<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="1081" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/items/show/1081?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-05-23T00:21:06-04:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="1141">
      <src>https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/056c78a2d42d441eafd65e6ac03e3216.pdf</src>
      <authentication>6c367546c1e59c0247bb4fd117310514</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="31">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="131">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2579">
                  <text>Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act ORIGINAL Document
divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur /'acces ii /'information

32 COPIES

1 OF

Cv FY Nu.

LvND(.;N,ENGLAND
AFFAIRS,

,~
.~
ti

CYPHER - AUTO

---

~i•

if .

,-.•·

1
.... ...,.-.

Ji:,,}_
71

Brussels,

b LONDUN, December. 23, 19~0.
(Rec'd Dec. ?.4, 195,))

1

1(,Jl.~i,./tD Aai' L,,[l

/1.,., ~:

Top Secret.

December

,

lbth

Your telegI'ams

reached

an9_ Mr·. Claxton

I fully

2.

agree

would ·have little
cf the
.

that

should

seems to me to provide

to the need for

and points
greatest

urgency,

Atlantic

area.

up to date

increased
You will

in .the

light

might

oe done towards

-again

highlight

clearly.the

defeat

the

strength,

no doubt
of the

sessions.

general

lines

No.1971.

It

and accurate·picture,

up, as a matter

military

str~ngth

in the North

the memorandum

wish to bring

Brussels

of' the

discussions.

'l'his

t.he end of the memorandum and would.
increased

need for

in war.

building

I

·time, ·and I

telegram

a comprehensive

~J..1,-1,.1

of our present

end to the

in your

;

-~-~~~~:~:':i~~-:~_::
..:..:J

at these

be made at this

to add from this

&lt;"'frO
. ':-iC

have reported

Heeney will

an appreciation

memorandum
given
.

draft

military

and }'Ir.

r3

-r,,!\o. I~ r.,,~'l!'I

.

from Council

and proceedings

and prospects

situation

za.

If

and No.,

l'fo. ~-'.)

me on return

on the atmosphere

fully

-----

~~!;v{~,&lt;.&gt;•I~.
,~)1-f~ f-+- J
'r r.
r
.
mami. lo? -])-

::o~=~
t.
\

'I'(; P SECHE'r

t II
.

2

TJNDR/SEQ
/;

()

e1,

Wflh ~,
_,.~, ¥""

_}J .cI~v.?531

~INISTE!ff

,,,,,,..

(/l1Ti\WA

danger

a more rapid

tn order
Something

of war and indicate

build-up

to deter

of economic

aggression

along the following

and

or to prevent
lines

might

be appropriate:
.
'i'he new defence

undertook

to make in August

ab.out a very

North Atlantic
increases

efforts

large

increase·

Treaty

in defence

which

this

the

year

North

have not yet

:Ln the .-military

countrtes.
of strength

Atlantic

The greater

strength

part

has beert diverted

countries

brought
of the

6f the
t6 Korea

I
000387

,J

�Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur /'acces ii /'information

- ?. -

and in Western Europe there

in our ability
Atlantic

to resist

aggression.

The action

of the North

a Supreme Commander tor Western

Council in appointing

Europe and the decision

increase

has been no significant

to include

German forces

.in the in~egrated

roree

under the Supreme Commander could be considered

belli

by the Soviet

possible

Treaty

that

\·lhether this

bloc.

quickly

to deter

Soviet

that

up s'uft''icient

to build

Imperialism,

world attaining

Imperialism

the position

the threat

by

Events of the last
willing

·

might be

to prevent

the

could check Soviet

force.

few months indicate

to rv.n the risk

advance our·est1mar

in order

of effective

1t ·t's

forces

and as such it

where it

cafi•H

the North Atlantic

..

