https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/27b4fbe5d648d0eb2e9176af4a456b01.pdf 56d6ff7ea80f61fe89bcb97c1937d4c0 PDF Text Text Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act • " Document divulgue en vertu de \aJ,Qi sup locoes it t!jifftu$%atia A7J ™ FM WASHDC J U N 3 / 5 9 RESTD TO EXTERNAL 1345 OPIMMEDIATE INFO NATOPARIS REF OURTEL 1344 JUN3 ' y> 7A Pt „ , i <?cT STORAGE OF ATOMIC WEAPONS ON THE FRENCH TERRITORY oSo'A^"*2 THE FOLLOWING I S THE TEXT OF AN ARTICLE BY JOHN NORRIS WHICH A AREB— IN YESTERDAY°SCJUN2>WASHDC POST ON THIS SUBJECT? TEXT BEGINS NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ALLIANCE NEGOTIATIONS OVER ESTABLISHMENT NUCLEAR-WARHEAD STOCKPILES IN FRANCE REPORTEDLY HAVE REACHED A - ^ T A t l > H MATE,THE IMPASSE PRESENTS NATO CHIEFS WITH THE PROBLEM OF VHAjyTO,, ABOUT AMERICAN WARPLANES NOW BASED IN FRANCE. PRESIDENT CHARLES DE GAULLE,IT I S UNDERSTOOD,HAS BEEN INSISTING ON AMERICAN ASSISTANCE IN GIVING FRANCE AN ATOMIC WEAPONS CAPABILITY, HE ALSO WANTS CUSTODY OF ANY NUCLEAR WARHEADS PROVIDED BY THE USA FOR USE BY FRENCH WARPLANES IN REPELLING AN ATTACK ON THE WESTERN ALLIANCE.THE AMERICAN GOVT HAS BEEM UNWILLING TO ACCEPT EITHER DEMAND. THE STALEMATE CREATES THE QUESTION!SHOULD THE USA LEAVE I T S FiOO FIGHTER-BOMBERS AT NATO BASES IN FRANCE WITHOUT ATOMIC WEAPONS OR MOVE THEM TO OTHER BASES IN EUROPE WITH OBVIOUS REPERCUSSIONS? NATO AND AMERICAN MILITARY LEADERS DO NOT RPT NOT REGARD THE SITUATION AS A C R I S I S , OR WITH ANY ALARM.TECHNICALLY THE NEGOTIATIONS HAVE NOT RPT NOT BEEN ABANDONED.IT I S UNDERSTOOD THAT GEN LAURIS NORSTADs USAF,NATO COMMANDER IN EUROPE,IN H I S TALKS WITH GEN PAUL ELY,CHIEF OF STAFF OF THE FRENCH ARMED FORCES,HAS MADE NO RPT NO THREAT TO TAKE USA WARPLANES OUT OF FRANCE. BUT NATO STAFF OFFICERS ARE CONSIDERING WHAT V/OULD BE THE BEST THING TO DOsFROM BOTH A MILITARY AND POLITICAL POINT OF VIEW, IN THE LIGHT OF THE FRENCH POSITION,OTHER NATO COUNTRIES DO PERMIT THE STOCKPILING OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS,UNDER AMERICAN CONTROL,FOR USE BOTH BY USA AND THEIR OW FORCES IN AN EMERGENCY.IT WOULD BE POSSIBLE AND ADVANTAGEOUS FROM THE STRICTLY MILITARY POSITION TO MOVE THE AMERICAN WARPLANES TO A BASE WHERE THEY COULD BE LOADED WITH ATOMIC BOMBS QUICKLY IN CASE OF A SUDDEEI ATTACK<• FOR IN CASE OF NUCLEAR WAR,THEY COULD DO LITLE WITH CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS. 000773 �Document disclosed under the Access tolnformatitin Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur I'acces a I'information PAGE TWO 1345 BUT SUCH A MOVE MIGHT CREATE A NATO C R I S I S , WHIG); COULD GRAVELY '-'EAKEN •• THE WESTERN ALLIANCE,, IN CASE OF GENERAL WAR,NORSTAD5 3 fJAIN NUCLEAR PUNCH WOULD COME FROM THE USA STRATEGIC AIR COMMAND, BASED AT HOME, IN B R I T A I N SPAIN AND NORTH AFRICA,AMERICAN TACTICAL AIR FORCE UNITS ASSIGNED TO D ATO