<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="122802" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/items/show/122802?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-08-15T21:38:44-04:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="111747">
      <src>https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/bd1b8607fb08f4af4a8c363c0ff57343.pdf</src>
      <authentication>8269e148eb43bdedcb884413d8d9d102</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="31">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="131">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="1177188">
                  <text>^-^^^7-1/
FM WASHDC A P R 9 / 6 3 CONFD

C76" *7®

TO EXTERNAL 1 0 1 6 OPIMMED
INFO PERMISNY NATOPARIS EMBPARIS LDN BONN BRU ROME PRIORITY
HAGUE DISARMDELGVE
TT CCOS OTT FM OTT
BAG COPEN ATHENS OSLO LSIBON ANKARA MOSCOW FM LDN
BAG BERLIN FM BONN
REF OURTELS 9 7 6 , 9 7 7 * 9 7 8 APR3 AND 9 9 8 ( P A R A 1 0 ) A P R 5
SOME IMPRESSIONS OF HAROLD WILSON
WE HAVE SPOKEN TO WILLIS ARMSTRONG,DIRECTOR BNA,AND JUDD,UK DESK
OFFICER, WHO BETWEEN THEM ACCOMPANIED HAROLD WISLON TO MOST OF HIS
MTGS AND APPEARANCES IN WASHDC AND WHO HAD OPPORTUNITIES FOR INFORMAL
CONVERSATION WITH HIM DURING HIS FOUR DAY V I S I T ^RECORDS OF WILSONS
PRIVATE MTGS WITH THE PRESIDENTCWHO KEPT HIM 20 MINUTES OVERTIME)
AND WITH MCNAMARA AND ROSTOW HAD NOT RPT NOT YET BEEN MADE AVAILABLE
TO OTHER OFFICIALS AT THE TIME OF OUR ENQUIRIES,ARMSTRONG FELT
REASONABLY CERTAIN HOWEVER THAT IN ALL HIS CONTACTS HERE WILSON HAD
STAYED WITHIN POLICY LINES DRAWN IN HIS SPEECH TO NATIONAL PRESS
CLUBoSPEECH HAD BEEN CAREFULLY REVIEWED BY LABOR PARTY BEFORE WILSONS
DEPARTURE FROM LDN.CFULL TEXT TO OTT BY TRANSMITAL SLIP A P R 3 . &gt;
2oARMSTR0NG SAID THAT WILSON HAD COME TO WASHDC TO RENEW ACQUAINTANCE
WITH OR MEET FOR THE FIRST TIME LEADING MEMBERS OF ADMIN AND CONGRESS,,
HE HAD CLEARLY SET OUT TO MAKE A GOOD IMPRESSION AND HAD SUCCEEDED.
HE HAD RECEIVED A GENEROUS PRESS AND ACCORDING TO ARMSTRONG APPEARED
GENUINELY SATISFIED WITH HIS V I S I T 0 A T THE OUTSET HIS POLITICAL REPU°
TAT ION HAD BEEN SOMEWHAT AGAINST HIM BUT AFTER FOUR DAYS HE HAD LEFT
WITH SOME CREDIT TO DRAW ON . I N PARTICULAR HE HAD SUCCEEDED IN LARGELY
REMOVING THE IMPRESSION OF EXCESSIVE CLEVERNESS WHICH HE HAD ESTABLISHED IN THE MINDS OF USA AUTHORITIES

WHO HAD DEALT WITH HIM OR

KNOWN HIM OVER THE YEARS .(CONGRESSIONAL REACTIONS TO WILSON ARE OF
COURSE MUCH MORE DIFFICULT TO GAUGE.PERHAPS NOT RPT NOT SURPRISINGLY
HE FAILED TO WIN OVER SENATOR AIKEN WHO DESCRIBED HIM TO US AS
000572
r,
o a s e.

