<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="119124" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/items/show/119124?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-09-10T10:19:59-04:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="108069">
      <src>https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/6b3efeabbcc4543d751c7a956f210e01.pdf</src>
      <authentication>67aa9dcd98e845932fce887e0f37d770</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="31">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="131">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="1140408">
                  <text>Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur I'acces a I'information

Unrevised Hansard,
July 5, 1959,
pp.5442-3
(National Defence estimates)

Mr. Pearkes: As the Leader of the Opposition well knows, the discussions at the
i various meetings of the NATO council are
carried out in camera and the press is not
present. The council of the group of ministers issues a press release at the conclusion
of these meetings. I think the best answer
I can give him is to quote from the release
which was made in April of this year. I
am only quoting part of it:
The ministers-

Here, that refers to the ministers of defence
'of the NATO countries.
—heard full and valuable reports by the military
committee, the standing group and the supreme
allied commanders on the present state of the
forces of the alliance, on the progressive introduction of the most modern weapons and equipment
and on the forces needed for NATO defence in the
years ahead. They also heard progress reports on
projects initiated by the heads of government in
December. On the basis of those reports, a most
useful discussion took place between the ministers
and the NATO military authorities.

minister has now said that it would not
be honourable, and I agree with him, to alter
a commitment of this kind without informing
the other members of the council, presumably"
so that there could be a discussion. As a
matter of fact, this is how it has been done
in the case of the United Kingdom when
they wished to alter the commitment which
they had accepted. There was a discussion
in the appropriate NATO organ, but that is
not the procedure that has always been
adopted in all cases in NATO.
However, the minister is also reported as
having said in this meeting in the other
place that any Russian attack in Europe could
be forced to pause by the NATO shield forces
which would use tactical nuclear weapons.
I should like to ask him this question, whether
he feels that our brigade group equipment
in Europe is of a type now which would
permit us to play our part in that operation,
if it ever had to be undertaken? I am thinking particularly of the Lacrosse surface-tosurface missile of which the minister has
spoken and which he says is shortly to be
made available to the brigade. Has there
been any progress in actually making that
missile, which I believe can be used conventionally or in a nuclear way, available to
the troops, and is there any other equipment
which is required by the brigade to carry out
this undertaking which is not now available
to the brigade?

Then, they went on to say that they confirmed their support of the basic NATO strategy for the preservation of peace and for
the defence of member countries. This
defensive strategy continues to be founded
on the concept of a strong deterrent comprising the shield, with its conventional and
nuclear elements, and the nuclear retaliatory
forces. In other words, the requirements
that the military commanders felt were
Mr. Pearkes: There is money provided in
necessary were explained to the ministers of
defence, and these general proposals were the estimates for the initial procurement of
this Lacrosse weapon. It is still undergoing
confirmed by the meeting of the heads of
government previously. Now, having these tests, and it is expected that these will have
general proposals and general requirements been completed by this September. Our posiconfirmed by the heads of government, it tion in connection with the requirements of this
seems to me it would not be quite honour- Lacrosse is unchanged. We believe it will
able for a country to alter those agreed materially strengthen the powers of resistance
of the brigade which is now in Europe.
requirements without informing the other
As other more advanced equipment becomes
members of the alliance.
This is what I meant in the remarks that- available I hope we shall take advantage of
I made to the committee of the other place. that and we intend to keep that brigade fully
I had no script, and I cannot remember equipped and operational. I have referred
exactly the words that I used. I did not already this afternoon to the tests which are
quote, as I have quoted here, but I thought being carried out in connection with the
personnel carrier, which would be armoured,
there might be a question on this subject so
and I hope that those prove successful.
i I had this final press release brought down
this afternoon.
Mr. Pearson: When the minister says that
any Russian attack in Europe could be forced
Mr. Pearson: I am glad to have the min- to pause by the NATO shield forces, which
&lt; ister's explanation of this particular report would use tactical nuclear weapons, he is
which goes considerably further than he has referring, I take it, to such weapons in the
gone today in his considered statement of the hands, not of the Canadian brigade at the
nature of our obligations as a NATO member in present time but other components of the
respect of the commitment we have accepted. shield forces, particularly the United States?
The statement in the press which I have just
Mr. Pearkes: That is correct; we have no
read says that there must be agreement before
a national commitment can be altered. The nuclear weapons at the present time.

000851

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="43">
          <name>Identifier</name>
          <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1140381">
              <text>CDNW01720</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1140384">
              <text>CDNW01720</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="48">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1140387">
              <text>"DEFENCE - Canada-US Arrangements - Acquisition of Nuclear Weapons for Use by Canadian Forces," RG2-B-2, Box 23-24, file D-1-5(f), Library and Archives Canada (LAC). </text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1140390">
              <text>Canadian Crown</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1140393">
              <text>Nuclear Weapons</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="45">
          <name>Publisher</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1140396">
              <text>Canada Declassified</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1140399">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="42">
          <name>Format</name>
          <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1140402">
              <text>PDF</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="44">
          <name>Language</name>
          <description>A language of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1140405">
              <text>en</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