tempted to wage war in the near future
free

is so or not,

the USSR may well believe

Powers ai~e determined

as a

the Soviet

Union is

world war, and we must now

of a third

of the period

of maximum danger from the

previous

planning {~r~

of 1953-54 to 1951-52, and .the North

Atlantic

Treaty

must take immediate action

countries

defence production
particularly

3.
staff

up their

I realize

you will

be checking

Committee the military

estimate

I think

if' the

.have anything

nationality

value

30 divisions

like

or

the strength

and of these

and are located

in para

of a single

equipped,

geographic

position

of one

commander.. Of the

of questional:&gt;le

morale and

some are low establishment

far from the North.German

trained,
effectivel~,

I

6 of you1-- tele~ram

30 divisions

The one Norwegian ana one Danish division

cirgartized,

to ask them to

or. the number of formations.

some 15 are Italian

quality,

of

shown in your paper.

strengths

ment:loned

under 1::he control.

36 divisions,
divisions

forces,·

with the Chiefs

might be advisable·

it

·the effective

fighting

military

in Western Europe.

In addition,

doubt

and build

to expand

plain.

are not fully'

and are not in a suitable
'c;o intervene

in resisting

an

000388

�Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de_la Loi sur /'acces ii /'information

3 attack

on Western Europeo

two-thirds

One and one-third

Netherlands

divisions

position

was probaoly

The present

Belgian and one and

are not yet equip~ed and trained.
fairly

accura:tely ..given by

Marshal Montgomery in August when he stated

Field

10 divisions

available

two were fit

to f;ight.

4.

for the defence of Western Europe, only

On the other

appreciation

or the.

th~t

aspects

it- may be that

in view of the character

3 too grea~c emphasis

in paragraph

has been given to ·the particular

.of your

position

of Canada in co_ns1~er1ng
.
..

the differences
in a general

which separate
appreciation

make 1t clear
paragraph

that

are shared

the specific

kind,

by a great
11

countries.

for Canadian Gc&gt;vernment policy,'

these

in a sup1-lementary

Canadian

position

from the

to date to the defence
maintaining

stability

concerned;

security
stability

point

in the other

the effectiveness

and to participate
of the other

or re-armament

should also

peripheral

and ll

of the ~raft

areas

measures

- areas

( which

areas

in which we are

to North Atlantic

measures

referred

affecting

the

to in your·

the emphasis_ on t}?,e need and

should

be paramount,

due weight

effort

be questioned

wh-1ch reduced

to such countries

wculd be advantageous

1.s recognized

in paragraphs

9

memorandum).

It might reasonably

1n the military
available

area and to

which Canada should now take

in concerted

while

contribution

(l).Our

of our contribution

critical

the

be given to the imp·ortance of economic assistance

to the

5.

critical

steps

I)'le~orandum. In such a paper,

urgency

of view of:

to

and to include

memorandu·massessing

of the North Atlantic

and (2) The further

to increase

to extract

memorandum referring

the implications
references

to

As a

it would be advisable

in the general

references

.

to Canada in this

many other

perhaps

.

and that

1t might be preferable

the views attributed

of·presentation

matter

us from the United $tates,

of this

.

'

as India,

whether

an increase

the economi~a,ss~stance
Pakistan

even from the military

and Yugos;l.ayia

point

of vlew.

000389

�..

Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Do.cument divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur /'acces ii /'information

.

"·

'

- 4 Within limits,

the e~pansion

in defence effort

presumably be at the expense of restricted
consumption and investment
~hemselves.

should

1n the wes~ern countries

To the extent,.

however, that

economic ai.d to· .the cr1t:tca1

rearmament and ..

balance

between the

tor· a ·

two •. The modest Colombo Plan., which was designed

insufficient
event,

less_.dynam:lc than the p~esent,

rather

it

even if it

get· ahead with

aid. along

the possibility

from all

the

In any

points of·. view to ·

of _that plan.·

lines

or Canadian aid to Yugoslavia

in the form·or
available

may_prov.e

is implemented in full.·

would seem essen·t1al

bread grains

and other basic

Similarly,.