�PAGE TWO 1016
QUOTE A SMOOTH TALKER UNQUOTE .SENATOR FULBRIGHT ON THE OTHER HAND*
WHO HAD INVITED WILSON TO MEET TKE FOREIGN RELATIONS CTTEE,THOUGHT
THS APPEARANCE HAD BEEN GENERALLY A SUCCESS .WILSON HAD QUOTE GIVEN
ALL THE RIGHT ANSWERS UNQUOTE,ON NUCLEAR POLICY IN PARTICULARS
3.ARBSTRONG DESCRIBED WILSON AS A MAN UNDER DELIBERATE SELF CONTROL
IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTTERANCES,EXTREMELY INTELLIGENT,ARTICULATE
AMD WELL INFORMED,NOT RPT NOT PERSONALLY ARROGANT BUT UNMISTAKABLY
CONFIDENT OF THE OUTCOME OF THE NEXT ELECTION AND CORRESPONDINGLY
CONSCIOUS OF THE IMPORTANCE OF AVOIDING THE ASSUMPTION OF
EXTREME OR DOGMATIC POSITIONS*WHILE IN HIS PUBLIC STATEMENTS HE
HAD PUT FORWARD SOME VIEWSCEG ON NUCLEAR-FREE ZONES AND ON QUOTE
DE-NEGOTIATION UNQUOTE OF THE NASSAU AGREEMENT)WHICK HAD AT FIRST
AROUSED MISGIVINGS, HE HAD SUCCEEDED IN HIS CONVERSATION WITH RUSK
AND OTHERS IN MAKING IT CLEAR THAT HE HAD WHAT ARMSTRONG DESCRIBED
AS AN QUOTE INTEGRATED VIEW Of THE WORLD SCENE UNQUOTE AND THAT HE
COULD BE COUNTED ON NOT RPT NOT TO PURSUE DRAMATIC NEW LINES OF
POLICY WITHOUT CAREFUL REGARD TO THEIR WIDER IMPLICATIONS,,
-^ALTHOUGH AS REPORTED ABOVE,WILSON STUCK CLOSE TO HIS PREPARED
POSITIONS ON SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES,THE FOLLOWING SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS
«ADE TO US BY ARMSTRONG MAY HELP TO F I L L OUT TKE PICTURE*
5*QN COMMON MARKETCOURTEL 976&gt;WILSQN EXPRESSED GREAT RESPECT AND
ADMIRATION FOR HEATH PERSONALLY BUT CRITICIZED MACMILLAN GOVT FOR
WORSENING I T S OWN BARGAINING POSITION BY QUOTE GIVING AWAY TOO MUCH
"•UNQUOTE IN NEGOTIATIONS .WILSON DECLARED HIMSELF MORE INTERESTED IN
A BROAD ATLANTIC PARTNERSHIP THAN IN EUROPEAN UNITY AS SUCH,HE
IMPLIED HOWEVER THAT HE PLACED SOME HOPE IN WORKING THROUGH EUROPEAN
SOCIALISTS TOWARDS CLOSER UK COOPERATION WITH EUROPE*AS FOR NEXT
STAGES IN TRADE NEGOTIATIONS, WILSON EXPRESSED STRONG DESIRE TO MAKE
THE MOST OF TRADE EXPANSION ACT AND,ARMSTRONG REMARKED,SOUNDED MUCK
LIKE SECRETARY OF AGRIC FREEMAN IN ADVOCATING USE OF GATT AS MEANS
OF BRINGING PRESSURE TO BEAR ON FRENCH GOVT IN RESPECT OF COMMON
A6RICL POLICY,
e 3 e3

000573

�PAGE THREE 1016
S*WILSON SPOKE WITH ENTHUSIAUM ABOUT USA ADMINS POLICY ON'COMMODITY
AGREEMENTS.ARMSTRONGS COMMENT WAS THAT WILSON MIGHT BE SOMEWHAT
OPTIMISTIC IN HOPES OF WHAT COULD BE ACHIEVED BY THIS MEANS, "
7 . TO BOTH HERTERCWHO DISCLAIMED RESPONSIBILITY) AND DILLON? WILSON
EMPHASIZED IMPORTANCE HE ATTACHED TO INCREASED LIQUIDITY THROUGH IMF,
ARMSTRONG IMPLIED STATE DEPT HAD ENCOURAGED WILSON TO SPEAK IN T H I S
SENSE TO DILLON'AND SAIB WILSON THOUGHT HE MIGHT HAVE MADE SOME
IMPRESSION.

