https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/5cbb5923497f9c08272cdf81058d54f0.pdf ac64a64d29dd3993a13185d511adf0d3 PDF Text Text 'cOlJ&^k?... OB' 12 Fi AShDC*DEC 12/57 TOPSEC CDN EYES ONLY TO-EXTERNAL 2630 OPIMMEDIATE REF OUR TEL 2626 DEC 12 USA PROPOSALS RE CLOSER INTEGRATION OF ATOMIC CAPABILITIES IN DEFENCE OF NORTHAMERICA AS THE STATE DEPT HAD INFORMALLY INDICATED IN ADVANCE TO US, MR JOHN JONESsACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EUROPEAN AFFAIRS, CALLED ME TO THE DEPT TODAY FOR THE PURPOSE OF OUTLINING USA PROPOSALS FOR THE CLOSER INTEGRATION OF ATOMIC CAPABILITIES IN DEFENCE OF NORTHAMERICA.GENERAL LOPER,CHAIRMAN OF THE MILITARY COMMITTEE TO THE ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION,WAS PRESENT,AS WERE REPS OF THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL ASSISTANT FOR ATOMIC ENERGY MATTERS IN THE STATE DEPT,AND OFFICIALS FROM THE CANADIAN DESKo JONES EXPLAINED THAT HE WAS RECEIVING ME IN THE ABSENCE OF BURKE ELBRICK,WHO HAS LEFT FOR THE NATO MEETINGS.HE BEGAN BY REFERRING TO EARLIER DISCUSSIONS BETWEEN MR ELBRICK AND MY PREDECESSOR ON SEP 19/56,WHEN THE STATE DEPT OUTLINED ITS PLANS FOR AN AGREEMENT GOVERNING THE USE BY USAF OF THE MB-1 AIR TO AIR ROCKET.THIS PARTICULAR AGREEMENT WAS NOW IN EFFECT AS A RESULT OF FORMAL EXCHANGES OF NOTES BETWEEN THE TWO GOVTS.JONES SAID THAT THE EARLIER MEETING CONSTITUTED THE FIRST STEP IN THE STUDY OF MEANS BY WHICH SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS COULD BE MADE TO INCORPORATE ATOMIC WEAPONS INTO COMMON AIR DEFENCE OF THE NORTHAMERICAN CONTINENT. THE MB-1 AGREEMENT WHICH HAD BEEN CONCLUDED ON FEB 19/57,HAD BEEN RENEWED ON JUN28 LAST TO BE EFFECTIVE UNTIL JUH/58 0 2.THE USA AUTHORITIES NOW WISHED TO BEGIN EXPLORATIONS IN THE FIRST INSTANCE IN USA-CANADIAN MILITARY CHANNELS OF WAYS AND MEANS OF BRINGING ABOUT A CLOSER INTEGRATION OF ATOMIC CAPABILITIES IN CONTINENTAL AIR DEFENCE.(THIS INTENTION WAS REFERRED TO IN THE MOST RECENT USA NOTE CONCERNING MB-1 ROCKET OVERFLIGHT ARRANGEMENTS«) THE MATTERS THEY WOULD LIKE TO TAKE UP IN THESE TALKS WOULD INCLUDE.CA)WAYS AND MEANS UNDER THE ATOMIC ENERGY ACT OF SUPPLYING MB-1 ROCKETS TO RCAF INTERCEPTORS;<B)THE PROVISION OF ATOMIC WARHDADS TO ANY BOMARC UNITS THAT MAY BE ESTABLISHED IN CANADA; COPOSSIBLE CANADIAN REQUIREMENTS FOR NIKE-HERCULES TYPE WEAPONS WITH �*" ATOMIC WARHEADS, 3jTHESE PROPOSED TALKS WOULD ALSO INCLUDE PLANS FOR STORAGE OF M3-1 ROCKETS FOR EMPLOYMENT BY USAF INTERCEPTORS AT GOOSE BAY AND CERTAIN OTHER POINTS IN CANADA.THE USA NAVY IS PREPARED TO UNDERTAKE SEPARATE DISCUSSIONS WITH THE CANADIAN NAVY CONCERNING AN ITEM OF HOIE URGENCY,NAMELY,THE INTRODUCTION OF NUCLEAR ANTISUBMARINE DEVI CIS AT THE LEASED BASE IN ARGENTIA. 