(particularly

supplies

from-Canada) should be re-examined

and more dangerous

in the new

in which we now find

situation

···

are _compet1t1·ve, · thought

areas

should be given to the most effective

situation

of

standards

ourselves

.•

60 A point which might well be emphasized in any
current

consideration

of th.e relative

armament and economic aid. is that
we. may exert

increased

. in this

ourselves,

it

defence effort
connection

that

importan~e

no mat.ter h'?w energetically
time for• any

is. going to take

to make itself

felt.

para 4 of Washington

WA-3315 o-r December 19th does not anticipate_
progress

in any event

to convert
train

plants

manpower for

priority

is given

to war production

It would se~m.desirable
to p1 ovide

countries
a larger

1

tq

part

substantial.

It will

and military

take

aid,.

which our resources

_of civilian

takeadvantage

a 11:tgh p:roportion

in the form of civilian

teletype.
time
and

-Even if' the h;ghest

adapted to the contribution
.

period

during

(We note

and ·to mobilize

the new tasks.

bound to be an interval

better

before mid-1951)

to re-armament

of r_e-.

there
will

1s

be,

type$ of aid.

.

of· this

of our help

supplies.

_

transiti~nal
t·o other

Lat.er

w~en

of our economy has l:&gt;een turned. over to

000390

�Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur /'acces ii /'information

- 5 defence

preparations~

we may not be in as good a pos1tio~

to make _oµr economic weight fe).t in such places
Yugoslavia

and Asia.

c~ncentrate

attention

.

While it ls probably

at this

ot friendly

desirable

to

stage on the need for increased

t~at _·for the· immediate

·er our

high proportion

as

there :w:oulo seem to be much merit_. in

defence prepa~ations,
recognizing

.

countries

future

-contribution

at least- a fairly

to the strengthening

or

can probably ·oest take the form

economic aid.

7.
11

capacity

Although
11

the importance

analysis

to

of the

oe undertaken

from the point

make our plans

of view

sufficiently

those

:European countries

their

feet

in that

early

exercise.

effort

or

Paris

Working Group.

a useful

stimulus

or effective

timing.

to avo.id giving

to

comfort

inclined

to

to drag

If' we intend to match our efforts
situation

the United States

for us to make our intentions

Working

1t would seem

whi,:h may be rather

with the needs of the present
impressive

:i.mpact" and

by the Paris

Group of NATOshould not be exaggerated,
desirable,

11

clear

- and with tl)e
- it might be well

:ln our submission

to the

In that. way we may be able to provide

to the NATOcountries

in Europe.

HIGH CONMISSIONER.

.....
::J

�i
I

i

Ex~

OTTAWA

43

Letter

No .............................

.

FILE

No.~~~

.l~.~. :-.)).•.":-/"I

SECURITY

CLA SSI F !CAT ION

TOP SECRET.
FROM: OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER
FOR CANADA,
LONDON.
TO:

THE UNDER-SECRETARY
OF STATEFOR EXTERNAL
AFFAIRS, CANADA

:J5.~t.errne;J...
:i..~t.t.~;r:.
P:~$.~3~.4
5..9.f'..P.~9.~IJlJ:l~r..
;l).th, . .+9.59.•
......... ..
r,nm.n~~n
n fi"Gr1;:;-. 'i?fi'\
1· 1 ~~r.::--~
........................
The Intern~tional
C""iSiS. @@.
r,·f
·.'-,Ji
:J.'IJJL
_,v\ ...
,.l. !\\\\
I, ...l;',,,.:·~.Y
....•. ,..... ,v i!,,/J
•• ,_.( ,~lJ\L.::::
.
r:- .,.G'I~ TT~~;,~
§t
'017;'
l.&lt;1-1•.. ~.
L'. ":\:, •iv,~~ n

Reference ......

.
Su bJect

'"'I •••••••••••

,.._ ••••••••

••

t'

t.fth·,01.::-;,.. L

s
i:.:

1

0

1
":.

-.r:1

0b1...~Ltlt:.:iU

I am sorry not to have had an earlier opportunity of replying to your letter u.s.3845 of December
11th, with which you sent us copies of two Departmental
memoranda dealing with "The International
Crisis - Some
Basic Considerations"
and "The Defeat in Korea".
The
draft memorandumfor Cabinet, contained in your telegram
No. 1971 of December 18th, on which I commented in my
telegram No. 2531 of December 23rd appeared to me to be
based upon these earlier papers forwarded with your
letter under reference.
Copies Referred

To..............