:

8oON NATO NUCLEAR POLICY, WILSON HAD SAID NOTHING WHICH IN ARMSTRONGS
VIEW WOULD CAUSE USA TO ALTER I T S PRESENT PLANS FOR ESTABLISHING'A
NATO NUCLEAR FORCE.ONE PROBABLE DIFFERENCE FROM POLICY'OF MACMILLAN
GOVT WAS THAT UNDER WILSON A LABOUR GOVT WOULD PREFER TO ASSIGN
NATIONAL FORCES WITHOUT QUALIFICATION TO INTERALLIED FORCE,TE, WITHOUT
RESERVING RIGHT TO WITHDRAW SUCH FORCES WHENEVER UK GOVT FELT I T
NECESSARY. ARMSTRONG HAD IMPRESSION THAT'WILSON WAS PERHAPS LESS
COOL TOWARD MULTILATERAL FORCE THAN MACMILLAN GOMT AT THE MOMENT
WAS, BUT HE MADE ONE INTERESTING OBSERVATION REGARDING FUTURE GERMAN.
ATTITUDE ON NUCLEAR MATTERS.HE HAD SAID THAT WILLY BRANDT AND ASSOCIATES DID NOT RPT NOT FEEL THE SAME DEGREE OF INTEREST IN BEING
A NUCLEAR POWER AS SOME ATTRIBUTED TO THE PRESENT FOR LEADERSHIP.
THUS IN EVENT OF SPD COMING TO POWER,APPREHENSION REGARDING GERMAN
NUCLEAR AMBITIONS WOULD NOT RPT NOT BE AS VALID A BASIS' FOR POLICY
AS IT'MIGHT BE IN PRESENT CIRCUMSTANCES.'
9.ON MORE GENERAL ASPACTS OF DEFENCE POLICY, WILSON SAID CLEARLY THAT
IF LABOUR FORMED NEXT UK GOVT THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE A VERY THOROUGH
REEXAM OF USA UK* DEFENCE COOPERATION. WILSON HAD MADE I T CRYSTAL
CLEAR'THAT HE WAS IN EARNEST ABOUT PUTTING AN END TO INDEPENDENT
NUCLEAR DETERRENT AND THAT KE WOULD NOT RPT NOT CARRY ON WITH
POLARIS AGREEMENT*
!0;-ASKED WHAT OTHER SUBJECTS MIGHT GIVE RISE TO D I F F I C U L T I E S OR
REEXAM W

WILSON BECAME PM, ARMSTRONG MENTIONED EAST«WEST TRADE

�PAGE FOUR 1 0 1 6

. . . .

.••....,

AND POSSIBLY DISARM ( I N EVENT THAT WILSON PRESSED -IDEA OF NUCLEAR
FREE ZONES).OFFICIALS RESPONSIBLE FOR BERLIN QUESTIONS IN STATE
DEPT HAD NOT RPT NOT. HOWEVER BEEN ALARMED BY PASSAGE ON BERLIN AND
GERMANY IN WILSONS SPEECH TO NATIONAL PRESS CLUB.

(

„

.

U . ON AFRICAN QUEST IONS, ARM STRONG : THOUGHT WILSON MIGHT BE SOMEWHAT
.

....'..

-

• a,

•

••

a '

. . .

CLOSER. TO.,VIEWS OF AFRICAN BUREAU IN STATE DEPT THAN WAS-THE, CASE
i

.

.

.

.

.

