<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="123045" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/items/show/123045?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-08-07T01:18:41-04:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="111990">
      <src>https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/a2d8cf04157125a8c424603e09c24738.pdf</src>
      <authentication>d1d966f949408fa775410f2f7aa179a4</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="31">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="131">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="1179618">
                  <text>-S-vf&gt;
fbxtf-w.

fjfeifts.

5 "
FM EMBPARIS APR30/63 SECRET
TO EXTERNAL 436 OPIMMED

j

*T'

v^ci

5

'

XX\

1

v-A
» .i

!

-

_!

S

INFO NATOPARIS LDN WASHDC BONN ROME CCOS/ 1

10
1

NATO DEFENCE PLANNING
WE HAD A TALK WITH DE LA GRANDVILLECQUAI DORSAY)TODAY WITH'PARTICULAR
REF TO SECGENS REPORT ON NATO DEFENCE PLANNING AND IANF PROPOSAL.
HE TOLD US THAT FRENCH POSITION I S TO BE DECIDED AT A MTG OF CABINET
DEFENCE CTTEE PRESIDED BY GEN DE GAULLE ON MAY2,0N BASIS OF A
RECOMMENDATION BY COUVE DE MURVILLE.
2oACC0RDING TO DE LA GRANDVILLE GENERAL FRENCH LINE CAS ALREADY
INTIMATED IN PRESS HERE) IS THAT PLANS NOW APPROVED BY SACEUR AND
AMERICANS DO NOT RPT NOT REALLY CHANGE ANYTHING ;THEY ARE SENSIBLE
FROM A MILITARY POINT OF VIEW BUT SHOULD NOT RPT NOT BE EXPLOITED
FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES.IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT,PROVIDED NO
RPT NO ATTEMPT IS MADE TO MISREPRESENT IANF TO PUBLIC AS CREATING
SOMETHING NEW AND SEPARATE OR AS CHANGING SACEURS ROLE,FRANCE HAS
NO RPT NO REASON NOT RPT NOT TO GO ALONG WITH IDEA,
3.DE LA GRANDVILLE POINTED OUT THAT FRENCH MISGIVINGS HAD BEEN
AROUSED BY BRIT EFFORTS TO ADVERTISE PARA6 OF NASSAU AGREEMENT AS
OFFERING NEW MACHINERY FOR POLICY MAKING AND SHARING OF COMMAND.
SINCE THEN HE THOUGHT ORIGINAL BRIT CONCEPTION HAD BEEN BROUGHT
DOWN TO EARTH BY AMERICANS,SACEUR IN PARTICULAR BEING CONCERNED
TO RESTRICT HIS MISSION TO FIGHTING THE QUOTE BATTLE OF EUROPE UNQUOTE
CAS OPPOSED TO ATTACKING STRATEGIC TARGETS IN USSR) .SACEURS
TARGETTING SCHEDULES, WHICH ALREADY CALL FOR EMPLOYMENT OF ALL
AVAILABLE NUCLEAR FORCESC INCLUDING PRESUMABLY V B0M3ER FORCE) IN FIRST
24 HOURS AGAINST SOVIET ADVANCE IN CENTRALEUROPECIE AGAINST
TARGETS IN THE SOVIET SATELLITES)WOULD NOT RPT NOT BE CHANGED.NOR
RPT NOR WOULD THERE BE ANY NEED FOR REORGANIZATION OF SACEURS CHAIN
OF COMMAND AS A RESULT OF ASSIGNMENT TO HIM OF V BOMBER FORCE
... 2

000869

�PAGE TWO 436
AND CREATION OF NUCLEAR STRIKE RECONNAISSANCE SQUADRONS.
4«AS AT PRESENT ENVISAGED DE LA GRANDVILLE SAW TWO ADMITTED ADVANTAGES
IN IANF ARRANGEMENTS:CA)NET INCREMENT OF QUOTE REACH UNQUOTE
SECURED BY ASSIGNMENT OF WHOLE V BOMBER AND SUBSTITUTION OF POLARIS
ARMED SUBMARINES FOR JUPITERSjANDCB) INCREASE IN KNOWLEDGE FOR
EUROPEAN MEMBERS OF NUCLEAR STRIKE PLANS,BUT ONLY AS REGARDS ACE.
ON OTHER HAND HE SAW TWO POTENTIAL DISADVANTAGES AGAINST WHICH
FRENCH WOULD WISH TO GUARDsCA)ANY TENDENCY TO CREATE A DIV BETWEEN
USE OF NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS IN ACE COMMAND OR POLICY;
ANDCB)BY SAME TOKEN,THE DANGER THAT RUSSIANS MIGHT BE ENCOURAGED
TO ADVANCE THEIR IDEAS OF NUCLEAR DISENGAGEMENT IN CENTRALEUROPE.
5.WE TAKE IT FROM WHAT DE LA GRANDVILLE TOLD US THAT PRECISE FRENCH
POLICY TOWARD SECGENS REPORT AND OTT MTG WILL NOT RPT NOT BE DECIDED
UNTIL THUR.WE WOULD GUESS HOWEVER THAT, IF COUVES RECOMMENDATION I S
ACCEPTED, FRENCH EFFORTS WILL BE DIRECTED PRIMARILY AT 03TAINING
AGREEMENT OF OTHER NATO MEMBERS ON WHAT SHOULD AND WHAT SHOULD
NOT RPT NOT BE SAID ON THIS SUBJECT IN OTT COMMUNIQUE.

000870

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="43">
          <name>Identifier</name>
          <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1179591">
              <text>CDNW03584</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1179594">
              <text>CDNW03584</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="48">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1179597">
              <text>"NATO - Nuclear weapons - Policy - NATO long term planning," RG25-A-3-b, vol 5960, file 50219-AL-2-40, part 8-2, Library and Archives Canada (LAC). </text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1179600">
              <text>Canadian Crown</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1179603">
              <text>Nuclear Weapons</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="45">
          <name>Publisher</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1179606">
              <text>Canada Declassified</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1179609">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="42">
          <name>Format</name>
          <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1179612">
              <text>PDF</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="44">
          <name>Language</name>
          <description>A language of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1179615">
              <text>en</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
