRENCH GOVT WOULD REFUSE TO CO-OPERATE IN THIS PROGRAMME BUT IT
WOULD CERTAINLY WISH TO GIVE TIE PROPOSALS A GOOD DEAL MORE THOUGHT
BEFORE ANY DECISION WAS POSSIBLE.
4.MR STRAUSS OF GERMANY SAID HE THOUGHT TIE PROPOSALS SHOULD BE
STUDIED CAREFULLY BY TIE PERM COUNCILS NUMBER OF QUESTIONS OCCURRED

SECRET

000961

�BY SaCUJft^MEANSJ

SECRET

Signal Centre
Chairman,
Chiefs of Staff
Phone 9-2-4835
Room 4802A Bldgj

SSI SECRET PAGE THREE

TO HIM AS TYPICAL OF THE DETAILED QUESTIONS WHICH WOULD HAVE TO
BE EXAMINED BEFORE ANY DECISIONS COULD BE TAKEN,WOULD THE MISSILES
BE PURCHASED BY INDIVIDUAL STATE37WAS THE POLARIS TRULY A
MOBILE WEAPONS SYSTEM?WAS PURCHASE OF THE WEAPONS FROM THE USA
REALLY TIE BEST SOLUTION?
5.MR PEARKES SAID THAT THE USA PROPOSALS WOULD INVOLVE SOME FAR
REACHING PROBLEMS AFFECTING A NUMBER OF MEMBERS OF TIE ALLIANCE,
HE SAID i!E UOULD HAVE PREFERRED IF TIE PROPOSAL COULD HAVE BEEN '
SUBMITTED IN WRITING PRIOR TO THE MEETING SO THAT .AN OPPORTUNITY
MIGHT HAVE BEEN AFFORDED FOR ITS DISCUSSION WITH OTHER MINISTERS
OP TIE GOVT WHO UOULD BE CONCERNED,IE SUPPORTED THE SUGGESTION THAT
THE PROPOSALS BE EXAMINED THOROUGHLY BY THE COUNCIL,IE THOUGHT,
HOWEVER-THAT THE MILITARY IMPLICATIONS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FIRS';'
BY THE MILITARY COMMITTEEMAN THE INTERIM AS LITTLE PUBLICITY AS
POSSIBLE SHOULD BE GIVEN TO THE PROPOSALS,,PUBLIC SPECULATION ABOUT
THE SITING OF LARGE NUMBERS OF MRBMS IN EUROPE WAS BOUND TO HAVE AN
EFFECT 01] THE NEGOTIATIONS PRESENTLY GOING FORWARD IN GENEVA ON
DISARMAMENT.IT WAS ESSENTIAL TO AVOID DISRUPTING THOSE NEGOTIATIONS
AT THIS TIME.
6.MR WATKINSON OF THE UK AGREED THAT TIE PROPOSALS SHOULD BE
EXAMINED XN TIE PERM COUNCIL AND THAT EVERY EFFORT SHOULD BE MADE
TO AVOID SPECULATION IN THE PRESS ON TIE SUBJECT.HIS PRELIMINARY

SECRET

000962

�BY SEOUIL^MEANSi

SECRET

Signal Centre
Chairman,
Chiefs of Staff
Phone 9-2-4835
Room 4802A Bldg

961 SECRET PACE FOUR

VIEW WAS THAT THE PURCHASE OF THE MISSILES WOULD BE THE MOST
EXPEDITIOUS AND ECONOMICAL SOLUTION TO MEETING TIE REQUIREMENT FOR
MISSILES WHICH IE UNDERSTOOD HAD ALREADY BEEN ESTABLISHED BY THE
fciUTARY COMMITTEE.HE SAID HIS GOVT WOULD GIVE THE USA PROPOSALS
THE URGENT STUDY WHICH THEY DESERVED.A NUMBER OF OTHER EUROPEAN
REPS URGED THAT THE POSSIBILITY OF COMMON EUROPEAN PRODUCTION
SHOULD NOT RPT NOT BE EXCLUDED.THERE WAS GENERAL SUPPORT FOR TIE
IDEA THAT THE PROPOSALS SHOULD BE STUDIED BY THE MILITARY AUTHORITIES
AMD TIE COUNCIL.
7,SPAAK TERMED THE USA PROPOSALS AS TIE MOST IMPORTANT COMMUNICATION ON THE QUESTION OF NATO NUCLEAR WEAPONS SINCE THE HEADS OF GOVT
MEETING IN 1957,IE URGED THEREFORE THAT EVERY EFFORT BE MADE TO
PREVENT MISLEADING PUBLICITY CONCERNING TIE OFFER,LATER ON IN THE
HORNING5UHEN TIE COMMUNIQUE WAS BEING CONSIDERED,THE MATTER OF
PUBLICITY WAS AGAIN DISCUSSED,WITH A NUMBER OF REPS SEEING MO RPT
MO REASON WHY REF TO TIE USA PROPOSAL SHOULD NOT RPT MOT BE MADE
IN THE COMMUNIQUE.MR PEARKES SUPPORTED TIE SECGENS ARGUMENT
THAT NO RPT MO DIRECT REF SHOULD BE MADE IN TIE COMMUNIQUE TO THE
SUBJECT,THERE WAS GENERAL PESSIMISM,HOWEVER,THAT THE FACT THAT TIE
PROPOSAL HAD BEEN MADE COULD BE KEPT FROM TIE NEWSPAPERS*FINALLY?IT
WAS AGREED THAT TIE LAST SENTENCE OF TIE COMMUNIQUE SHOULD READ
QUOTE TIE PRESENT STATUS OF EQUIPMENT IN MODERN WEAPONS WAS ALSO
EXAMINED UNQUOTE,

0096/0097/009S/CK/02 APR 60

SECRET

000963

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="43">
          <name>Identifier</name>
          <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1195641">
              <text>CDNW04198</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1195644">
              <text>CDNW04198</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="48">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1195647">
              <text>"NATO Cooperation Regarding Nuclear Weapons And Missile Bases (IRBM)," RG24-B-1, vol 21468, file CSC 2108:1, part 3, Library and Archives Canada (LAC). </text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1195650">
              <text>Canadian Crown</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1195653">
              <text>Nuclear Weapons</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="45">
          <name>Publisher</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1195656">
              <text>Canada Declassified</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1195659">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="42">
          <name>Format</name>
          <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1195662">
              <text>PDF</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="44">
          <name>Language</name>
          <description>A language of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1195665">
              <text>en</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