.

2.
I should like, however, to add one or two
comments which, even at this date, may be of some value
in any subsequent revisions of these papers.

3.

With respect to the first paper dealing with
the international
crisis,
our comments are as follows:

Paragraph 3: You would probably wish to include
a reference to the Brussels Treaty as part of the
response to the first challenge.

No. of Enclosures

Post

File

Paragraph 4:
It might be more accurate to refer
to the Communist seizure of power in Czechoslovakia
as demonstrating not solely the inadequacy of the
Marshall Plan, but also the inadequacy of the
military strength of the Western Powers.
Paragraph~:
If I am correct in assuming that
paragraph
applies to the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization during 1949, I doubt if the North
Atlantic Treaty Powers increased their military
strength between August and December, 1949,
sufficiently
to be noted.
The real increase in
strength,
of course, dates from the Communist
aggression in Korea.
Paragraph 18:
While it is true that it is
important to increase the number of our allies,
and our allianc·e·: potential,
additional
commitments
should not be undertaken until we are in a position
to implement them.
4.
With respect _to the second memorandum, we have
had an opportunity of a recent discussion on a wholly
informal basis with D.P. Reilly, Foreign Office Chairman
of the Joint Intelligence
Committee, and his comments
will be of interest
to you.
#~'
/
,, . I, :.J ~, i.1 5)

000339

�- 2 -

5.
. With regard to the first paragraph, Reilly
thought that the second sentence reading:
"It is
possible that these two Powers have now decided to
precipitate
that war during the next twelve months"
was too pessimistic
an estimate.
The last United
Kingdom appreciation
was that the deliberate
precipitation of a world war by the Soviet Union in 1951 was
unlikely.
Reilly agreed, however, that recent events
in Korea and the recent decision to re-arm Western
Germany considerably increased the possible dangers in
the immediate future.
Another danger, he thought,
lay in the fact that the Soviet Union might be tempted
to act on the assumption that the Western Powers would
not use the atomic bomb. His view was that our
supremacy in this weapon is still
the major deterrent
to Soviet aggression,
and that we should not deprive
ourselves of the deterrent power of this weapon by ·
suggesting that it would not, under any circUII}.stances,
be used.
6.

With reference to paragraph 2 Reilly said
that he doubted whether United Kingdom Service authorities
would accept the estimate that in the event of Soviet
aggression all of South East Asia would fall within
three months, and the whole of the Middle East within
six months.
With reference to South East Asia, he
stressed the great importance of our present sea and
air supremacy, and thought that the defence of Malaya
was a practic.al task.
On the question
of the defence
of the Middle East, he said that it was hoped at the
forthcoming meeting of Prime Ministers to develop plans
for participation
of Commonwealth countries in this
area.
He stated that the United States regarded the
defence of the Middle East area as a United Kingdom and
Commonwealth responsibility,
although adding that he
believed there was a possibility
that the United States
view might gradually be modified.

CANADAH

000343

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="26">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1286">
                <text>NATO</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1396">
              <text>Warm War / 23 DECEMBER 1950 </text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="3242">
              <text>1950-12-23</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="42">
          <name>Format</name>
          <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="3247">
              <text>PDF</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="44">
          <name>Language</name>
          <description>A language of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="3252">
              <text>en</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="3257">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="43">
          <name>Identifier</name>
          <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="3262">
              <text>CDTT00087</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="48">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8332">
              <text>High Commissioner for Canada, London to Secretary of State for External Affairs no. 2531, 23 Dec. 1950, LAC, RG 25, vol. 4758, file no. 50069-D-40, part 1.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
  <tagContainer>
    <tag tagId="233">
      <name>Dana Wilgress</name>
    </tag>
    <tag tagId="441">
      <name>Reid</name>
    </tag>
    <tag tagId="531">
      <name>western Europe</name>
    </tag>
  </tagContainer>
</item>