COULD CONTRIBUTE, BUT THE BULK OF THE;*! ALREADY ARE BELIEVED BASED IN THE QUOTE RAMSTEIN COMPLEX UNQUOTE IN WEST GERMANY, BECAUSE THE SUBJECT I S A TOUCHY ONE,NEITHER THE USA NOR OTHER NMTO GOVTS WILL CONFIRM THE EXISTENCE OF NUCLEAR STOCKPILES IN THE AREA. BRITAIN HAS AN ATOMIC CAPABILITY OF HER OWN AND UNDOUBTEDLY PERMITS ENTRANCE OF AMERICAN WEAPONS. WESTERN GERMANY, ITALY, GREECE AND TURKEYs AS WELL AS SPAIN,A NON-NATO POWER,ALSO ARE BELIEVED TO HAVE ACCEPTED SUCH STOCKS. THE STOCKPILING OF SUCH A WEAPONS WAS AGREED TO AT THE NATO SUMMIT MEETING IN PARIS IN DEC,1957,AND NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE FRENCH FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF SUCH ARSENALS WERE WELL ALONG WHEN DE GAULLE CAME TO POWER, AS A RESULT OF THE AGREEMENT, CONGRESS AMENDED THE ATOMC ENERGY ACT A YEAR AGO TO ASSIST AMERICAN ALLIES WITH LIMITED NUCLEAR INFO AND SUPPLIES,EXCEPT FOR NATION 0 S WHICH HAVE MADE QUOTE SUBSTANTIAL PROGRESS UNQUOTE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ATOMIC WEAPONS, THE AMENDMENT PERMITS AMERICAN OFFICIALS TO FURNISH NATO COUNTRIES INFO ABOU'E THE USE OF SUCH WEAPONS SO THEIR ARMED FORCES CAN BE TRAINED TO USE THEM IN AN EMERGENCY.IT I S CONTEMPLATED THAT THE USA WILL RETAIN CUSTODY OF THE WARHEADS, BRITAIN HAS BEEN GIVEN MUCH GREATER HELP IN BUILDING NUCLEAR ARMS, INASMUCH AS I T DEVELOPED SUCH WEAPONS ON I T S OWN,AGREEMENTS ALSO HAVE BEEN NEGOTIATED WITH WEST GERMANY, TURKEY, NETHERL/iNDS AND COA TO PROVIDE SUCH AMERICAN HELP IN TRAINING FCR USE OF ATOMIC WEAPONS, THESE AGREEMENTS,WERE LAID BEFORE CONGRESS A WEEK AGO..BARRING UNEXPECTED CONGRESSIONAL ACTION,THEY WILL GO INTO EFFECT WITHIN 6 0 DAYS, o o o3 000774 �Document disclosed under the Access to Information Act Document divulgue en vertu de la Loi sur I'acces a I'information PAGE THREE 1345 A SIMILAR ARRANGEMENT WITH GREECE HAS BEEN "CACHED,BUT THE ONLY AGREEMENT ATTAINED WITH FRANCE TO DATE I S F >R HELP IN BUILDING A SUBMARINE REACTOR. TEXT ENDS 000775 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context CDNW02420 Title A name given to the resource WASHDC to External 1345 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 03-Jun-59 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived �Atomic weapons - Canadian policy re - (Fourth power problem),� RG25-A-3-b, vol. 5961, file 50219-AM-40, pt. 2.1, Library and Archives Canada (LAC). Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Department of External Affairs Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Canadian Crown Subject The topic of the resource atomic cooperation, NATO, nuclear weapons Description An account of the resource Storage of Atomic Weapons on the French Territory Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Canada Declassified Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource PDF Language A language of the resource en