<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="123735" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/items/show/123735?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-09-01T05:35:41-04:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="112680">
      <src>https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/54e79f7e9e2729b881fd3c8e3df142ff.pdf</src>
      <authentication>bf9635f90f918501790977b7564de8dd</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="31">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="131">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="1186518">
                  <text>UNITED STATES PROPOSALS FOR CLOSER INTEGRATION OF ATOMIC CAPABILITIES
IN DEFENCE OF NORTH AMERICA
I
^
—
Y

y, 1.
Referring to the minutes of the SPECIAL meeting held on 18 Dec 57,
Mr. McCardle stated that it was his understanding that the Committee
had agreed to recommend to the Minister of National Defence that further
interdepartmental consideration be given to the draft papers which were
to be prepared with the object of putting before Cabinet two papers,
which in their final form would carry the agreements of other interested
departments.
2.
The Committee agreed that the papers as written for the Minister
of National Defence should concentrate on the military point of view,
but that the Acting Chairman would inform the Minister of the recommendation of the representative of the Department of External Affairs.
/2

EXTRACT FROM SPECIAL MEETING OF CHIEFS OF STIFF COMMITTEE - 20 DECEMBER 1957

000599

�-23. Mr. McCardle also stated that he thought it was recognized that
the final papers would have to reflect the substance of discussions
on similar matters in the course of this week's NATO Ministerial
meeting.
4.
The Committee agreed to record in the minutes that Mr. McCardle
had raised this point but considered that the reflection of the discussions at this week's NATO Ministerial meeting would have to await
the return of the Minister from Paris.
5. The, representative of the Department of External Affairs also
stated that while reserving the final opinion of the Under-Secretary
of State for External Affairs, he had indicated that he thought his
Department would wish to suggest to Ministers that the opportunity
afforded by Canadian Government agreement to the US proposal, if that
agreement were given, be taken to remind the U.S. Government once
again of the necessity of adequate consultation with Canada on situations which might lead to the possible use of the U.S. Strategic Air
Force.
6.
The Committee noted that it was the opinion of the representative of the Under-Secretary of State for External Affairs that this
would be a suitable opportunity to remind the U.S. Government of the
necessity of adequate consultation with Canada but that insofar as
the present status of military consultation was concerned, the Chiefs
of Staff were satisfied with the existing situation.
7. Mr. McCardle raised the question as to whether or not it would
be desirable at some later stage to give an indication to our NATO
allies of the nature and substance of our bilateral discussions with
the U.S. both with respect to the storage of weapons at Goose Bay
and the introduction of increased atomic capability into the air defences of the continent.
8*
The Committee agreed that this might well be desirable at a
later stage but should not be included in the papers prepared for the
Minister.
9»
The representative of the Department of External Affairs requested that the minutes of the SPECIAL meeting held on 18 Dec be amended
by the revision of parai 10 as ;ftfHdwss
"The Representative of the Under-Secretary of State for External
Affairs said that it was his understanding that United States
authorities were seeking political clearance from the Canadian
Government for explorations in military channels of detailed
arrangements for the introduction of specific nuclear weapons
into the continental air defence system*.
10. The Committee then considered at some length the papers prepared
for the Minister concerning US proposals for closer integration of
atomic capabilities in defence of North America, particularly with respect to military discussions;and storage of nuclear weapons at Goose
Bay.
11. During the course of discussion the following points were brought
outs
a)

that the\Minister might be advised that this proposal
was a further step towards supporting the Offensive
operations of the U.S. Strategic Air Force from Canadian
territory}

/3

�s

-3b)

that if the proposal to store nuclear weapons at
Goose Bay is approved, it would establish a principle that atomic weapons might be launched from
Canadian territory and might establish a precedent for further US requests for storage of atomic
weapons at other points in Canada and might
possibly lead to a US request for ICBM launching
sites to be located in Canada; and

c)

that the conditions of lease of the area occupied
by the US forces at Goose Bay was significantly
different from the conditions of lease of the
other leased-bases at Argentia, Fort Pepperrell
and Harmon Field.

12. It was agreed that the covering memorandum to the Minister
should stress the short notice at which the papers were prepared
and should also point out that during the course of their preparation and consideration the Chairman, Chiefs of Staff, together with
senior officials of the Department of External Affairs and the Privy
Council Office, were absent from Canada. The covering letter should
also inform the Minister that there had been no opportunity to find
out in more detail the reasons for the American request.
13. The Committee agreed to approve the papers as amended, and that
the Acting Chairman in consultation with the Deputy Minister would
prepare a covering memorandum to the Minister.
000601

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="43">
          <name>Identifier</name>
          <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1186491">
              <text>CDNW03893</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1186494">
              <text>CDNW03893</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="48">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1186497">
              <text>"Untitled, TD No. 15A re: Nuclear Weapons/Canadian Forces," RG24-C-1-c, Box 24, file CSC 1888:1, Library and Archives Canada (LAC). </text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1186500">
              <text>Canadian Crown</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1186503">
              <text>Nuclear Weapons</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="45">
          <name>Publisher</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1186506">
              <text>Canada Declassified</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1186509">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="42">
          <name>Format</name>
          <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1186512">
              <text>PDF</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="44">
          <name>Language</name>
          <description>A language of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1186515">
              <text>en</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