4-JOKES INDICATED THAT BEFORE ANY STEPS ARE TAKEN TO INITIATE THE PROPOSED DISCISSIONS THROUGH MILITARY CHANNELS,THE VIEWS AND COMMENTS OF THE CANADIAN GOVT WERE BEING SOUGHT IN ADVANCE* 5,AS A SEPARATE MATTERfTHE STATE DEPT WISHED TO RAISE THE QUESTION OF THE STORAGE 0? NUCLEAR WEAPONS AT GOOSE BAY FOR SAC,IN ORDER TO IMPROVE THi: OPERATIONAL EFFCTIVENESS OF THE STRATEGIC AIR COMMAND.THE USA REQUEST ON THIS ASPECT WAS SET FORTH IN AH AIDE MEMOIRE;THE T O T OF WHICH IS CONTAINED IN MY TEL 2631CJ0N£S EXPLAINED THAT THE QUESTXOM OF THE ARRANGEMENT FOR THE DEPLOYMENT OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS AT GOOSE BAY WAS BEING TAKEN UP WITH US DIRECTLY WJTIOUT PRIOR MILITARY CONSULTATION PRIMARILY FOR THE REASON THAT LOtfG STANDING X72)PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN IN EFFECT WITH CANADA COVERING THE CLEARANCE OF SAC PLANES CARRYING ATOMIC WEAPONS. 6..0M ALL THE FOREGOING MATTERS IT WAS MADE CLEAR THAT THE USA AUTHORITIES LOOKED FOR AN EXPRESSION OF THE VIEWS OF THE CANADIAN GOVT BEFORE ANY EXPLORATIONS THROUGH MILITARY CHANNELS ARE BEGUN. I TOLD JONES IN REPLY THAT THESE PROPOSALS WOULD BE BROUGHT TO YOUR ATTENTION AT ONCE BUT INDICATED THAT IN VIEW OF THE FORTHCODING NATO MEETING,AND THE ABSENCE OF MINISTERS FROM OTTAWA, TKSkE MIGHT BE SOME DELAY IN OBTAINING YOUR VIEWS. *?„£ RAISED THE QUESTION OF THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE PRESENTATION OF THESE PROPOSALS TO ANY PROPOSALS WHICH MAY BE MADE AT THE FORTHCOMING NJ.TO SESSIONS .JONES RECOGNIZED THE CLEAI RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE TWO AND SAID THAT THE PROPOSALS PRESENTED TO US TODAY K'GT HAVE TO BE MODIFIED IN SOME RESPECTS AS A RESULT OF THE NATO DISCUSSIONS,AtJD THAI CONVERSELY,THEY MIGHT TO SOME IXTENT AFFECT THE PROPOSALS TO BZ MADE IN THE NATO CONTEXT.THE STATE DEPT HAD CONCLUDEDjHOWEVER-THAT THESE PROPOSALS SHOULD BE BROUGHT TO OUR �P A ^ I T ^ E 2&3Q* * AT. 1'ION BEFORE THE NATO MEETING PRIMARILY BECAUSE OF THE LONG HISTORY OF CLOSE COOPERATION IN DEFENCE MATTERS,AND OUR COMMON RESPONSIBILITIES IN JOINT DEFENCE. g.THE QUESTION WAS RAISED AS TO WHETHER THE PROPOSED PROVISION OF THE MB-1ROCKET TO THE RCAF COULD BE ARRANGED WITHIN THE LIMITATIONS OF THE PRESENT ATOMIC ENERGY LEGISLATION.GENERAL LOPER REPLIED TO THIS,POINTING OUT THAT THE LIMITATIONS OF PRESENT LEGISLATION REQUIRED USA CUSTODY,BUT THAT THIS WAS ONE OF THE DETAILED MATTERS WHICH IT WAS HOPED TO EXPLORE FURTHER IN THE MILITARY DISCUSSIONS ENVISAGED,PRESUMABLY SIMILAR PROBLEMS WOULD HAVE TO BE EXAMINED IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED PROVISION OF ATOMIC WARHEADS TO ANY BOMARC UNITS THAT MIGHT BE ESTABLISHED IN CANADA,AND TO THE POSSIBLE PROVISION FOR CANADIAN REQUIREMENTS OF NIKE-HERCULES WEAPONS WITH ATOMIC WARHEADS, 9. IN VIEW OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THESE PROPOSALS,AND THEIR POLITICAL AS WELL AS MILITARY IMPLICATIONS FOR CANADA,I DREW ATTENTION TO MY UNDERSTANDING THAT WHEN THE QUESTION OF THE ETABLISHMENT OF .STORAGE FOR NON-NUCLEAR COMPONENTS AT GOOSE BAY HAD COME UP SOME YEARS AGO,UNDER THE PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATIONS IN BOTH COUNTRIES,WE HAD BEEN INFORMED OF THE INTERNAL CONSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS WHICH WOULD GOVERN THE REACHING OF A DECISION BY THE PRESIDENT TO AUTHORIZE THE USE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS.MY UNDERSTANDING WAS THAT WHILE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF DECISION FOR THEIR USE LAY ULTIMATELY IN THE HANDS OF THE PRESIDENT,THERE HAD BEEN SET UP A DIRECT CHAIN OF PRIOR CONSULTATION IN WHICH THE SECRETARY OF STATE WAS INCLUDED WHICH HAD TO BE FOLLOWED BEFORE A FINAL DECISION WITH RESPECT TO USE WAS TAKEN*I ASKED IF THESE ARRANGEMENTS WERE PRESENTLY IN FORCE.GENERAL LOPER SAID THAT UNDER EXISTING LEGISLATION AND THE RULES OF PROCEDURE,THE PRESIDENT HAD THE FINAL AUTHORITY,AND THAT KE ASSUMED THAT THE DECISION AS TO WHOM HE SHOULD CONSULT WOULD BE HIS.CI FEEL THAT THIS MATTER OF INTERNAL USA PROCEDURE THOUGH TECHNICALLY A DOMESTIC ONE IS IN FACT OF VERY GREAT AND DIRECT CONCERN TO A COUNTRY ASSOCIATED AS CLOSELY WITH USA DEFENCE AS CANADA IS), !0oIN REPLY TO A FURTHER QUESTION ON MY PART,JONES AND GENERAL 000626 �V PAGE FOUR 2630 LOPER BOTH CONFIRMED THAT THE ARRAL'GEMENT REQUESTED IN THE AIDE MEMOIRE FOR THE STORAGE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS AT GOOSE BAY WAS SIMILAR TO AN ARRANGEMENT ALREADY CONCLUDED BETWEEN THE USA AND THE UK GOVT. 0>! THIS POINT KY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THE MEW ELEMENT IS THAT WHILE ARRANGEMENTS ARE PRESENTLY IV EFFECT FOR THE STORAGE OF THE NON-NUCLEAR COMPONENTS AT GOOSE BAY FOR SAC,THE PRESENT REQUEST REBATES TO A REQUEST FOR THE STORAGE OF THE NUCLEAR COMPONENTS^ 1UUE ARE NOT PROPOSING ANY DISTRIBUTION OF THIS MSGoYOU WILL PRESUMABLY,HOWEVER,REPEA" IT TO THE MINISTER AT NATOPARIS .WHERE HE CAN DISCUSS IT WITH THE PRIME MJMISTER AND GENERAL PEARKS ROBERTSON � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context CDNW03908 Title A name given to the resource CDNW03908 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived "Untitled, TD No. 15A re: Nuclear Weapons/Canadian Forces," RG24-C-1-c, Box 24, file CSC 1888:1, Library and Archives Canada (LAC). Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Canadian Crown Subject The topic of the resource Nuclear Weapons Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Canada Declassified Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource PDF Language A language of the resource en