WITH MACMILLAN GOVT,IE,SOMEWHAT MORE QUOTE LIBERAL UNQUOTE IN COMPLEXION .BUT WILSON HAD SHOWN HIMSELF FULLY .CONSCIOUS OF DIFFICULTIES
FACED BY UK,ESPECIALLY. IN KENYA AND SOUTHERNRHODESIA .ON SOUTHERN
RHODESIA HE HAD. SAID THAT I F HE • WERE IN POWER HE WOULD .NOT RPT NOT
GRANT INDEPENDENCE TO SOUTHERNRHODESIA WITHOUT, A .NEW CONSTITUTION.
.

'.

*

• • • .i

1 2 . I N R£Pi-Y TO A QUEST ION, ARMSTRONG SAID THAT SQ.FAR-AS HE KNEW

_•

THERE HAD BEEN NO RPT NO CRITICISM OF USA POLICY ON CUBA ALTHOUGH
WILSON HAD MENTIONED,AS HE HAD IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS DURING THE
CUBAN C R I S I S , H I S VIEW THAT THERE SHOULD BE BETTER ARRANGEMENTS FOR
CONSULTATION IN SIMILAR SITUATIONS IN FUTURE. -

• .--,•

13.FROM USA POINT OF VIEW,ARMSTRONG SAID THERE HAD. NATURALLY BEEN
AN EFFORT TO EXPLAIN CURRENT ADMIN POLICIES ON: TOPICAL; PROBLEMS AND
ARMSTRONG THOUGHT IT WAS PERHAPS NOT RFT NOT TOO MUCH TO,HOPE,ON
THE BASIS OF WILSONS APPARENT REACTIONS HERE AND _ OF HIS; PRESS CONFERENCE ON RETURNING TO LDN,THAT HE HAD ACQUIRED A FULLER/UNDERSTANDING
OF USA THINKING . T H I S VfAS PERHAPS PARTICULARLY TRUE 'ON-ISSUES SUCH AS
DISARM AND NUCLEAR POLICY.IT WAS CLEAR FROM ARMSTRONGS COMMENTS'
THAT,ALTHOUGH.HE. WAS NOT RFT NOT AWARE OF HOy THE: PRESIDENT; OR
MCNAMARA. HAD REACTED,THE SATE DEPT WOULD HAVE -NO RPT- NO, SERIOUS
QUALMS I F LABOUR UNDER WILSON WERE .TO REGAIN POWER-AT THE NEXT
ELECTION..
I4.WILS0NS V I S I T

..••••.
I S TO SE FOLLOWED BY LOWER KEY V I S I T S BY CALLAHAN,

GORDON WALKER AND HEALEY IN THE NEXT FEW MONTHS .THE STATE DEPT ARE
NOT RPT NOT INCLINED TO BE APPREHENSIVE ABOUT THE EFFECT OF THIS
OPPOSITION PROCESSION ON THE ADMINS RELATIONS WITH THE MACMILLAN
&lt;&amp; ft »

ci~

000575

�PAGE FIVE

1016

GOVT,ALTHOUGH ARMSTRONG AND JUDD BOTH REMARKED ON THE RATHER AWKWARD
POSITION OF CRMSSY-GORE.THE LATTER HAD GONE TO CONSIDERABLE LENGTHS
IN aANNING AND FACILITATING WILSONS V I S I T .WILSON HAD NOT RPT NOT
HOWEVER TAKEN ENB RPT TO HIS MTGS WITH USA O F F I C I A L S .

000576

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="43">
          <name>Identifier</name>
          <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1177161">
              <text>CDNW03503</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1177164">
              <text>CDNW03503</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="48">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1177167">
              <text>"NATO - Nuclear weapons - Policy - NATO long term planning," RG25-A-3-b, vol 5960, file 50219-AL-2-40, part 8-1, Library and Archives Canada (LAC). </text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1177170">
              <text>Canadian Crown</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1177173">
              <text>Nuclear Weapons</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="45">
          <name>Publisher</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1177176">
              <text>Canada Declassified</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1177179">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="42">
          <name>Format</name>
          <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1177182">
              <text>PDF</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="44">
          <name>Language</name>
          <description>A language of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1177185">
              <text>en</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
